Once again, this is a simple confusion. "Redness" (or the property of being red) is NOT IDENTICAL to the experience of red(ness). So it's quite silly ...
Okay, so moving on, we already answered this. They are non-identical instances of the phrases. Maybe it's not clear what you're asking, though. What s...
Then just ask that. Asking "what makes x and y identical" seems like you're asking for some sort of explanation of how it would work ontologically tha...
Your responses to this do not bode well for you wanting an editor, by the way. You won't even fix something simple that makes no sense as conventional...
I don't know how that question makes sense to you, really. In the first case we're naming two separate things ontologically. In the second case, we're...
Light refraction is something we're naming "color." I'm not saying that it's the same as the experience of color. I'm saying exactly the opposite of t...
So when you ask "And you wouldn’t answer in what sense you thought light refraction was the same as colour," you're asking me to say, "sight," "smell,...
With respect to this, I said this and you ignored it, which is why it went no further. You can't ignore it, then: "The question makes no sense. Are yo...
Didn't I just explain over and over that the experience of a color is not the same thing as the color? So we'd not think that the experience of a colo...
They don't have experiences based on those brain phenomena. They have experiences which are identical to those brain phenomena. The experiences are wh...
The experience of color, and all mental phenomena, are identical to brain phenomena. Or are you asking for something like the schematics of exactly wh...
I'm not saying anything using the phrase "material basis" for one. The light refraction is color. The experience of color is different than light refr...
Why would you equate anything with the experience of that thing? That's such a ridiculous approach, to figure that everything is identical to the the ...
It's not "corresponding to the color red," it is the color red. That's not to say that it's the experience of the color red if no one is experiencing ...
It is itself color. Color is not identical to the experience of color. You're conflating color (in general) and the experience of color. It's like I'm...
Wait, first, the brain is colorless, odorless?? Brains definitely have a color and would have an odor if you were to smell them. What that has to do w...
It's not as if this is hard to figure out. If nothing is identical through time, then "Nothing is identical through time" isn't identical through time...
The answer changes even though I say the so-called "same thing," because nothing is literally identical through time. The idea of something being the ...
I'd say that we know that they're physical processes of the brain. I wouldn't say that it's impossible that they could be something else. But there wo...
Sometimes you're just presenting an alternate way to look at or feel about things, by the way. For example, I'll often say things like, "I disagree. I...
Right, so re your concept of "iron," more than one "iron atom" is necessary to have "iron" (without "atom" appended). So the essence of iron for you i...
Well, I just mentioned two things that we can do: (a) make it so that politics can't be an ongoing career, or (b) make it so that the requirement to p...
Rather than seeing it as "short-sighted" versus "long-sighted," I think it's more a matter of politics being a career for politicians. Politicians und...
Comments