I'm not denying the fact of new representations. For example, a new model of a car is still just a car. A new-born human is just a human. By creativit...
Yes, we do figure out a lot of new stuff. But, they are only new to us. Mathematics may seem like a new creation until we realise that all of its rela...
I think, first, we imitate the already existing methodology used in scientific investigations. This is because, fundamentally, they are based on utili...
Personally, I'm not adept at the processes of mind but I'm trying to figure out whether it could be a valid course of investigation. For example, scie...
I think our conception of God is largely defined by the limits we attribute to ourselves. For example, omni-potence/science/presence is in comparison ...
Your axioms originate from assumptions. Well, no wonder they make no sense. And, by the way, there's a difference between a postulate and and an unfou...
Axioms only cycle in your imaginary universe. Laws are connected to the phenomena they govern. But, that connection does not give them the attributes ...
Suppose everything is uncertain, why would it cause you anxiety? Anxiety would mean you have interpreted something as certain within all the uncertain...
I think the whole point rests on the idea of self-discipline. The mind (thoughts) and emotions are tools which we use e.g. for self-expression, to eng...
I've tried to read a little on 4D mechanics and I think one of the key aspects of a higher dimension is its permeability of the lower dimensions. For ...
On page 9, you wrote, And on page 11, you've written, What makes you think your mistaken assumptions will become right just because you repeat them? T...
I never said that. An equation is a premise with a defined path to the conclusion. It is not an identity. P=P is an equation (a simplistic one compare...
Somewhat true. I don't like video games and have no reason other than they don't compare to actual games. But the amish resistance is really intense. ...
The internet is just fine. It's just that we've never had such a perspective before. There has never been another time in human history (from the reco...
I think, from the previous verses in the chapter, the light is in reference to God's wisdom, the Word, and its influence on mankind. It's like a riddl...
In terms of thinking about thinking, can we say that the mind follows the path of intelligence and that simplicity is one of the aspects on such a pat...
This is not a value. It is an equation. P=4, therefore 4 is the value of P 2+2=P, 2+2=4 therefore, from the above given equations, P=4. That has nothi...
Music: Flower duet from the opera Lakmé by Léo Delibes (whether opera is part of the classical genre or not, I wouldn't know. I doubt it's even old en...
That is one of those metaphysical problems. Is there a 'self' who is the thinker? I don't know. As far as I can tell awareness and mind seem to be int...
This is philosophy. So, the premise does not have an answer, it has a conclusion. And yes, the premise and conclusion are ALIKE. That is why it makes ...
Please, you think your petty attempts at semantics will confuse me. P=P means that the premise P (on the left side of the equation) is equal (=) to th...
Have some self-respect dude. This argument is sub par for anyone in this forum. You are the only one with this misguided notion. The duality of a part...
That is not what I said. A particle is a particle. It cannot be anything else. Wave-particle duality is the concept in quantum mechanics that every pa...
This is nonsense. Just because it proves you wrong doesn't mean it is wrong. It's been applied that for as long as the law exists. That you do not rea...
Like I keep telling you, you've misunderstood everything. When the cyclic nature of some events is realised, it may seem very captivating but it does ...
I've already given you examples of what the law of identity means to our understanding of phenomena. I even used you as an example. The statements are...
If you can't substantiate your statements, what is their point? If your laws are just words without applications, how are they laws? Principles must b...
An assumption is not a definition. I'm saying those are not laws. They are your own imaginations. If they were laws they would be evident in the pheno...
This is your quote. You are the one who said it changes. Again, you are trying to mislead with your petty confusions. Prove this first before you give...
My point is the identity of a person remains the same. Which definition is that which occurs through the line, point and circle. State that definition...
This should be basic common sense. Were you someone else as a child? Or is it that you don't know what identity means. Zeno's paradox is based on hypo...
Don't change the subject. We're talking about the Law if Identity, P=P. This is not mathematics. It is your own nonsense. AGAIN, YOUR INTERPRETATION I...
No. That's not what it says. This is your own faulty interpretation. The elements governed by reality change. But reality remains itself. Just like we...
This is not Zeno's paradox. The law of identity deals with reality as it is. No matter the condition of that reality, whether real or illusion, it is ...
You are writing it in words but you are not proving it as it is observed in reality (in phenomena). So, there's no proof. What you've written has noth...
Comments