You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Christoffer

Comments

Wasn't the point of this to evaluate what's the point if there was a God? And if there was a God, based on the common arguments that only points to a ...
February 13, 2019 at 15:08
There are no signs at all of interacting with God, a cake enrich my life and it wasn't made by God, you cannot confirm that you will interact with God...
February 13, 2019 at 14:41
Absolutely, but we have to realize that a lot of the higher educations focus on jobs that as of now change their entire business strategy to make room...
February 13, 2019 at 12:40
And regular classes and education forms are like the rest of the world? There's nothing in education that is like the real world so there's no form to...
February 13, 2019 at 10:25
If you want free education, move to Sweden, there are no compromises to the education form, but it's free. Except when it comes to material like books...
February 13, 2019 at 10:13
It will only feel like sleep for the person you copied if you copied everything exactly. The person who died, died. No we don't, our minds are very ac...
February 13, 2019 at 09:33
As I might very well be the most atheist on this forum (at least from what I've read), looking at it as given that God exists, it reminded me of John ...
February 12, 2019 at 23:02
I think it has to do with purity. We have a disgust center in our brain, the anterior insula which regulates emotional feedback on disgust. People ran...
February 12, 2019 at 20:44
Psychology primarily use the system 1 and system 2 for how we process and think about the world, and then the five-factor model for personality. If yo...
February 12, 2019 at 20:05
Yes, but for this graph, it's more about the political coordination of political systems in relation to the people. Quantitative features have more to...
February 12, 2019 at 19:32
I've been trying to complement that map, thinking about if there are other parameters. Right now it's pretty solid in showing the collective, the indi...
February 12, 2019 at 18:51
As per the map above.
February 12, 2019 at 18:47
I'm a bit confused by how this isn't obvious for everyone. Gender identity science is a real thing, there are tons to read about it, but I think peopl...
February 12, 2019 at 18:20
There was already a tunnel under a segment of the wall. I think that says it all. It's a waste of money and resources. And in what way would it help t...
February 12, 2019 at 18:04
Communism has failed because of corruption both of the state and the ideas, it's not about scale. Anarchy, however, cannot work because how we humans ...
February 12, 2019 at 15:45
If a person strives for the well-being of others and the self, combined; While holding knowledge and the pursuit for truth higher than the sum of thei...
February 12, 2019 at 13:28
If you knew why they don't work together you would have already created a unification theory. Both have been proven to work, it's bridging between the...
February 11, 2019 at 18:38
Both are real, it's why they are trying to reach a unification theory, not a replacement theory.
February 11, 2019 at 18:03
Which was one of my points... Copernican heliocentrism was published in 1543. Since we now have a system that strictly governs scientific work, the me...
February 11, 2019 at 17:44
But neither of them disproves previous scientific truths as being false, this is a misunderstanding of what a scientific theory is compared to a "norm...
February 11, 2019 at 17:20
Are you essentially saying that when getting rid of "God" in the terminology, there is nothing that could be called artificial, since each artificial ...
February 11, 2019 at 13:31
Of course, I think that we become more "godlike" than by defining ourselves as Gods by the normal definition we use for "God". We also become a panthe...
February 11, 2019 at 13:18
N is in concepts outside of math, the equivalent of zero. In terms of space; if you add four walls, one floor, and one ceiling you get previously defi...
February 11, 2019 at 13:03
How do you define controlled evolution then? It is not supernatural and not programmed by any other, but ourselves. Controlled evolution is going to b...
February 11, 2019 at 12:50
The explanandum of the argument just refers to the first cause... ...and the explanans of those arguments aren't deductive or even inductive, they are...
February 11, 2019 at 12:41
Only theories that didn't face proper verification and falsification (even before the term was invented) were able to be considered false. Generally, ...
February 11, 2019 at 12:23
How do we know there aren't other sentient beings in the universe that possess other knowledge? And isn't this a bit semantic? "All knowledge" is refe...
February 11, 2019 at 12:15
It has everything to do with this. It has been pretty clear that we've been discussing proving God's existence and to do that you need to apply scient...
February 11, 2019 at 11:48
I don't think those questions are asked in any problematic way, those were questions to you, not an argument. By saying "no", you are actually disagre...
February 11, 2019 at 11:05
See past that, I relate to the argument I made as I ended that segment with that it's not an attack. Yes, it's work and that is what I'm doing, theref...
February 09, 2019 at 15:10
In case of premise 1, I might need to add the definition of the classical concept of God through Christian theology or theology in general. Maybe even...
February 09, 2019 at 13:58
Banned user - Goodbye
February 09, 2019 at 13:38
Stop persisting with an argument you have no initial proof for. You have no argument. No, we can't, learn physics. You ignore actual science and you j...
February 09, 2019 at 01:02
Then you are not doing a philosophical argument, you are just believing without proof and you are just having an opinion, no argument at all.
February 09, 2019 at 00:49
You are not listening to the objections of your argument. You have no support to the claim that time is infinite, therefore your argument is not worki...
February 09, 2019 at 00:42
How do you know time is infinite? You do not know that time is infinite. You do not know the nature of Big Bang since physics has not been able to ver...
February 09, 2019 at 00:30
What physics do you base this conclusion on? How do you know that entropy needs to be reset? So your argument fails right there, right? You need more ...
February 09, 2019 at 00:10
How do you prove time to be infinite? Why would infinity be reached at this time? This demands that your first statement to be true, which you haven't...
February 08, 2019 at 23:54
There is nothing to support any of this. An argument for something needs to make the conclusion true, this is just rambling ideas.
February 08, 2019 at 23:26
Why would it be maximum by now?
February 08, 2019 at 23:24
You still need to be clear on what premises you are referring to or in what way you counter-argue the conclusion. You cannot be vague, that is trollin...
February 08, 2019 at 23:10
I understand you are new here, maybe you don't get the rules of this forum? Stop trolling and do the discourse correctly.
February 08, 2019 at 22:57
What is the point of this question? Make a counter argument that has a relation to the argument presented. I cannot evade what I do not understand as ...
February 08, 2019 at 22:50
This isn't a clear counter-argument. What premises or what about the conclusion is problematic. You are too vague in your criticism.
February 08, 2019 at 22:46
Not sure what you mean here, it seems clear, there has never been any clear evidence or rational reasoning behind the existence of God. That's the pre...
February 08, 2019 at 22:44
I prefer you to make your counter-argument clear. Stop being intentionally difficult. This is philosophy.
February 08, 2019 at 22:35
This has no relation to the argument. This is an ethics argument. Make your point clear please.
February 08, 2019 at 22:31
No, it demands examining your belief instead of accepting it as truth without reason. What does this matter to this argument? I see no relation
February 08, 2019 at 22:08
Physics has proven theories and they haven't proven anything to support any unification theory. If you can't combine physics with your conclusion, you...
February 08, 2019 at 21:53