You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Terrapin Station

Comments

Well, because the dialogue presented said nothing at all about that. I was presenting a more challenging comment from the non-believer for the context...
October 16, 2016 at 11:49
Which is a complete non-sequitur, hence the need for cleverer interlocutors in a dialogue like this.
October 16, 2016 at 11:34
The greatness of anything is never "more than" merely a subjective opinion. ("More than" is in quotation marks because there's always a connotation fr...
October 16, 2016 at 11:31
If only it weren't incorrect that what I said was incorrect. Some of us disagree that "Bob Dylan's music is great" doesn't amount to--"functionally" o...
October 16, 2016 at 11:27
Time is simply (the ontological process(es) of) change or motion. Its "speed" is simply a measurement of one change or motion against another change o...
October 16, 2016 at 02:08
Which I read as saying that something of Everest's stature hardly needs a medal to bolster it. The medal pales in comparison--it's more of an honor fo...
October 16, 2016 at 00:00
Nice one.
October 15, 2016 at 21:05
??? Bob Dylan sings, plays guitar and plays harmonica. He can also play bass and keyboards. That makes him a musician.
October 15, 2016 at 21:04
"Rigor"? Anyway, I like him just as much as a singer, frontman, etc. as I like Dylan, and I like him almost as much as a lyricist.. I don't think he w...
October 15, 2016 at 12:50
There's a difference between an entertainer who doesn't play an instrument and one who does, of course. There's no difference between an enterainer wh...
October 15, 2016 at 12:45
Which is basically a version of a "no true Scotsman" or "true metal/false metal" argument. One is saying that one is going to refuse to call a differe...
October 14, 2016 at 23:47
I was simply saying something lighthearted (though serious) about his "we." I don't feel that aesthetic judgments are not merely matters of taste. Cer...
October 14, 2016 at 23:45
Even if I were to agree with that, presenting it with attitude as if you're looking for a response to an exam probably isn't coextensive with presenti...
October 14, 2016 at 22:54
You've answered a couple yes, even though it was like pulling teeth. But it's not as if I have some minimum bar you need to pass and then I'll just ig...
October 14, 2016 at 22:48
Sure, but I'm not participating in a test or something like that. That's not a game I'm interested in playing. If you're interested in a good-faith, m...
October 14, 2016 at 22:45
You have a weird aversion to answering questions. It must be like a control thing for you or something, where you feel like you're being controlled or...
October 14, 2016 at 22:43
Can't in what sense?
October 14, 2016 at 22:35
Aesthetics was one of my areas of specialization, so yeah.
October 14, 2016 at 22:34
Right, so you believe that you know what I'm talking about contra what's in my mind?
October 14, 2016 at 22:32
Thanks for answering finally. Okay, so when I talk about idealism, I'm not talking about a sentence. Insofar as you see it as a sentence, we're talkin...
October 14, 2016 at 22:28
Kant should speak for himself. Well, and then we'll try to guess what he thinks as he continually revises it.
October 14, 2016 at 22:11
Given your inability or bad-attitude approach--whichever it is--to answer a simple yes or no question, why should I expend the time and effort to do a...
October 14, 2016 at 21:59
I like how everything devolves into a meta-discussion when you're involved, by the way.
October 14, 2016 at 21:55
It's just a question. It's not leading anywhere. Yes or no, are you saying that idealism is a sentence/statement? In my opinion, one is not capable of...
October 14, 2016 at 21:54
"Are you claiming that idealism is a sentence" is a yes or no question. Try typing less in response to a yes or no question.
October 14, 2016 at 21:48
Are you claiming that idealism is a sentence?
October 14, 2016 at 21:44
Gee, it's surprising that you'd believe that you know what I'm claiming better than I do. </facetiousness>
October 14, 2016 at 21:41
If only someone were claiming that the proposition "only mental phenomena exist" entailed the proposition "only my mental phenomena exist."
October 14, 2016 at 19:56
Great writer and singer and musician (and bandleader, producer, etc.) In my opinion.
October 14, 2016 at 19:14
And haha re reading my comment as implying an objection to the idea of anything following from sentences in general.
October 14, 2016 at 19:02
Haha re the idea of it being a matter of following from sentences.
October 14, 2016 at 17:59
Well, and the point isn't anything about logic anyway. It's about what it would take, based on what I've observed about Michael's personality, behavio...
October 14, 2016 at 16:36
Right. That sort of overconfidence in your abilities is just the problem though. There's no way to break through that via what's usually done on messa...
October 14, 2016 at 16:14
So you won't play along a la a Socratic dialogue because it's "doing my work for me" in your view. What if it turned out that you really would only be...
October 14, 2016 at 16:09
And the reason that you won't just play along is?
October 14, 2016 at 16:00
I can't explain it to you so that you'll understand it unless you play along. Why are you against playing along? is there some moral objection to it o...
October 14, 2016 at 15:56
In other words, you won't play along. Not surprising.
October 14, 2016 at 15:54
I just wrote "To demonstrate that, you need to play along, or you'll never understand it." I'm not saying that in idealists' views this is the case, b...
October 14, 2016 at 15:52
it's not separate to what I'm discussing at the moment, though. It's what I'm interested in. And it has to do with idealism entailing solipsism. To de...
October 14, 2016 at 15:48
I want to get into details though. Infer it how? Based on what?
October 14, 2016 at 15:43
So some non-solipsistic idealists believe that things (can) exist insofar as they know they don't experience them. How would they know this?
October 14, 2016 at 15:40
I didn't say it follows. I asked you a question. Would idealists then say "Things I experience don't exist FOR ME when I don't experience them"? So ye...
October 14, 2016 at 15:33
So they'd agree with "things I experience don't exist for me when I don't experience them"?
October 14, 2016 at 15:23
How do folks figure that they're experiencing other persons' experiences? (Whatever other folks are when they're just experiences)
October 14, 2016 at 15:17
I don't see why we shouldn't consider lyrics literature. We don't need a category for lyrics that separates them from literature, as if they're not li...
October 14, 2016 at 15:11
You need a more clever non-believer. For example, take this passage: What the non-believer should have said was this: Freedom could still be granted w...
October 14, 2016 at 15:08
Okay, but so then why is the human condition irreducibly, objectively unacceptable in your view? In other words, what is unacceptable about it?
October 14, 2016 at 15:00
I don't think that the idea of goals makes any sense outside of personal preference. (Cooperative goals are just a matter of people having the same pe...
October 14, 2016 at 14:58
I'm not following. Why would it be unacceptable that you can only perceive the human condition to be the case through personal experience?
October 13, 2016 at 17:18
Okay, but why is the human condition irreducibly, objectively unacceptable in your view? (And what do you do about it if that's the case?--It seems li...
October 13, 2016 at 16:51