You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

RegularGuy

Comments

He has the keen ability to manipulate, which is a sign of intelligence at least in one forum.
July 27, 2019 at 18:11
If you like to win, then yes. I’m a terrible debater.
July 27, 2019 at 18:08
The most intelligent are often the most humorous, and at the same time, inaccessible to the masses.
July 27, 2019 at 17:55
I was thinking that selfishness and individualism cannot be the sole foundation as there is a duality to humanity which includes concern for the commu...
July 27, 2019 at 17:29
Maybe my title was confused. I’m not sure now. I don’t have a lot of confidence in that. I was thinking that if truth is a requirement of knowledge, t...
July 27, 2019 at 16:39
I’m not sure that games with rules have meaning, but they can be meaningful to some.
July 27, 2019 at 05:20
I found that what I’ve read from Chomsky is pretty disturbing and scary stuff. I think his criticisms should be leveled at the individuals who led and...
July 27, 2019 at 04:33
I agree. “Work” as in work you don’t enjoy or work that you mind is a dirty word.
July 27, 2019 at 04:17
“Work sets you free.” At one time a spiritual lesson, then made sinister by Auschwitz. Fucking Nazis.
July 27, 2019 at 04:07
Dare I ask for a translation?
July 27, 2019 at 03:27
I can’t tell if you’re being admonishing, analytical, or comical. I suspect it’s all of the above.
July 27, 2019 at 02:25
Got it.
July 27, 2019 at 02:22
Why is it “(1-.8)*.5” and not “.8*.5”?
July 27, 2019 at 02:07
Ha ha! I would go bananas if I had to do those jobs.
July 27, 2019 at 02:03
I’m sorry for your loss. Truly. Psychiatry cannot help the existential depression of a philosopher. They prescribe meds, and I don’t think meds would ...
July 27, 2019 at 02:01
Never mind. I think this answered my question, and I think I agree with you.
July 27, 2019 at 01:44
So metamathematics is provable, metaphysics is not. So, is counting apples meaningless? Or is that not mathematics?
July 27, 2019 at 01:42
Cool
July 26, 2019 at 23:25
Are you talking about frames of reference as used by Einstein in Special Relativity? Because Einstein said something like that what the universe is ac...
July 26, 2019 at 23:10
Still not getting it. I would need a detailed paper to understand what you are saying.
July 26, 2019 at 22:55
We’ll see what he says.
July 26, 2019 at 22:46
I thought he said the phrase referred to the concept which is mental and refers to something extra-mental, viz. what the physical world is from a part...
July 26, 2019 at 22:44
That’s not what he said.
July 26, 2019 at 22:41
I think you two are talking past each other. A concept is inherently both mental and as referring to something extra mental. My justification for the ...
July 26, 2019 at 22:38
I think @"alcontali" is talking about meta-mathematics. I could be mistaken.
July 26, 2019 at 22:34
I agree with you, however.
July 26, 2019 at 22:27
That’s what I envy you for. You always have the exact words you want to use to show your thinking. I’m much more muddled.
July 26, 2019 at 22:26
I would agree that they are very clear and systematic, but I think they are also simplistic in their analyses of how things really work; and they tend...
July 26, 2019 at 22:04
Karma is simply “for each action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” This is true in the physical world and in society. Reincarnation may just b...
July 26, 2019 at 21:47
Classic Terrapin. :lol:
July 26, 2019 at 21:33
I felt the same thing when my dad died last year, but I had schizophrenic feelings of relief, emancipation, and sadness all at the same time. He suffe...
July 26, 2019 at 21:25
Are you talking about the as of yet unknown or perhaps unknowable nature of qualia of perception and emotions?
July 26, 2019 at 21:11
I appreciate the optimism. I know who I’m going to vote for (not Biden) but will vote for Biden if he’s the nominee. It’s still very early.
July 26, 2019 at 05:47
There are 50 state elections. How much of the Dems support is coming from CA and NY? It’s the polls in the battleground states that we should be looki...
July 26, 2019 at 05:20
That should end with “QED,” the equivalent of philosopher smack talk.
July 26, 2019 at 05:11
Those are national polls. On MSNBC tonight, a poll showed that the only candidate who was ahead of Trump in Ohio was Biden. They say that as Ohio goes...
July 26, 2019 at 04:46
What does “unintended” mean then? If your point is that in the case of governments, institutions, and even individuals, important decisions should be ...
July 26, 2019 at 04:22
I see. It takes a team of experts and a consensus then (always difficult) in order to determine best policy. If only lobbyists didn’t get in the way.....
July 26, 2019 at 04:15
That said, I am certain you know as an environmental engineer what is best policy for the environment more so than politicians or corporations.
July 26, 2019 at 03:48
It’s easier to know what the direct intended consequences will be, but there are unintended consequences to every decision. Some good, some bad. “The ...
July 26, 2019 at 03:46
All true for a lot of decisions.
July 26, 2019 at 00:42
One only knows a decision is bad after the fact. And bad for whom or what? Some consequences are good for some and bad for others. That’s where values...
July 25, 2019 at 21:25
Environmental epistemologist. I like that. People do make decisions. It was ultimately the business class and the desire of the people to make their l...
July 25, 2019 at 21:14
Epistemology as the foundation of good decisions then? Science has made many stupid decisions. One example, in my opinion, the industrial revolution t...
July 25, 2019 at 20:55
That was what I was getting at I think. Science is useful (and destructive). Scientific knowledge can only explain the physical world. A lot of people...
July 25, 2019 at 20:43
It seems to me (I may be confused) that I don’t agree with the concept of a “necessary” decision. What about discovery? Could you explain further plea...
July 25, 2019 at 20:33
So you’re a proponent of positive justification for belief that need not be true. Care to justify that?
July 25, 2019 at 20:26
It depends on the language game you’re engaging in. I think that @"creativesoul" hit on some of my concerns, though.
July 25, 2019 at 01:54
So am I, obviously. Something about his personality strikes me as defective, though. This from someone who knows personal defects. He’s absolutely pat...
July 25, 2019 at 01:50
At least you can disagree without being disagreeable.
July 25, 2019 at 01:42