You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

RegularGuy

Comments

:lol: My vagina is now dry. Thanks.
March 07, 2019 at 22:45
LOL
March 07, 2019 at 22:38
@"S" may be a dick sometimes, but at least I have respect for him. Others, not so much.
March 07, 2019 at 22:09
Good for you! Just letting you know where you and I stand.
March 07, 2019 at 22:04
Anyone who would stick up for someone as purely evil as Ayn Rand is no friend of mine. Besides, the title of the thread was directed at Ron Johnson’s ...
March 07, 2019 at 21:13
I’m sorry but I don’t see any solutions to an impossible situation. Hug your loved ones is all I can say.
March 07, 2019 at 04:01
You seem nice
March 07, 2019 at 03:09
Get in great shape, build an arsenal, build a bunker and stock it with stuffs, etc. Naw, I’m fucking kidding. Have a beer, smoke a joint, snort some O...
March 07, 2019 at 02:43
Naw. I would ask you to lead a reading group on a symbolic logic text, but you’re probably already too busy. Perhaps @"andrewk"?
March 06, 2019 at 22:56
You should really post more often. :up:
March 06, 2019 at 22:50
Do you have a maths degree or are you self-taught?
March 06, 2019 at 22:46
Thanks. I will read that later.
March 06, 2019 at 22:21
I guess “c+c=c” is nonsense as a logical string.
March 06, 2019 at 22:17
I don’t remember if “c+c=c” shows up in the paper, but one of the things shown was that the speed of light is constant, hence “c”.
March 06, 2019 at 21:20
You could read Einstein’s paper on Special Relativity. It’s short.
March 06, 2019 at 21:13
I just postulated to my wife a couple of months ago that in a few years everyone is going to have 3D printers in their home. You will go to Amazon.com...
March 06, 2019 at 19:31
I was being facetious. I don’t know if civilization collapse will happen in my lifetime, but I suspect whenever it comes it will be hell.
March 06, 2019 at 18:41
Shit, unenlightened. I’d like to get physically fit enough before the upcoming free-for-all at the end of civilization. I reckon there will be a lot o...
March 06, 2019 at 18:35
I’m perhaps going to cross a line. Does it have to do with hacking and identity theft?
March 06, 2019 at 01:58
Now I’m wondering if it was by illegal or unethical means.
March 06, 2019 at 01:39
Well, your ignoring me is just plain rude. Is Objectivism your religion and you didn’t like what I said about your beloved Ayn Rand in the lounge? It ...
March 06, 2019 at 01:21
You don’t have to defend your wealth if you are truly wealthy (unless it is in the billions of dollars, then I would say you’re treading on the people...
March 06, 2019 at 01:12
For me it depends on what you mean by “wealthy”. I would like to have $1 million of cash, but I don’t need to be like Jeff Bezos. A lot of people thin...
March 06, 2019 at 01:00
You should hear the jabs between me and my 18 year-old son. We take shit-talking to whole new levels. I love that shit-head! Love you, William, pussy ...
March 06, 2019 at 00:39
LOL. You don’t have to wear the headgear. I don’t.
March 06, 2019 at 00:30
Cool. I make you an honorary cheesehead. :wink: :up:
March 06, 2019 at 00:27
“2+2=4” is universally true but isn’t a property of matter outside of a mind observing it. Something like that.
March 06, 2019 at 00:16
I don’t know how to link the thread here.
March 06, 2019 at 00:14
Yeah, I worked toward that conclusion in the course of the thread, but I also worked in the materialism/idealism false dichotomy.
March 06, 2019 at 00:11
Is 2 + 2 = 4 universally true?
March 06, 2019 at 00:00
Absolutely agree. I think I was saying something like that in the “2+2=4” thread.
March 05, 2019 at 23:51
Ya der hey. I think I agree with that but you would have to spell it out for me.
March 05, 2019 at 23:45
I’m happy that you can dig it.
March 05, 2019 at 23:39
I think this is logically necessary. My question is: what is the significance of this argument?
March 05, 2019 at 23:38
I think mind and matter are both necessary conditions of existence. (As an aside, there may also be something called “spirit”, but I don’t know if thi...
March 05, 2019 at 23:32
Like I said earlier, I sort of jumped in without reading through the thread. What were people saying about subject/object dualism? I think subject/obj...
March 05, 2019 at 23:19
I now realize what I originally commented with was something of a non-sequitir. You seem to know much more about maths than I do.
March 05, 2019 at 23:13
You’re right, though. What I said may not deal with the OP. I guess ”2+2=4” is always true (universally true). It’s just that it’s not possible withou...
March 05, 2019 at 23:02
My point was that mathematical relations require a mind. “2+2=4” does not exist in the physical universe outside of minds.
March 05, 2019 at 22:39
@"Baden" is correct. Btw, I edited my post if you have further comments.
March 05, 2019 at 22:35
There very well could be energetic relations, etc. in these “sterile” universes. However, “relations” and “differences” and “entities” are observation...
March 05, 2019 at 22:20
I think acting requires a lot of intelligence. It requires thinking in counterfactuals and requires a level of emotional intelligence in that a good a...
March 05, 2019 at 17:24
With relativity, it requires a conscious observer with a particular location. Aliens are conscious as well. Without observers, would “location” even m...
March 05, 2019 at 17:12
I can have fun just as well as the next bloke, but it got to a point where I wasn’t sure if this was pure fun or if you really harbored animosity towa...
March 05, 2019 at 17:05
A mathematician friend of mine did his dissertation on something that was over my head. I asked him if it referred to anything in the physical univers...
March 05, 2019 at 16:32
There is math that doesn’t refer to anything in reality. For example, if String theory is correct, then the fundamental units have a minimum size whic...
March 05, 2019 at 16:25
It’s a perfectly fine thing. Vaginas are actually tougher than testicles, but telling a male chauvinist they have a vagina is like using their own gun...
March 05, 2019 at 15:58
But you didn’t start with a true statement. “2+2=4” is true given the conventional meanings of the terms used. “2+2=5” is false given the conventional...
March 05, 2019 at 10:20
You’re absolutely correct. My brain works by grouping things into categories more so than stringing together different entities. It’s a fault of my ne...
March 05, 2019 at 09:26
You’re right. All Western countries have similar provisions in their constitutions. I assume we all live in the West? I don’t think Saudi Arabia has t...
March 05, 2019 at 09:18