You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Terrapin Station

Comments

Why would you think that I buy the principle of sufficient reason? I'm challenging the notion that there's any good justification for it.
June 21, 2017 at 20:12
I don't agree with this at all. In my view, there are no objective facts re whether something is the Ship of Theseus at time Tx or not. It's simply a ...
June 21, 2017 at 14:29
I'm calling foul there already. I don't think it's at all a consensus any longer that other animals do not have languages. Human language doesn't lite...
June 21, 2017 at 14:21
I don't believe that we have the faintest idea whether that's true. And if the dog is making a mental association, then the dog is capable of thinking...
June 21, 2017 at 14:15
I'm talking about this from more of a psychological angle though--whether one feels there's a need for a background reason for every x or not. Either ...
June 21, 2017 at 14:03
??? It's not that complicated. Either for every x you need a background reason or you do not. If you need a background reason for every x, you're out ...
June 21, 2017 at 12:03
Maybe it's more that things can be beautiful in different ways or for different reasons. For example, with musical harmony, there's beautiful consonan...
June 20, 2017 at 20:19
What do you find ugly about Ravel's Sonatine No. 3, for example?
June 20, 2017 at 18:53
To me, no. I don't know why it's so difficult to communicate this. For me, "ugly" and "beautiful" are opposites.
June 20, 2017 at 18:40
Guernica isn't one of my favorite Picasso paintings, but this is, for example: http://www.pablo-ruiz-picasso.net/images/works/1472.jpg The point is th...
June 20, 2017 at 18:20
Whether something is ugly or beautiful or whatever is subjective. I'm saying that when I think something is beautiful, I don't think that parts of it ...
June 20, 2017 at 17:56
But I'm saying it wouldn't be ugly to me in that context.
June 20, 2017 at 17:44
Okay, so you're just telling us something about yourself and not beauty in general then? That's interesting for what it is, but it's difficult for me ...
June 20, 2017 at 17:43
The problem isn't that your zeal will be deflated. It's that you literally will run out of time. You, as an individual, are probably only going to be ...
June 20, 2017 at 17:40
?? I don't think about morality at all in connection with beauty.
June 20, 2017 at 17:34
That's way off re my reactions. I don't think that anything has a purpose--at least not an objective purpose. Purposes are simply a way that some peop...
June 20, 2017 at 17:33
I don't know if I'd agree with that . . . but just because the stuff that other folks are calling "ugly" I'm not going to think is ugly if the work ov...
June 20, 2017 at 17:28
You'd have to post it here or someplace that I don't have to sign up for.
June 20, 2017 at 17:11
I don't have any love for Democrats, either. I'd like to see the whole system trashed.
June 20, 2017 at 15:03
I'm still waiting for anything Trump has done along the lines of useful/practical things with respect to his constituency, things that positively affe...
June 20, 2017 at 15:00
You can hire someone to do all of that for you. The biggest barrier to running for president is monetary.
June 20, 2017 at 14:02
If you can't do anything in six months, I don't consider that effective.
June 20, 2017 at 13:24
What I consider effectiveness is him getting particular things done--useful/practical things with respect to his constituency, things that positively ...
June 20, 2017 at 13:22
I don't think it's a waste of time, but I think it's sorely misconceived to believe that there MUST be some "background" reason for natural law being ...
June 20, 2017 at 13:18
What in the world would some nonsensical guess about IQ have to do with anything?
June 20, 2017 at 12:45
Effective with regard to what? What has he done so far?
June 20, 2017 at 12:43
Sometimes this board seems like the philosophy equivalent of a physics board where people mostly present their "free energy" and "time cube" proposals...
June 20, 2017 at 12:42
Or, someone could simply say that a paradox is a statement that has alternating truth values in "layer logic." And then you've got the same problem yo...
June 20, 2017 at 12:39
You're writing this in a world where Donald Trump is president. I doubt many people believe that holding a leadership position denotes effectiveness, ...
June 20, 2017 at 12:30
I don't understand that sentence. What's "the reason that the association is not about any of the other elemental constituents"? And yes, I'm a physic...
June 20, 2017 at 12:21
It need not come from either. It can be a brute fact of the world. That's the whole point of it being natural law, really.
June 20, 2017 at 12:17
The false dichotomy was your "where order comes from" comment. You said it either comes from consciousness or chance. A third option, that's not consc...
June 20, 2017 at 11:34
Well, obviously human laws are created by us. But that's different than natural laws (assuming there are such things).
June 19, 2017 at 22:46
How would you find that "in our human nature"? Are you just saying that it's something that people uncritically assume?
June 19, 2017 at 21:25
Well, but did you see the description of my schooling?
June 19, 2017 at 20:49
What sort of school did you go to? Public/private? In what country?
June 19, 2017 at 20:37
Where in nature do you find that "if there's law, there must be a lawgiver"?
June 19, 2017 at 20:24
Per what?
June 19, 2017 at 18:55
Natural law.
June 19, 2017 at 18:25
Wait. First, people create concepts. They're mental events--namely, abstractions a la types/universals/natural kinds/categories/etc. You're usually go...
June 19, 2017 at 13:30
I'd have to basically write a book. I'm not going to do that on a message board. As it is it's a pet peeve of mine that people write such long posts o...
June 19, 2017 at 12:04
Yeah, I have my own, very idiosyncratic system I'd put in place instead, but it's not something I can detail very well in short message board posts. M...
June 19, 2017 at 11:55
It sounds like you had some poor teachers, unfortunately. I was taught from the beginning--well, or at least since Jr. High School, that (a) empirical...
June 19, 2017 at 11:23
Your first post begins this way: "Imagine, if you will, a cosmic leaver; on one end, the concept of zero, and on the other, the concept of everything....
June 19, 2017 at 11:17
No, it doesn't imply that false dichotomy, and I posted as much literally about ten times or so in this thread (although to that "Thinker" dude rather...
June 19, 2017 at 11:04
It's part of what the association is about. It's not itself the association qua the association. If I write the sentence "The cow jumped over the moon...
June 19, 2017 at 01:45
The issue was simply that I disagree with this claim: "Nothing organizes labor and resources as well as the market." I wasn't saying anything about "n...
June 19, 2017 at 01:05
Can't you read? It's difficult to have a conversation like this if someone can't read basic English. I wrote "All elements of the association, qua the...
June 19, 2017 at 01:03
I'd reply to you more quickly if you hit the "reply" button--that way I get a notification that you responded to me. We'd need to clarify exactly what...
June 19, 2017 at 01:01
My first comment was about not buying that "Nothing organizes labor and resources as well as the market." I pointed out a number of problems a la home...
June 19, 2017 at 00:54