Belter

Heidegger made in my view metaphysics. He suggested that only Germanic people are humans due to they construct their existential project (consisting f...

Thank for the comments. In my view, it is "semantic" matter, or linguistic one in general. Kant would not be agree that philosophy is contradictions f...

Obviously, the "crossing out" rule only works for certain premises and notations. My claim is that there are other "rules" with the same consequence f...

The point is that the crossing out is other logic than "classic" modus ponens, but it is a formal way that leds to a valid conclusion (necessarily tru...

In my view, Kant's examples of synthetic a priori are not theorems, as I said wrongly in the first commentary. The synthetic a priori fits for example...

The Goldbach conjecture, for example, is true a priori, and synthetic. If someone proves it, the conjecture will become into a theorem, and so it will...

When a the truth-value of a premise is relative to other premises, it is not called "premise" but "conclusion".

The assertion (1) "There are no a priori synthetic truths" can be tested by showing a example of a priori and synthetic truth, as Kant showed. Mathema...

Logic is an instrument of justification. The logical systems have or not consistency, completeness, etc. They are some of properties of some logical s...

Metaphysics assertions led to contradictions, as Kant showed. We can prove that the world is created and not-created, and so. The metaphysics is not a...

I am agree. My view is that Goodness and Simulation arguments are very close, so by definition God would be able to occult us.

I want to say that mental states fit brain functions, and mental states also have functions (to predict movement, differentiate objects, etc.), but th...

Since I do not endorse that mental states have not a function, but they are a function, of brain states, this argument about the identity does not wor...

I try to show that your 1) premise is not true, so your argument is lack (or it is a vacuous tautology).

I think, as I posted at beginning, that there are 1) individuals (sociological level), which 2) use its brain (biological level) 3) to think (psycholo...

I think that mental states are not defined by their functional roles, but brain states. That is, in 1) you must change "mental" for "brain". Then 1) a...

And they can also mean the same, such as the context of my previous answer. I am explained my view in previous post, so I will not repeat it. Basicall...

I do not understand what do you mean by "system of abstract facts itself".

Sorry for my expression, I try to be the clearest as I can. My claim is that Singularity is by definition unknown, such as God in religions, the playe...

I am an instrumentalist, functionalist, pragmatist, etc.: brain is the evolutionary solution to the advantage that think has. Individual is which thin...

Sorry, I am editing the post.

I think it is a very interesting question. Consciousness can be the "vividness" (number of pixels), but also the "integrity" (i.e., not superposition ...

Computer is a mathematical concept. Alan Turing defined it (the Turing machine) and also its limits (the halting problem). Human is the biological spe...

It is another abstract example. I do not understand what want you say with this. In my view, a rational skepticism would question the validity of the ...

You said that rejecting IQ tests shows low IQ, and to question its validity shows high IQ. Because you are questioning them, but you do not cite anyon...

Scientific theories are supported by empirical data. You have not data (I suppose) of your claim. It is possible, but again you do not show any eviden...

Your theory about IQ (predictable by people's belief about IQ tests) is not plausible. I said that dismissed IQ tests shows low IQ ironically. IQ is p...

If you think that IQ tests are bad designed, so they are not scientifically valid, you should show some kind of evidence. If your argument is that emp...

Social, linguistic and musical features of intelligence are also measured in the IQ test. People only show the limitations of empirical science for ps...

In my opinion, this rules for all psychological (and scientific in general) concepts. Only logical and math concepts are "universally well defined".

You can be sure. I work in a very related domain. People often do not know what is an IQ test.

This the wrong point. Why IQ tests are different to other psychological ones? The questioning of IQ validity is an evidence of low IQ.

Consciousness could be the temporal synchronization of several different and specialized brain areas (brain channels or "senses"). When this happen, t...

In previous responses I said that you can see objective and subjective red objects. You seem to want misunderstanding me. Anyway, even when you imagin...

Red is how individuals see certain objects when they are lighted. This is a psychological fact. You are which must prove that the scientific view of c...

I summarize as I understand the relations between brain, mind a conscience. We start with brain, which is an object of nature (the phenomena to explai...

Another way of accounting conscience is the following: conscience is the vividness or "resolution" of mental states. It would be a property of mental ...

The property of redness is said to all that we call "red", both if it is real or fictional light. I follow the semantic rule of predicating a property...

So, you can say "What is that I am viewing?" "A red tomato"; "How are you viewed it?" "Very vividly". "With that are you viewing it?" "With my visual ...

There are several problems with Hard Problem. Another more is that we do not experience the Red as red (the Redness) but something as red. An object (...

I will try another way. How do you know that 1) "Red is a Conscious experience that exists in the Conscious Mind" is true; but 2) "a Conscious experie...

I'm agree. Basically, free will could be viewed in an operative sense as the ability of 1) wanting to do something and 2) multiple possibilities. 1) r...

It is relevant in my view to emphasize the difference between individual and specie in the TOE. Sometimes, there are genetic mutations in individuals,...

I think that you are in a kind of conceptual vortex. "Red" is a color...

You continue assuming that brain and mind are like two effects, that can "correlate" such as the increasing of educative and economical level. If you ...

"Logic" are these systems and by definition no other thing. "Reality" has not a logical structure but physical. You seem to be a rationalist like Hege...

I think that a constructive analysis of Hard Problem could be the following. It is not possible to differentiate a priori, for a given subject, if he ...

You are which is seeing the PC, but not the opposite. It seem to me very trivial. That is, camera in the example is like human glasses: you extend, in...

I think that the book permit us to know a lot of not evident features of mind. The synchronicity in groups, circuits, etc., of specialized neurons whe...

How it is possible to prove logical properties in something that is not a logic (a formal language constructed by humans)? I view it as a complete non...