You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Pattern-chaser

Comments

I thought that Baden's post offered technical guidance. This doesn't make it wrong, of course, or unhelpful either. Your OP targeted writing, but also...
January 07, 2019 at 15:06
<like>
January 07, 2019 at 14:26
The technical aspects of writing are important, just like brush techniques are important for an artist. We need to learn these techniques before we ca...
January 07, 2019 at 13:31
I don't understand why people would ignore that humans have always done this, as far as we know. It's all very well to say "why do we do this?", and p...
January 07, 2019 at 13:24
Is there anything to add to this? If there is, I can't see it. Well said! :up:
January 07, 2019 at 13:18
IME, the best way for a Westerner to understand wu wei is to refer to any of Alan Watts' lectures on the subject. He explains it better than anyone I ...
January 07, 2019 at 13:14
:up:
January 06, 2019 at 18:31
Before we believed in Gods - if there was such a time? - we would not have thought of Gods, so we would have the "absence of thinking of" Gods that yo...
January 06, 2019 at 14:29
I can't quite see how we could have developed atheism before theism. How could we not-believe in God(s), when we had yet to recognise Gods in the firs...
January 06, 2019 at 14:11
Nothing "went wrong". We have had religion for a very long time. Atheism cannot have developed until there were Gods being worshipped, so that atheist...
January 06, 2019 at 14:07
No, it hasn't. But these days, internet access, even for the smallest pieces of equipment, is normal. And humans have a history of just doing it, rega...
January 02, 2019 at 14:34
:up:
December 31, 2018 at 13:16
No. From the OP: It's about a word, and whether that word applies to God. So does it? :chin:
December 30, 2018 at 16:52
It's worth remembering that this topic is not about God, but whether a particular word - "subjecthood" - might apply to God. We might as usefully ask ...
December 30, 2018 at 15:51
Indeed it could. But this we must avoid at all costs! :fear: Once an AI has the freedom to evolve and improve itself, there is no predicting what it m...
December 30, 2018 at 14:59
In: Brexit  — view comment
Because very few countries are as rich as we are? Only five countries in the whole world (which boasts hundreds of countries) have more than we do. An...
December 30, 2018 at 14:49
In: Brexit  — view comment
Then why mention a 'better deal'? There won't be one.
December 28, 2018 at 19:35
...which is what makes them real! They are not real in the same way that rocks and crocodiles are real. They're real like Harry Potter and mathematics...
December 28, 2018 at 14:24
In: Brexit  — view comment
Hasn't the EU already told us it's this deal or none? They are the biggest economic power bloc on the planet. Once we've left, we're just a third-worl...
December 28, 2018 at 14:10
Logically? Probably, yes. Outside of a strictly logical/scientific framework, it is coherent, just as the triple goddesses of history are. If you are ...
December 28, 2018 at 13:52
Bo**ocks! This is like me accusing fascists and capitalists of paedophilia, just because they're the people I most disagree with. Please confine yours...
December 24, 2018 at 16:05
None of those. We just treat people fairly. It's a simple enough concept; I don't think it benefits from a political brand, do you?
December 24, 2018 at 15:51
Just look at the description you offer: social justice. Fairness in the way people treat one another. And this offends you? I wonder why? "Political c...
December 24, 2018 at 15:44
And a self-evident-truth is ... a guess. For if we could manage anything more - ideally, proof - then we would. And when we can't, we guess. Self-evid...
December 24, 2018 at 15:38
Quite right. But mathematicians needed infinity, so they shoe-horned it into their arithmetic and algebra, even though it is obvious that it doesn't a...
December 24, 2018 at 15:36
...always remembering that it is mathematically invalid to divide both sides of the equation by infinity. You did remember that, right? :chin:
December 24, 2018 at 15:20
Interesting. So consider length, the human concept of length. It has no length, being a non-physical thing. But it exists. And remember that axioms ar...
December 24, 2018 at 15:17
Returning to the original sub-thread: Impossible to account for? Impossible to/for who? Humans, of course. The universe has no need for numbers, which...
December 24, 2018 at 15:07
No, it's not. But it represents 2, the number. If numbers don't exist, 2 does not exist, and the symbol ("2") has no meaning, for there is nothing for...
December 24, 2018 at 14:40
You didn't say "not real" you said not-existing: With no numbers, there can be no number theory. Your position is unjustifiable. Sorry.
December 24, 2018 at 14:18
They have indeed, but not enough to slow things down all that much, and it wasn't something we did, it just happened. God did it! :wink: Interesting. ...
December 23, 2018 at 14:20
...without actually knowing if anyone did experience what you did not! :wink: Ah, here's someone with actual experience. :smile:
December 23, 2018 at 13:41
:chin: :wink:
December 23, 2018 at 13:39
No, you weren't just let go, your mother supported you. So you have not had the experience you speculate upon. So who has? :chin:
December 20, 2018 at 19:14
But you introduced the topic by asserting that experience...?
December 20, 2018 at 19:12
Then it isn't your experience. Whose experience is it?
December 20, 2018 at 19:10
Where in the scientific space-time universe is "two"? Yes, you can find similar (is there any such thing as exactly identical?) things there, which we...
December 20, 2018 at 19:09
If numbers didn't exist at all, mathematics would be dead in the water, wouldn't it?
December 20, 2018 at 17:39
Yes, the misapplication of science, outside of its sphere of relevance, is, er, unwise. :up:
December 20, 2018 at 17:30
Yes, God can. Ask Her. :up: :wink:
December 20, 2018 at 17:09
Didn't you know that the mathematics of infinity is a kludge put there to force it into the arithmetic we use on finite numbers? :chin:
December 20, 2018 at 17:08
Yes.
December 20, 2018 at 17:05
Yes. How could it not be?
December 20, 2018 at 17:05
I think all this depends on your concept of time. What is time, to you? What do you want to do with it? Before you decide it's quantised, perhaps you ...
December 20, 2018 at 14:58
We should teach children that nothing can be (correctly) recognised by a human as "objective truth". History is as good a subject as any to introduce ...
December 20, 2018 at 14:54
OK, so which part have you recognised as being false?
December 20, 2018 at 14:50
Ignore philosophers. By this I mean it doesn't matter who thought of the idea, Schopenhauer, Kant, Hulme, Aristotle.... It's the idea that matters. Re...
December 20, 2018 at 14:48
In: Brexit  — view comment
:chin: And how long (after Brexit) must we wait before these negotiations start, never mind bear fruit? At least one country has told us to 'get in li...
December 20, 2018 at 14:43
Alice Coltrane - Huntingdon Ashram Monastery
December 20, 2018 at 14:37
That isn't mandatory. Is it your experience? Most people move gradually from childhood to adulthood, helped, guided and protected by their parents, sc...
December 20, 2018 at 14:36