That the US is responsible is certainly just an educated guess of mine. But I tried to focus more on the absurdity of the theory that's being presente...
I gave the documentary a watch. Honestly, the idea that an operation of this magnitude was carried out from a sailing yacht I find unlikely, bordering...
It's quite possible the US had a Ukrainian team carry out (a part of) the operation. This would provide the US with plausible deniability. Considering...
The tape surfaced on February 6th 2014. Yanukovych didn't cede power until February 21st, and the worst of the violence happened on February 20th. But...
Except that NATO's big daddy, the US, was directly involved in the coup. We've even got Nuland on tape, designing the new Ukrainian government before ...
'Not really anything', except for expanding NATO by another 7 countries, and planning another 2 - Ukraine and Georgia. NATO was fully aware what the R...
What even is your argument? :chin: The bottomline is your assertions are objectively untrue. We've got Washington officials going on record saying the...
Russia's position on Ukraine / Georgia NATO membership was known well before the 2008 Bucharest Summit, and not 'unexpected' at all. The Russian view ...
Unfortunately for some, the archives are actually loaded with proclamations like this. Not just from the Russians themselves, but from people in the W...
Concerns over the effects of NATO enlargement literally started as soon as the Soviet Union dissolved, so lets not play coy here. On your second point...
Because of energy dependency. In the case of nuclear energy it's more extreme than with oil and gas. I think Rosatom holds something in the range of 9...
It should be noted that reluctance to swap over to nuclear doesn't just come from oil and gas producers, but also the fact that the nuclear energy mar...
On a side note, the idea that Russia went to war to prevent NATO expansion into Ukraine has been (for whatever reason) a controversial topic here. Her...
Pre-2014, some sort of commitment to neutrality backed up by action could have probably avoided this war. War became virtually inevitable when Washing...
I don't think Russia would want to be part of the EU or NATO, even though such options have been explored in the past, mainly because it would entail ...
My sense is that Washington's intention was to use Ukraine as a means to bind Russia in a 'forever war' while simultaneously souring Russia's relation...
I get you're really desperate to frame me as being 'pro-Russian', but perhaps you can tone it down a little. Note the keyword. I even underlined it fo...
This is mumbo jumbo to me. "Denying the Russians victory" sounds like a quote from Dr. Strangelove's General Jack Ripper. I would worry about ending t...
I doubt many will want to swallow this pill, but this is the worst part, isn't it? NATO has goaded Ukraine into picking a fight with the Russians. Ukr...
You're right, and it's very disingenuous how our position is repeatedly framed as being 'pro-Russian', when in fact what we are asking is why we, (pre...
Honestly, I don't recall nor wish to go into most of them. (We studied literature or contemporary doctrine, not textbooks, but I assume that's what yo...
Of course. That's what I and many others have been saying for months. Military history and military thinkers, the development of contemporary land, na...
Ah, the next buzzword is introduced, since 'counteroffensive' obviously didn't work out so well. If what you're trying to do is convince me that peopl...
The amount of preparation, manpower and materiel that goes into an offensive means that it must make some form of strategic impact. If it cannot do th...
Right, so there's no plan. Just vacuous rhetoric with no sense of the human cost, which this offensive was a shining example of. This we already knew....
Define what 'Ukraine winning' looks like, and then explain how wasting thousands of lives on ill-advised offensives brings us closer to that end state...
So can we conclude Ukraine taking back Crimea is a pipedream? I'm just wondering if this failed offensive is what will break the western media bubble,...
When governments can no longer be seen as honest brokers of information it puts a bomb underneath the narratives concerning a wide variety of social a...
If there was any chance aliens had visited Earth, don't you think the other nations would be a little more interested in this? Why do you think litera...
Nonsense. You yourself equated the damage to heavy exercise. There are plenty of people from whom heavy exercise would be potentially dangerous, so yo...
Yes, it is listed as being very rare, whereas myocardial injury is apparently very common. To list one and omit to other I find misleading. Period. Yo...
A lot of angry raving, but your suggestion that adverse effects don't have to be included on medical labels simply because they may not be dangerous o...
Whether something is dangerous or damaging has never been the sole criterium for why things ought to be listed on the label as potential adverse effec...
I think this bit, coming from the site you probably plucked that link from, is a fair representation of what people thought of the risks of myocarditi...
You really need me to answer that? When you read a medical label and it says "may cause headaches", did the company put that there because they though...
I'm not sure who you think you're fooling if you are seriously arguing this was all common knowledge when people were being vaccinated en masse. Yours...
You're looking at it the wrong way. The study concludes a significant amount of people are developing adverse effects within 30 days of their injectio...
This juxtaposition makes little sense to me, because I don't think governments prevent monopolies from forming, rather monopolies seem to form way mor...
Comments