You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Devans99

Comments

If the event occurred once only in infinite time it must be unnatural. The rule is with infinite time, if an event is possible it happens an infinite ...
February 09, 2019 at 14:02
-'time could be infinite with matter/energy creation occurring at just one point in time and that's it' - so that would be an unnatural event caused b...
February 09, 2019 at 13:22
As I mentioned above: I think god, if he exists, exists outside our time so he would still be able to act without time to initiate the creation of our...
February 09, 2019 at 09:44
Well for example, if time was infinite then the number of seconds past so far is greater than any number; which is a contradiction, hence time is fini...
February 09, 2019 at 00:55
You are misunderstanding me; I believe time is finite and that finite time is the strongest evidence there is for a God. So therefore I am addressing ...
February 09, 2019 at 00:45
If time is finite then time must have been created by God (so I can rest my case and just address the time is infinite case). We have evidence of only...
February 09, 2019 at 00:40
If time is infinite and entropy increases with time, what else could happen but entropy reach a maximum? But we see a low entropy universe so if time ...
February 09, 2019 at 00:19
How else would you propose to reset entropy? It requires the contraction of space; IE the big crunch; there is no other way to lower entropy. An infin...
February 09, 2019 at 00:04
Entropy only increases with time. If time was infinite entropy would be at a maximum. It is not; so if time is infinite there must have be 'entropy re...
February 08, 2019 at 23:33
Correct, I'm not saying anything about the nature of God beyond his ability to create the universe. So he could be completely different to the normal ...
February 08, 2019 at 23:16
Existing requires coming into being. So stuff can’t have existed for ever; it must of been created. Modern cosmology points this way too; in eternal i...
February 08, 2019 at 22:49
If energy/matter were not created, there must be periodic entropy reset events (else entropy would be at a maximum by now). Those would be Big Bang/Bi...
February 08, 2019 at 22:25
If the creation event had no cause; it must be a naturally occurring event like quantum fluctuations. If it is a naturally occurring event, it should ...
January 30, 2019 at 10:24
The theory does not say. A common interpretation of the theory is some sort of natural event like a quantum fluctuation temporarily fluctuates the spe...
January 29, 2019 at 14:59
I don't think he had much of a choice. How would any God go about designing intelligent life? It's surely impossible even for Gods; we are just way to...
January 29, 2019 at 14:32
My argument is that it does require a creator. If eternal inflation was a natural event and time is infinite the there should be an infinite number of...
January 29, 2019 at 14:20
That depends on if cause and effect still have meaning outside of time; they might do in which case we could have an eternal (outside of time) God and...
January 29, 2019 at 13:47
The fact that there is one sort of reality we know about (the material world) does not exclude the possibility of alternative forms of reality. We are...
January 14, 2019 at 17:03
These solutions don't work in the material world: the entangled particles are (say) one light year apart in the material world so there is no way they...
January 14, 2019 at 15:35
The non-material substrate could be arranged differently so the entangled particles remain co-located in the substrate. Or FTL communication is possib...
January 14, 2019 at 14:51
4÷0 does not make sense. How can you split 4 loafs into 0 parts? So we have to exclude it from arithmetic for logical reasons. Apart from that, zero b...
January 14, 2019 at 14:12
To be fair I sited 4 separate ideas/theories that all point in the same direction. If you reject a non-material substrate, how would you explain quant...
January 13, 2019 at 18:38
But the one-on-one correspondence procedure yields nonsense like Galileo's paradox. And the continuum does not have a cardinality... Cantor should nev...
January 13, 2019 at 17:52
Can you give an example of something illogical from nature/reality? Yes but you cannot actually infinitely divide a line - it would take forever. So t...
January 13, 2019 at 17:22
I was a materialist but now I'm having second thoughts. Some sort of material/non-material hybrid is maybe what reality is. So not materialism and not...
