Elon Musk is developing astro-mining. It's a several trillion dollar-industry calculated as of late. Exactly, but the reason is that politicians are d...
You are making conclusions based on data that proves you "to know the truth", when in physics we still don't have data to complete a unification theor...
But we are living in a time when technology is in a whole other place than back then. The problem we face now is that technology will outperform us, t...
Does this even apply to the era we are in at the moment? It seems that we have flipped this on its head and that we now have a natural tendency to not...
I would say that epistemic responsibility is the first thing. That is a virtue to follow in the now. That responsibility demands that you do not make ...
I'm more with Sam Harris when it comes to moral, in that we can find parameters around moral that does not have anything to do with the reasons found ...
No, it is of interest, maybe this far I've seen too many objections without any relation to my actual argument, so I'm a bit on a defensive side. Thou...
I'm always careful using Freud as a source for definitions as most of his ideas about the mind, consciousness etc. are outdated and updated with a mor...
The point of that premise is not about dissecting their points, but to illuminate on alternatives to belief in which you might even be agnostic, but y...
You are attaching attributes to what's at the end which is assuming you know what it is and how it works, which isn't a logical conclusion to the argu...
That's why I am of the strong opinion that knowledge in fact-checking should be a primary thing in school. Read my new version of the argument above. ...
Thanks, alright let's see if this one is better: No argument has ever been able to prove the existence of God or gods through evidence. Religious beli...
No, they need to check the peer-reviewed material and look at falsifiable results. Standard methods for a conclusion. Because only doing the experimen...
The conclusion of the uncaused cause could mean anything, it could be a substance of particles that are unbound by spacetime and in that higher dimens...
Of course, but as my argument points out, epistemic responsibility has nothing to do with specific institutions. It is about every person. If you choo...
Faith was never a door, faith was the result of trying to explain the unexplainable, corrupted into ideas with less relation to rationally explaining ...
You haven't done a proper argument, you either intentionally or unintentionally confuse what philosophy you are discussing here. You mix metaphysical ...
Do you mean that "belief" in my argument is limited? Essentially here's my definition of different beliefs: A) Belief without support: You do not care...
There is no such thing as personal belief because everything you hold personal gets projected externally and therefore it isn't personal belief anymor...
Would you say that it's a logical induction that the probability of harmful belief and harmful consequences of belief is very high over a long enough ...
But I would argue that it did not need the science to be 100% correct. - If you believe whatever you want and that ends up killing someone, you had th...
Is your counter-argument that if there are any doubts to the conclusion of trying to falsify a belief you hold, then you don't need to falsify or try ...
Sorry, reversal of entropy so that the arrow of thermodynamics is turned around, making the energy go backwards, into the water from the high entropy ...
No it doesn't, it depends on the common methods of deciphering if the belief you have has any truth value. If you disagree that there are ways to find...
Alright, let's break them down. I mean, I may need to revise them to clarify them better. This is simple logical probability. If X has a probability o...
Then why ask something about something that is known to you? Almost all my premises are based on previously established arguments in philosophy. Yes, ...
Because adding energy require you to add energy with something, converting energy into new less form of energy along the line of thermodynamics and en...
You might want to look up Epistemic Responsibility first. Not really, I'm making an argument against belief that is corruptable due to the lack of wil...
The difference is the foundation of the ethics in this. To act like a belief is true versus understanding something is only belief and shouldn't be ta...
So if I believe that killing my neighbor is a good thing. Because I cannot prove this to be true its silly not to kill my neighbor? If you get caught ...
You are making a straw man out of this. Hypothesis = an idea about how something might be, never acted out as truth. Belief (religious, spiritual or c...
I fail to see how this relates? My conclusion is that belief without rational explanation or evidence that support that belief, is dangerous. Someone ...
Religious faith and belief, or other beliefs that are held without caring to rationally explain or have evidence for them are not the same things as s...
How is this an example of belief? It seems you don't know what a hypothesis is? Or how it is used in science? A scientist does not act upon a hypothes...
That belief as a justified existence has been made by Pascal's wager and Kierkegaard's idea that faith/belief should exist because it isn't proved. Es...
Do you add energy to the water and heat it up again? No, you travel back along the line of energy, backward thermodynamics. The water starts to heat i...
I'm talking about Pascal's wager and Kierkegaard argument that belief is supposed to be without any evidence. This is the road most religious people t...
These are examples of why my conclusion seems to holds up. And it supports the idea of epistemic responsibility. Which is why belief in anything that ...
It's about the belief that does not have evidence or logical rational arguments behind them. If you have a scientific hypothesis, its never promoted a...
Essentially I mean that we think we travel in time, but we are generally traveling between different levels of energy distribution under entropy. If I...
At the moment we can only look at the facts that exist in general relativity, special relativity and quantum mechanics. Though, incompatible with each...
Art needs to be a creation with intended communication of something. It then needs to be combined with a receiver (viewer) of that communication. The ...
Resource-based economy has some merits, but mostly it's a very utopian idea that has big flaws in a society larger than a large tribe. I think that ba...
Most people handle different systems like a final system that won't change over time. This is a radical naive view of how systems exist in society. Sy...
Yes, I worked out methods for A.I researchers on this as well, so I'm familiar with the process in A.I research. I'm aware of the flaws because I'm no...
Can you explain the motivations of a higher being? It's like explaining how dimensions we cannot perceive looks, feels and behaves like, on a percepti...
Except you ignore biological evidence for evolutionary changes within cells, DNA and genes. If you only look at the physical form, you would assume me...
I'm not saying he was wrong or that the methodology wasn't advanced enough for serious science. I'm saying that science is a field which builds on top...
Comments