Yeah, dude you've proven the existence of the laws of physics not God. Certainty not the Abrahamic God. An omnipresent omniscient entity that is moral...
Let me clear something up here. The only properties we have agreed on for this deity are A) omnipotence B) omnipresence Now as for your counter argume...
When? Was it on this discussion or somewhere else? The we are not real thingy. I can't exactly address an argument I haven't heard "can you trust me, ...
"In a world with more than one God, the ONLY possibility is war" Again, why? Reassertion is not proof. As long as it is imaginable it is potentially p...
Define: "Actual infinity". I always hear words like "the infinite" and "the transcended" from spiritual individuals (not saying you are one) and no on...
k lul. Just so you know this guy didn't prove the existence of any religious God, just the existence of SOMETHING that is omnipresent and omnipotent s...
When I said perfect I meant morally perfect and this being (omnipotent and omnipresent) is BY DEFINITION not morally perfect since it is the CAUSE of ...
"An infinite existence/that which is omnipresent DOES NOT HAVE the potential to generate a universe/reality that contains omnipotence because omnipote...
You said: "How then do you account for the paradox of something coming from nothing? All minds are limited to Existence and what Existence allows. If ...
Is it just me or are you contradicting yourself? This was all in the same comment A unicorn can be a potentiality. But omnipotence cannot. That's the ...
You say "I think false. You can have horns exist and then have unicorns come into existence independently of those horns. Right? If yes, then C is fal...
I don't think you saw my previous comment so I'm gonna repeat it. My main problem is with 8. I think it's a non sequitur. 6 is perfectly true. There m...
Also you seem to deny the existence of paradoxical concepts and affirm the existence of omnipotence even though omnipotence is itself a paradoxical co...
My main problem is with 8. I think it's a non sequitur. 6 is perfectly true. There must either be the potential of omnipotence or there must be omnipo...
I'm intrigued but I don't know anything about poker or game theory ¯\_(?)_/¯. If you could give the most dumbed-down version possible of those levels ...
I'm sorry if you talked about this in previous blog posts but I couldn't find them so I'm gonna post all my criticisms here No, you CAN be a source of...
The questions: "Does free will exist" and "Do people have free will" are VASTLY different questions. You seem to be asking the latter. Your question w...
Yeah I know dude, I wasn't arguing for either side. I was specifically pointing out that neither side has an absolute claim for truth HOWEVER the thei...
SteveKlinko But neither can theists prove the existence of God, this is why this cannot be taken as a point for theism unless you make the argument fr...
Questionall But you DO need infinite knowledge to know that you are not getting deceived and that it is not something or someone else communicating wi...
Could you give an example of point 2? How would referring to oneself relinquish one's personal moral agency? "I did it because I decided to do it" sou...
There is no logical fallacy here (idk about fallacy of relevance), atheists really cannot prove absolutely that God doesn't exist but the argument cou...
The idea of truth being relative is really what I wanted someone to arrive at. Since P3 and P2 are true, that restricts all forms of philosophical enq...
Comments