You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Terrapin Station

Comments

In: Qualia  — view comment
Sure, say that you're experiencing the walls melting. Well, that's both what you appear to be experiencing and what you're really experiencing, since ...
October 27, 2016 at 13:58
In: Qualia  — view comment
There's not a difference in my opinion. There can be a difference in what's really going on that is causing whatever experience they're having, but th...
October 27, 2016 at 13:29
In: Qualia  — view comment
Right, so then we couldn't say that the intentional stance is the same thing as what exhibits behaviorally.
October 27, 2016 at 11:12
I would say that the clock actually IS time, just as all processes (all change/motion) are.
October 27, 2016 at 10:57
In: Qualia  — view comment
Umm . . .
October 27, 2016 at 02:17
In: Qualia  — view comment
That ontologically, concepts, qualia, abstractions etc. are identical to brain states. That's an ontological fact. As such it doesn't matter whether w...
October 27, 2016 at 02:17
In: Qualia  — view comment
But then first person experience is an object, since it exists in the world, and like everything else, it is the properties of particular matter, in p...
October 27, 2016 at 02:12
In: Qualia  — view comment
Even if that were so, it would be about making claims as such. But that has no impact on what's the case ontologically. I'm saying that they're identi...
October 27, 2016 at 01:25
Yes. So I can date all of those women, visit all of those places, listen to (and write) all of that music, read (and write) all of those books, see al...
October 26, 2016 at 20:41
When I say it's not any specific processes, I'm saying that it's not just some subset of specific processes, while not being other processes. For exam...
October 26, 2016 at 18:59
What sorts of religious experiences did you have?
October 26, 2016 at 18:15
Yeah, in a way, but that doesn't mean that it's not actual. It's process in general, not any specific process (like say just a clock ticking). Or in o...
October 26, 2016 at 16:37
You're asking as if there's a correct answer to be discovered. There isn't. Whether one values honesty, what honesty one values and to what extent, et...
October 26, 2016 at 16:25
Well, individual persons are the arbiters of that, because "best" is necessarily subjective.
October 26, 2016 at 15:54
Man is the "measure" of some things. That includes individual persons as well as persons collectively. There are objective things, too, though.
October 26, 2016 at 15:51
I don't understand the apparent distinction you're making. There are only actual processes. "Process itself" is actual processes. "Process itself" mak...
October 26, 2016 at 12:35
In: Qualia  — view comment
How would you define "object"/"object of experience" here?
October 26, 2016 at 12:33
In: Qualia  — view comment
You continually claim that materialists philosophers must come to such and such conclusion, where that flies in the face of the fact that I'm a materi...
October 26, 2016 at 12:32
In: Qualia  — view comment
Surely he thinks that they can exhibit behaviorally, or that they're just the sorts of things that sometimes do exhibit behaviorally, no? Although if ...
October 26, 2016 at 12:24
In: Qualia  — view comment
Which isn't a problem. I'm not denying abstractions. I'm saying that they're particular brain states (namely, the brain states that amount to concepts...
October 26, 2016 at 12:07
In: Qualia  — view comment
First, that it's identical isn't a statement of logic or anything like that. It's an ontological fact. Re logic relying on abstraction, sure--I'd agre...
October 25, 2016 at 21:00
I don't buy innate ideas OR ideas that purely obtain in response to experience, either. It seems to me that all ideas would be due to a combination of...
October 25, 2016 at 19:50
Using archaeological studies to guess what early hominid language would have been like semantically seems particularly ridiculous to me.
October 25, 2016 at 16:40
Wait: what is "basic language" supposed to be practically? Is it just a hypothetical construction, an "imagine if we had this" or "imagine if we limit...
October 25, 2016 at 13:47
In: Qualia  — view comment
Re changing the topic and the video you posted: (a) I don't buy that there is anything that isn't a particular. I'm a nominalist. (a1) Obviously, nomi...
