You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Relativist

Comments

The sort of thing that clearly has had a "start" are merely configurations of fundamental stuff. The fundamental stuff itself has no apparent "start",...
July 05, 2019 at 17:44
Your first sentence is a definition: a brute fact is something that exists without a reason for existing. But why believe that brute facts can only ex...
July 05, 2019 at 17:19
I grant that (in principle) God could have created the universe 6000 years ago (or 6 seconds ago, for that matter) but this historical explanation doe...
July 05, 2019 at 16:29
Your focus on "explanation" seems a red-herring. Explanations are post-hoc semantic descriptions. The leap to a conclusion that explainability is a me...
July 05, 2019 at 16:09
IMO, the difficulty is due to the vagueness of the term "consciousness". Broadly speaking, we can consider Data, my cat, and myself to each possess a ...
July 05, 2019 at 15:37
Your scenario seems possible as an ontology, but I don't see how scientific investigation of fundamental physics could uncover it.
July 05, 2019 at 14:03
If it is ever acheived, a ToE will be a theory that describes the most fundamental structure of material reality and how higher levels of structure (e...
July 05, 2019 at 05:50
I object to your claim that "explanation must exist". First, I'll note that this contradicts your definition of existence (" Existence adds a new note...
July 04, 2019 at 22:27
It is presumptuous to assume there's a reason for consciousness BESIDES the how. Why think that? Are you looking for an excuse to believe it "had to b...
May 30, 2019 at 03:45
Words refer to concepts, most of which are fuzzy, but still have a core of agreed meaning. You noted the biological definition of life - and I see not...
May 27, 2019 at 20:11
So, since there was no point in having a meeting, Trump decided to make a show of it. Sounds Trumpian.
May 23, 2019 at 05:32
But he wasn't under oath, so that's OK....that seems to be the way Trumpists view it. Even if no crime is ever charged, and no impeachment ever procee...
May 23, 2019 at 05:28
It's not moot, because the fundamental components of the world are particles that do not behave as we'd expect from our experience in the macro world....
May 22, 2019 at 04:39
Determined does not equate to intended. Although it may be reasonable to assume the past is finite, the future is potentially infinite - so even this ...
May 22, 2019 at 03:28
You're attacking a poorly constructed strawman. Physicalism does not entail objects being contained in the mind. [ "Solve the unresolved questions..."...
May 22, 2019 at 03:07
You"re going to need more than this: 1. If Physicalism then not(teleology) 2. Teleology 3. Therefore not(physicalism) Physicalism needn't even be true...
May 22, 2019 at 02:44
Two problems with this: 1) You are assuming there exist final causes, and then accounting for "will" with that paradigm. This does not establish it. 2...
May 22, 2019 at 00:07
LOL! Indeed I have, and I agree completely.
May 21, 2019 at 16:58
Because it prima facie violates the law of non-contradiction. Justification of belief in the Trinity requires ad hoc metaphysical assumptions that lac...
May 21, 2019 at 16:35
I somewhat agree that "final cause" connotes teleology, and teleology connotes intentionality. However, I see no reason to think there is any reason t...
May 21, 2019 at 14:27
I believe original sin was a Christian invention, a narrative to rationalize the execution of Jesus - making it a "sacrifice", just like sacrificing a...
May 21, 2019 at 14:08
The ostensible existence of a "trinity" is a good reason to doubt the truth of Christianity. I agree that the doctrine derived from the need to reconc...
May 21, 2019 at 14:02
My views are rooted in the failure to pass the Immigration Bill of 2013. It wasn't perfect, but it was a good start. It passed the Senate (14 of 46 Re...
May 20, 2019 at 05:27
News to me, and sounds like an odd definition. Determinism, as typically used, is ontological or metaphysical. You're defining it epistemologically. I...
May 20, 2019 at 04:39
Be sure to contact Alexander Vilenken and let him know he's wasting his time. Thanks for the discussion.