January 13, 2019 at 17:07
Whats logical about ? + 1 = ? (implies 1 = 0)? In fact infinity is invariant under all arithmetic operations; what's logical about something that when...
January 13, 2019 at 17:03
But nature is logical so maths can explain it because it is logical also. Actual infinity is not a logical concept so does not fits in maths or nature...
January 13, 2019 at 16:08
And your attitude is isomorphic to an adherent of magic. How exactly is the universe meant to function without cause and effect, by magic? What mechan...
January 13, 2019 at 15:32
I just cannot countenance a non-deterministic interpretation and then many worlds Interpretation is IMO crazy so I'm staying with non-local hidden var...
January 13, 2019 at 14:48
I don't believe the wave function collapse is random, so there must be hidden variables in the non-material substrate. Everything is cause and effect ...
January 13, 2019 at 13:53
I don't think you can have finite time with the A theory. Then there would just be a start of time with nothing (no time) before it so it requires cre...
January 11, 2019 at 17:42
Geometry reflects reality. If we can't construct it geometrically, its probably does not exist. If you sub-divide a continuum you get two continua ide...
January 11, 2019 at 16:45
And what is your definition of a continuum? All the mathematical definitions I've seen use instances or short durations of some form. What do you mean...
January 11, 2019 at 15:59
I believe nature is fundamentally logical and that it can be accurately described using logic IE maths. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you but that's the ...
January 11, 2019 at 15:47
Which is not a number. Basic maths says there is no number X greater than all others because X+1>X. No infinite numbers. So my proof holds. Would you ...
January 11, 2019 at 15:36
I'll adopt an axiom of cause and effect and then argue that an infinite regression in time is impossible: 1. By the axiom of cause and effect, there w...
January 11, 2019 at 15:19
But A theory is incoherent also because an infinite regress is incoherent. B theory can be combined with finite spacetime to avoid any need for an inf...
January 11, 2019 at 15:11
Something always existing makes sense. You can't get something from nothing so something must have always existed. Could it be what always existed is ...
January 11, 2019 at 15:02
I'm not sure if time exists or not. I suspect it does. Some other arguments that it exists are given here: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/c...
January 11, 2019 at 14:45
To be fair, the A theory has logical problems as well, like having no well defined start, being an infinite regress.
January 11, 2019 at 14:24
Staring with the relativistic energy-momentum equation: KE = mc² ? ? (1 - v² ? c²) So m = KE × ? (1 - v² ? c²) / c² So time (in the v term) determines...
January 11, 2019 at 14:16
But a claim is made about the nature of God; that he is all powerful enough to prevent all evil. If God is good but not omnipotent, a universe that co...
January 11, 2019 at 13:46
You can say time is a human construct but it represents something that does/did exist in reality. There was ‘then’ and there is ‘now’ and there is a n...
January 11, 2019 at 13:07
How do we describe time then? The only models of a continua I've seen have used points or line segments to model it. In both cases its valid to discus...
January 11, 2019 at 11:55
What changes to make ‘now’ ‘then’? There is some measurable quantity we call time that changes. So it is reasonable to discuss the duration of 'now'. ...
January 10, 2019 at 18:02
Length of 'now' If we consider the length of ‘now’, it cannot be zero seconds because that gives a divide by zero error when we work out the number of...
January 10, 2019 at 11:23
? * 10 = ? ? / 4 = ? etc... So an axiom of infinity is effectively 'when you change it, it does not change'. What sort of reasonable system of the wor...
January 02, 2019 at 12:26
Meaningless ways. Bijection is meaningless. How can there be the same number of naturals as rationals? Each natural is clearly composed of a potential...
January 01, 2019 at 20:37
It clearly does give the wrong results. There are more numbers than squares in any finite interval. So we can induce this applies to all intervals. Bu...
January 01, 2019 at 20:30
You do not have much familiarity with basic logic. A number cannot be larger than any number and be a number at the same time. None of you will addres...
January 01, 2019 at 20:07