You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Terrapin Station

Comments

Yes. I think those phenomena are obvious.
June 22, 2019 at 19:17
I'm a physicalist, so I wouldn't say mental and physical, but mental and non-mental, or alternately, a subset of brain function (which is what "mental...
June 22, 2019 at 18:55
The first song and first painting would be no different. You're taking materials at hand and arranging them into something different. Again, this is n...
June 22, 2019 at 13:01
Could you clarify first what "stored information" versus "stored energy" would even be? I'm not sure what sort of thing(s) you're thinking of. What wo...
June 22, 2019 at 12:50
No, I'd never say anything like that. I'm the guy rather diametrically opposed to any judgmental normatives like that.
June 22, 2019 at 12:47
Hopefully this link will work for you. I've posted variations on this many times, because it's a crucial issue that never gets addressed (not just her...
June 22, 2019 at 12:43
Since you're not just using "homunculus"/"homunculi" in a "decorative literary" manner--at least it doesn't seem like you are since you then go on to ...
June 22, 2019 at 12:37
To do something with it, there has to be an it. Most of the world is the it. The division is between our brains functioning in a mental way and the it...
June 22, 2019 at 11:52
It's not meant as a value judgment, or as something with value connotations, although it is meant to "demystify" or "demythologize" the process to an ...
June 22, 2019 at 11:41
What I mean by "rearranging" is that with the car, for example, you're taking some metal and plastic and rubber and electronics, etc. that already exi...
June 22, 2019 at 11:01
Synonyms for "phenomenon" include occurrence, event, happening, fact, situation, circumstance, experience, case, incident, episode, sight, appearance,...
June 21, 2019 at 22:46
Did you award Up a gold star?
June 21, 2019 at 21:05
Yes. The two categories exhaust all existents. That was simple. ;-)
June 21, 2019 at 20:14
Sure. Aren't you rearranging those, then?
June 21, 2019 at 19:19
You could make it, "Is it possible to develop a heuristic that can predict widespread consensuses about what's interesting, at least within a limited ...
June 21, 2019 at 17:09
What are you building the building blocks out of?
June 21, 2019 at 17:05
Re subject/predicate form, it's simply a matter of (a) what we're referring to/what we're pointing at, and (b) what we want to say about what we're po...
June 21, 2019 at 13:21
Thinking about the world, including observed, already-extant language use, structures language. (Re "substance," the idea of "substance" sans properti...
June 21, 2019 at 13:18
Single-celled organism? Less cells to worry about.
June 21, 2019 at 13:13
The parts are things like pitches, durations (rhythms), timbres, etc. Or colors, shapes, textures. Or characters (with parts like personality traits, ...
June 21, 2019 at 13:04
As someone who does creative work for a living, working with lots of other creative folks, and who has done that for decades, I don't really think it ...
June 21, 2019 at 12:44
The probability of the answer being "No" is 1. "Interesting" is a judgment that an individual makes. Sometimes it seems to me that there are people wh...
June 21, 2019 at 12:43
Creativity: basically rearranging things and seeing what it would be like if I put baubles on it versus removing baubles.
June 21, 2019 at 12:40
If "'objective' is 'whatever one is willing to accept'" then how does that do any of the work that people usually want to do with the notion of object...
June 21, 2019 at 12:15
Physicalism is NOT subservience in any regard to the science of physics. By the way, re saying "Again this shows your physicalist prejudice," I'm a ph...
June 21, 2019 at 12:11
He asked you what would be the alternative. You didn't tell him, aside from telling us what it wouldn't be.
June 21, 2019 at 12:09
You can claim they're logically and semantically identical, of course. Now can you explain how they are, explain how that works, etc.? We'll go over t...
June 21, 2019 at 12:06
Yes, but first we need to go over what the "rules" for explanations are going to be. Can you do that with me? Also, are you going to get to your alter...
June 21, 2019 at 12:04
"Not identical" does not amount to "completely different" (in the sense of "completely dissimilar"). Because I'm not saying anything contradictory. Th...
June 21, 2019 at 12:02
I'm not paying enough attention to sports stuff I'm trying to watch, so further replies will have to wait until my morning.
June 21, 2019 at 00:57
I have no idea what you have in mind there.
June 21, 2019 at 00:54
Yes. And indeed that's the case, a la it being a nominalistic truism that two instantiations of "the same" anything are not actually identical.
June 21, 2019 at 00:53
You're misunderstanding. This isn't about proving anything. I'm stating an ontological account of how logical and semantic spaces can be physical. In ...
June 21, 2019 at 00:48
They can be physical a la an ontological analysis of what they actually are as existents, which is a set of brain states in persons. So the difference...
June 21, 2019 at 00:36
Logical or semantic space can be physical, though. So what would be the ontological difference between physical logical or semantic space and nonphysi...
June 21, 2019 at 00:30
Can you explain it, ontologically, in a manner that's coherent to you and that doesn't simply consist of negations ("not physical" etc. )?
June 21, 2019 at 00:24
It's a fiction that the UN is located at 405 East 42nd Street? lol
June 21, 2019 at 00:22
"This exists someplace that isn't physical" is what's absurd. The idea of that is completely incoherent. There isn't anything that's nonphysical. It's...
June 21, 2019 at 00:19
In one sense of the UN, it's at 405 East 42nd Street, New York, NY.
June 21, 2019 at 00:18
The notion of a locationless existent (or subsistent, or whatever one would like to propose) is incoherent.
June 21, 2019 at 00:16
By pointing to locations and noting that there are no abstracts there.
June 21, 2019 at 00:13
As I've mentioned many times, I always type my points.
June 21, 2019 at 00:12
Can't say that I'm eligible to join your club for that, unfortunately.
June 21, 2019 at 00:11
Seriously, it's on my screen when I look at this thread.
June 21, 2019 at 00:03
Very funny.
June 21, 2019 at 00:02
Weird. On my screen, those words are there, under his name, in the first post, and the way I put "Evolution means . . . the absence of morality" in my...
June 21, 2019 at 00:01
All we need in order to negate the premise of the initial post of the thread.
June 20, 2019 at 23:58
I don't at all categorically agree with it, for one.
June 20, 2019 at 23:57
Where do you think that fifty-digit integers that have not been written down or spoken are located?
June 20, 2019 at 23:55
Are you disagreeing with "Matias wrote that 'Evolution means . . . the absence of morality'"?
June 20, 2019 at 23:53