Im sorry, I just cannot believe that. You are refusing to even disagree with him in any real away, yet on and on you argue. You are having a very dish...
You are being trolled dude. Im guessing because he feels like he’s giving you your own medicine or something but its clear he is being deliberately ob...
Yes, Ive been following that and some of your other discussions. Word of advice: just lead with a good breakdown of good ol’ Dunning Kruger. Everythin...
Faith isnt a reason for believing in something. You do not believe in your driving because “faith”. You have actual reasons for believing in your driv...
I see. I used “judgement” to try and put things in a way Rank would easier digest but if that twisted what you meant then apologies. It should teach m...
It actually has been addressed, I think whats tripping you up perhaps is that there is an interaction between objective stuff and subjective stuff. Dr...
This what subjective means. You referenced a thought...thats the domain of subjectivity. Morals are not found under rocks, or anywhere in the physical...
The biology of our brains is what he means, the chemistry of our minds. For example, empathy comes from our evolution. It shouldnt be controversial th...
I agree. The whole of economics is like that, pretty dubious. Its one of those phantoms of society that everyone plays along with because at this poin...
Just fix the tax system so everyones paying the same percentage, make it so the system cannot be gamed so easily. Our systems are purchasable, thats a...
I guess I just dont see it. Its exactly what you would expect from someone who thinks morality is somehow objective, just as you would expect someone ...
Well, Im not sure why you are talking about “everything independently of mentality”, I may have missed parts(s) of the conversation I so rudely interj...
I think the idea is that mental phenomena are subject to bias and subjective limitations which weaken conclusions while if something can be confirmed ...
I remmber that, pretty funny. If any white people were offended, then they are looking to be offended, they are acting like children. I dont see why i...
I understand, but it still seems silly to me. Its ok to dress as Mr T, but not all the way? Gotta pretend Mr T wasnt black? What about an Asian guy, c...
Thats a bit different. You play dress up, and dress up as different things at a costume party. Its ok for exemple, to dress up as Mr. T and to that en...
I dont see how he did anything wrong in the first place. Why should he be publicly embarrassed then? Why does something so insignificant that happened...
Well, your example isnt about speech, but rather action but I suppose it falls under the PC paradigm. So he dressed up at a costume party as what? A b...
To me it depends on in what way they are being held responsible. On the level of person to person I think its fine. Dont hang out with the offensive p...
Because being able to declare something unpleasant or offensive is easy, it completly subjective, anyone can be offended by anything and if you allow ...
Yes, not all. No need to point that out since A) I didnt claim it was all teachers and B) even if I had specifically mentioned teachers I wouldnt be t...
Why would we want any political correctness at all? Its very nature is about postering and perception, a framework for virtue signalling and social co...
Lol, you just cant help yourself can you? I am surprised that more discussion about humour hasnt been brought up. Comedy is one clear area where PC is...
Not in any way that means it should be treated as indistinct from peoples actions, or in any way that is especially different than any other speech ab...
I do not agree. Its seems entirely possible to make that distinction, and dubious not to. They are different things and should be treated as such. Not...
Yes, I was taking you up on your new question/discussion after making my points about the other part of the discussion. I thought you were posing a re...
Asking questions is exactly, precisely being open to a different perspective, which is what Sushi did. So, what you really mean is you learned it is p...
It depends on if you are talking about intolerant speech, or intolerant actions. Intolerant speech is an unfortunate by-product of free speech, and fr...
I dont think your quite getting it. If the point at which you are on the issue is figuring out what “PC” means, you need to do more research. Take a l...
You seem to have missed my point entirely. “PC” are rules about what you can and cannot say. It is the attempt to force people to talk in a certain wa...
Not everyone holds PC/politeness in such high regard. For example I find it insincere, time wasting, obnoxious and often cowardly. (Cowardly becuase s...
No, PC is merely the description of the divide in degrees. I wouldnt agree its ever good as it represents the opposing view. “PC” is the difference in...
It seems to me that the disagreement (in general, not specific to you) isnt in the way things are defined, but rather in the way they are being measur...
Your examples are not about free speech. The person who agreed to talk about Law, then turns out to know nothing about law has come under false preten...
Harm, impact, yes. That must be weighed against the harm and impact of restricting speech. No contest. As the OP quoted, all your other freedoms come ...
Amen. You gotta love people arguing about free speech and not knowing what it is, or why its more important than protecting anyones feelings. Its for ...
Comments