You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Pattern-chaser

Comments

I think the choice of political systems is a little more than just two! :smile: A critical part of this choice is the balance between society/communit...
April 23, 2019 at 12:25
Sincere and honest with ourselves? Such people are as rare as rocking-horse sh*t! :wink: My own best attempt at honesty says I'm here to enjoy myself,...
April 23, 2019 at 11:42
The 1% work only for themselves, and maybe a little for those like them. They fix nothing. It's us that fix things, on their instructions. They have t...
April 23, 2019 at 11:29
Fair question. And the topic specifically addresses illegal drugs, but are you accounting for legal drugs? Alcohol is the obvious example. If your que...
April 21, 2019 at 10:44
You're offering logic and common sense? What are you thinking? :wink:
April 21, 2019 at 10:42
Off-topic, I admit, but: not many people here need help with knowledge and science. :chin:
April 21, 2019 at 10:39
? You were there, to record and measure it? That's what empirical evidence is, yes?
April 20, 2019 at 16:46
You're using it consistently with common everyday usage. In a discussion of scientific method, "verify" is the complement of "falsify".
April 20, 2019 at 16:25
To verify something, we confirm it is true, literally. We don't increase our faith in its correctness, we confirm its correctness. Which, in scientifi...
April 20, 2019 at 14:47
No, I don't think we are. What you describe as verification is actually failure-to-falsify. Verification is an infinite act, as I described. You need ...
April 20, 2019 at 14:28
There is only one threshold value for certainty: 100% or probability 1. Not 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% and not probab...
April 20, 2019 at 14:16
And from this, you are happy to assume that every effect has a cause? Reasonable, for sure, but not philosophically rigorous. You can't see another wa...
April 20, 2019 at 13:59
Think about it for a moment. To falsify a theory, you only have to show it doesn't work in one set of experimental circumstances. Easy. But to verify ...
April 20, 2019 at 10:34
What is your justification for this?
April 20, 2019 at 10:24
And that's how we should 'do' philosophy? With logic, and nothing else?
April 19, 2019 at 16:15
Demonstrate how anything can exist with a (first) cause! The thing is we don't understand this stuff. We're trading theories, none of which can be sub...
April 19, 2019 at 16:13
:up: An idea is dependent for its existence on the minds which contain it.
April 19, 2019 at 16:11
And I went from forcibly religious - I was raised Roman Catholic - until I was able to choose for myself. Thereafter I was (unthinkingly) atheist, the...
April 19, 2019 at 16:07
There, I fixed it for you. Science and the scientific method do not deal with verification, only falsification. Some people see that as one of its dra...
April 19, 2019 at 15:54
I'm saying that I'm a believer (but not a Christian ;)). And before that, I was claiming not to deny or believe-against the evidence. OK? :smile: A gu...
April 19, 2019 at 14:12
To all of those questions, no. And yet feminism focusses on the position into which women have been forced by men. Masculinism (if I may call it that)...
April 19, 2019 at 11:55
No, I'm not black. I'm very conventional: elderly white cis male, retired techie, from England.
April 19, 2019 at 11:48
Hmm. And yet *I* am that foolish.... :wink:
April 19, 2019 at 11:46
Thanks. :up: And are you suggesting that this book tells us how to 'do' philosophy, or have I got the wrong end of the stick?
April 19, 2019 at 11:44
That Feynman quote is my constant guide, here, in philosophy, and elsewhere too. A closed mind is a dead mind, I suspect. :wink:
April 16, 2019 at 15:44
IMO, all of us philosophers (and all of us scientists too) should repeat this to ourselves at least once a day. :up: :smile: #ThoughtForTheDay
April 16, 2019 at 09:20
That's not how I read the QM explanation of the Big Bang. But maybe I misunderstood. That's complicated stuff. But how did the anti-matter mostly disa...
April 15, 2019 at 15:32
Quantum foam? :chin:
April 15, 2019 at 15:10
Assertion is not proof.
April 15, 2019 at 14:52
I have been trying to be more constructive than this, to illustrate my point, but now I am reduced to: Prove it!
April 15, 2019 at 14:47
I'm afraid that will only make him worse. In the end, we have only this: Don't feed the trolls!
April 15, 2019 at 14:41
Worse: there is no "American English", only the American language. English is the language spoken by the English, who live in England.
April 15, 2019 at 14:40
Nicely put. :up: :smile:
April 15, 2019 at 14:35
...while I don't think that my understanding of time is sufficient to justify a cause for it. Or not.
April 15, 2019 at 14:33
Yes, just as I believe something that I also know. But that's just my opinion. :smile:
April 15, 2019 at 14:26
And yet you refer to a "first cause"? :chin:
April 15, 2019 at 14:14
Only if cause and effect applies in this scenario. You're speculating, then cherry-picking the bits of logically-derived stuff (and maybe some illogic...
April 15, 2019 at 13:54
Agreed, but saying so does not make it logical. You begin your speculations with an assumption. Very fitting. :wink:
April 15, 2019 at 13:31
Me too. :up: My concept of (say) justice is non-material, but it exists. It doesn't exist physically, of course, but you didn't mean that, did you?
April 15, 2019 at 13:27
Your suggestion of God (and Her existence) is not logically derived from anything.
April 15, 2019 at 13:24
Unwilling? Or unable? Here is a recent interchange I had on Twitter: Tweeter 1: The Tories said privatisation of the railways would give us "better, m...
April 15, 2019 at 13:09
Although you have not - probably wisely - defined what God is, I see no reason to assume She is bound by the same constraints that apply to us humans....
April 15, 2019 at 13:02
No, you don't. I'm not sure I do either. But the scenario you present is speculative in its every aspect, to the point where it seems difficult to mak...
April 15, 2019 at 12:06
Can you "discover" something that is non-physical? Mathematics is not part of the scientific space-time universe, except trivially. How could you "dis...
April 14, 2019 at 13:55
Here's a link to an article I just found on Aeon magazine, entitled "Philosophical writing should read like a letter". It seemed relevant to this disc...
April 14, 2019 at 13:49
No more than I am happy that the ground I'm standing on is made of stone. Neither is in my control; I simply accept them, as I must. What other option...
April 13, 2019 at 14:59
I don't think that's clear, one way or the other. I think it's obscured by prisons, and the politics that drives their use. America - and many of the ...
April 13, 2019 at 14:54
I think capitalism, especially in its American flavour, along with continuous-growth economics, has lead to our destruction of the world. Greed prevai...
April 13, 2019 at 14:40
And I wonder if theorising, in this sense, is the same as art? I.e. if the artist says it's art, then it is. Our bit is to judge it (for ourselves!) t...
April 13, 2019 at 14:28
I think bodily death is irreversible and unavoidable. I like to think it's possible for some (non-physical) part of me/us to continue afterward, but t...
April 13, 2019 at 14:24