May 19, 2019 at 02:04
False. You are simply redefining the cosmological model I defined. Here's a paper in which Cosmologist Alexander Vilenkin discusses the general progra...
May 18, 2019 at 19:38
It is false to claim "SOA0 must have permanent existence else its something from nothing." I've demonstrated it multiple times, but you just continue ...
May 18, 2019 at 17:38
It's argument from ignorance to insist there are no causes just because we're ignorant of them. You're focusing too much on the unobservable. I also s...
May 18, 2019 at 14:02
No it doesn't. The behavior may be due to a complex set of factors that are unobserved or unobservable. As an extreme example, consider a deterministi...
May 18, 2019 at 02:37
OK, I can accept the possibility of such an intelligence being metaphysically possible. No. Please consider my description of SOA0: it exists uncaused...
May 17, 2019 at 21:36
That sounds like a confusion of ontology and epistemology. Things exist irrespective of whether anyone has experienced, and labelled, them. Things hav...
May 17, 2019 at 20:51
It is indeed something like a dumb version of your first cause. There's no example of an intelligence existing independently of something physical. A ...
May 17, 2019 at 13:19
I can't consider existence a property, because that would imply there are objects that don't happen to have the property "existence". But there are no...
May 17, 2019 at 00:25
All cosmological theories that explain the big bang agree that there would be multiple big bangs. Is there evidence? Maybe, maybe not. Here's an examp...
May 16, 2019 at 20:58
I see, you are defining it from the perspective of a theist. Personally, I don't believe there exists a soul or spirit.
May 16, 2019 at 17:55
So your issue is specifically the high energy/low entropy state at the big bang. i.e.: you're pointing to the need to explain the big bang. I've point...
May 16, 2019 at 17:51
The results of evolution are not the product of necessity, but regardless, free will is not an illusion- it just isn't what you think it is. Free will...
May 16, 2019 at 15:43
Amoeba have life, but I see no reason to think they have a free will. Are you actually seeking the definition of an individual human life (a person)?
May 16, 2019 at 15:27
That everyday experience is entropy. What's the problem? My model is consistent with it. I noted that the initial state was unstable, consequently it ...
May 16, 2019 at 15:23
Not at all. Striking down Roe v Wade does not outlaw abortion, it just permits individual states to do so. Trump and Kavanaugh can fly their Alabama g...
May 16, 2019 at 14:42
This was passed for one reason: to make its way to the Supreme Court, to give them an opportunity to strike down Roe v Wade. Pat Robertson thinks this...
May 16, 2019 at 05:04
I suggest D.M. Armstrong's Sketch for a Systematic Metaphysics. Armstrong was an influential materialist philosopher who developed a comprehensive mat...
May 16, 2019 at 04:55
OK, but if you're going to claim A is more probable than B, you have to analyze both A and B - seriously entertain both possibilities. You didn't; you...
May 15, 2019 at 22:06
You ignored my response: 1) moving toward higher entropy is irrelevant. This view of "equilibrium" is a future state, and consistent with my model. 2)...
May 15, 2019 at 18:58
Are you referring to entropy? How is that a problem? Are you overlooking that the total energy of the universe and/or multiverse is zero? Overlooking ...
May 15, 2019 at 14:08
Hume's beliefs about causation are antiquated. He didn't consider that there might actually exist natural law. Modern physicalist philosophers (e.g. A...
May 15, 2019 at 05:17
IMO, Trump is the apotheosis of narcissism. He wants to "win", and will cheat to do so. This alone doesn't imply he will harm the U.S. The bigger dang...
May 15, 2019 at 05:08
Stating "I think your model leads to equilibrium" is worthless unless you can make a case for that necessarily being the case. Every cosmological hypo...
May 14, 2019 at 22:07
You are still making the unsupported assertion that everything that exists has a cause of its existence. That is an assumption that cannot be shown to...
May 14, 2019 at 16:26
You are supposed to be finding a logical flaw in my account, but you are again just reasserting your own assumptions. You seem to accept that there is...
May 14, 2019 at 15:30