FLUX23

I said it is your god damn turn. Answer the 1) 2) 3) and 4). This is not fair. I've gave an unbiased information and you completely ignored them once ...

You really don't like reading other people's posts do you? Fine. But promise me you will read EVERY SINGLE WORD I have posted so far including this on...

Okay, so you still refuse to read. I know a priori is not a scientific term. I'm not trying to say anything scientific by saying: This is pure logic. ...

Oh my God. I'VE ALREADY EXPLAINED THIS!!!! WHAT ARE YOU READING!!!!!!!!??????????? You are the metaphysicist here. You are the wrong one here. You are...

Or maybe you have your eyes closed.

Oh my goodness... First of all, this "there are no particle" thing and "symbolic" crap you keep on saying has already been addressed hundreds of time ...

I would like you to address my concern instead of talking about something else. Also, stop trying to convince somebody of something you don't really u...

This is poor logic. Being unable to differentiate between two things does not mean two things are equivalent. It just means you don't know how to dist...

From the philosopher's perspective, arguing for Bohmian mechanics is fine. The interpretation is, along with Many-Worlds interpretation, less philosop...

I apologize for the late reply. I did read it, but did not have enough time to respond. By all means, I know what particles refer to and what they are...

If you are talking about Bohmian mechanics, that is merely one way to interpret quantum mechanics. It fails in several places with some other discipli...

If you are talking about the definition of a particle, then that is something else. Likewise, we can say that about every single thing in this world. ...

You are right in one sense. But it should be well noted that the Standard Model didn't just come out of nowhere by theorists. They all started from ex...

He says it is and have been saying it is, no matter how many times other people explained that it is not. Welcome to the other side.

Yes. In fact, it is continuously being refined. Currently, the most popular interpretation is the Copenhagen Interpretation, one of the older interpre...

For your information, the particle-wave duality is a classical attempt to understand quantum physical particles. Most physicists consider and accept t...

No.

lol, five pages of the same crap and this guy still doesn't get it. I bet he is still thinking we are wrong. Guys, I think it is about time we stop an...

If you want to talk about electrons, protons, and any of those elementary particles, you should probably study them a little before you make such an a...

Well someone has already done so, scientifically. I know you disregarded it. So I don't feel like doing the same thing. Besides, if you are going to s...

I know. I was being generous with him.

and for gazillion times, I am saying that is exactly the fallacy you are making. This is you on this thread: You: I like apples better because they ar...

Also, this is just simply wrong. I don't even slightly understand why you even thought that follows?

You mean this? Well, you have replied to most of the counter-argument other people made, but it does not correctly address the actual point they have ...

Well many people on this discussion already told you about the many errors in your reasoning, so it's not my position to restate what they've said (th...

I agree. I could not help but to laugh at that statement: "Scientific proof"...hahaha, I'm sorry. I'm a scientist myself, so it makes it worse...lol

I agree that a god, as a human created being in our minds, affected and still affects our lives one way or another in the way we behave, the concepts ...

Well if you are discussing the actual details of science and how religion can be compatible, then you are right. But I would talk about it from the ot...

I think he is referring to the fact that if you believe in a religion and science at the same time, then you will have to 1) religion your science out...

I think it is easier to understand it by interpreting it from the other end. We have this "something" that is supposedly the cause of the universe, an...

That is surely one of the possible interpretation of the current situation. But what is important is what I've said after that part.

I don't have any general disagreement/agreement in what you've said. But just to clear things up. Well the god-like thing I was talking about is more ...

The book is too long to read for a little given time I have. Do you have some short summary of what this new method is?

I agree that science is based on empirical derivation of what can be observed and interpreted from a phenomenon, making it a logical fallacy to believ...