October 25, 2016 at 13:19
In: Qualia  — view comment
What does any of that have to do with whether "what we take to be qualia, what appears to us as first-person experience, really is the snap, crackle a...
October 25, 2016 at 13:10
Processes (you don't need the word "dynamic"--processes are necessarily dynamic) have a speed relative to other processes. That includes time, because...
October 25, 2016 at 10:22
In: Qualia  — view comment
Andrew was saying that what you describe there is just materialism. It's not eliminativist. For example, I'm a physicalist/"materialist," but not an e...
October 25, 2016 at 10:17
In: Qualia  — view comment
What you take to be sufficient to believe or not believe a claim can't be anything other than a personal opinion.
October 24, 2016 at 17:54
In: Qualia  — view comment
"Studies like this"--where we're talking about someone in a vegetative state. Usually we're not talking about someone in a vegetative state. If you do...
October 24, 2016 at 15:48
In: Qualia  — view comment
The difference is that in the one case we're talking about people who are conscious and who can give us reports of their first-person experience. (Whi...
October 24, 2016 at 13:37
In: Qualia  — view comment
I answered this in the post you're responding to. (I'll just assume that you answer posts as you read them rather than reading the whole thing first, ...
October 24, 2016 at 13:23
In: Qualia  — view comment
The quale, qualia being a term conventionally limited to mental contexts, is produced by the phenomena of electromagnetic radation being reflected off...
October 24, 2016 at 12:16
In: Qualia  — view comment
First off, you're apparently using "solipsism" to refer to a belief that one can't know that anyone else has a mind. There's a problem with that. We c...
October 24, 2016 at 12:04
In: Qualia  — view comment
What do you see as the relevance of the Feynman quote--that your brilliance is being too easily dismissed?
October 24, 2016 at 00:32
In: Qualia  — view comment
Then I suppose I have to suggest insanity.
October 24, 2016 at 00:07
In: Qualia  — view comment
But studies like this: "In the 2006 study, Owen and his colleagues used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate if a 23-year-old w...
October 23, 2016 at 21:29
In: Qualia  — view comment
You're joking, right?
October 23, 2016 at 21:25
In: Qualia  — view comment
Why would you believe that people are conscious while in a coma? Anyway, I would agree that there's a difference between consciousness, when present, ...
October 23, 2016 at 19:48
LOL
October 23, 2016 at 19:21
In: Qualia  — view comment
What would you say the difference is? Are you referring to reasoning with "high level consciousness" maybe?
October 23, 2016 at 19:20
In: Qualia  — view comment
Thanks for at least attempting an answer here. First, it's better to link to the actual paper, rather than a news article about the paper. The actual ...
October 23, 2016 at 19:17
Consider my surprise, after you associated genius with having to adapt to abuse, bullying, etc., that you note that you were bullied. Haha--really I'm...
October 23, 2016 at 17:38
In: Qualia  — view comment
Here's what you claimed: "The most recent evidence in physics is that the brain maximizes entropy" I'm saying that's b.s.. There's an easy way to show...
October 23, 2016 at 17:22
Not in my life. Nothing sacred, no sacred cows.
October 23, 2016 at 16:42
In: Qualia  — view comment
I'm calling bs on you, wuliheron. Let's see a reference to one of the studies you're talking about.
October 23, 2016 at 16:41
In: Qualia  — view comment
So it's not part of computability theory, which is a branch of mathematical logic?
October 23, 2016 at 12:10
In: Qualia  — view comment
What would that even mean? (And physics research on brains?) Maybe if you'd link to the research you have in mind, it would make more sense than your ...
October 23, 2016 at 12:03
In: Qualia  — view comment
It seems like you just didn't read my response that closely. I said, "I certainly buy that there are unconscious brain processes." So yeah, the person...
October 22, 2016 at 20:56
Yeah, jokey strawmen is a good way to have a conversation when challenged. Anyway, re what words refer to, that's determined by what an individual has...
October 22, 2016 at 20:05