Belter

The explanatory gap is jumped everyday by psychological researchers. I recommended you for example, "I of the vortex" if you want to know this "myster...

I am agree in general. It is possible that qualias of another persons but also the our self are differentiated by actions, like when you say that you'...

It is in my view, the question is bad formulated. It is a scientific question the "how" the knife cuts the onion: it simply "cuts" it, separating it i...

I do not agree it. Mind world is part of the physical world, referred to certain abilities of individuals, and realized by brains. I am not a dualist,...

If you program the robot for view colors, why do you think that it has not a "qualia" such as of humans for which evolution programmed them for that? ...

They have qualia (except robots if they have not a "brain", even when it is not "cellular") due to the same (evolutionary) reasons that us: to perceiv...

The redness is a property of the some objects, which has the property of being view as red (at least for humans), so redness perception is which "exis...

Reality has a "real" structure (for example, elementary waves-particles and forces) like logic has a "logical" one. You are mixing the structure of th...

Fish, lizards and robots all use some kind of "brain", in the sense of a material system for thinking. Mind happens without some form of brain is for ...

The hard problem introduce a new additional problem that in my view does not exist. When Red-Neurons are firing in X, the conscious experience of Red ...

I'm agree in part. But "mind" does not "create" the brain. A "model" and the phenomena modeled are two thing completely different.

My lemma is this matter is: "Individuals think through the brain" "Mind" is which we postulate to explain individual performance, for example: - Why J...

I think that all knowledge can be: 1) Necessary a priori (axioms, A ->B = not-A v B, etc.): they do not require any more logical or empirical evidence...

To sum, the knowledge can be divided at least into these four dimensions: Temporal: "A priori/posteriori" (before/after) Structural: "Analytic/synthet...

In my view (which can becomes different through the discussions insofar I clear my ideas), there are several interesting ways of define the "analytic/...

It is not semantic in my opinion. Smoking causes cancer, but the mechanism of the cancer is other thing than to smoke.

Yes. But he also said that it is an identity sentence, and "synthetic a posteriori". My view is that "Hesperus is Phosphorus" is not a true "identity"...

In my opinion, they are concepts that explain what happens with individuals. Mind is that we postulated for modelating how individuals make which they...

In my view, the brain is not the cause of mind in the same way temperature is not an effect of the molecular movement but it physical mechanism (how h...

I think that the use of "phenomena" in the question entails its physical -despite incomplete- modeling. That is, we can experience the phenomena becau...

Thank for your analysis. My claim is just that. The "Hesperus is Phosphorus" sentences are only apparent "identities", but actually they are identific...

Thank you for your exposition of my argument. However, I think that (1a') and (1b') have not equivalent to the a=a identities of Frege. They are with ...

Thanks My interest is not to elude the philosophical problems but try to understand them. But in this matter I sincerely cannot see it. In my view, it...

In my opinion, brain is the biological mechanism (neuronal system) that permits individuals to have a mind. The relationship between them looks like i...

I think that 1) is not the cause of 2) but its biological mechanism. Causes of Red experience are related with seeing a red objetc, to be alucinating ...

The method of substitution salva veritae is valid, for example, in mathematical equations (x-5= y+2; y=3-x; => x=3-x +2+5 => x=5). In natural language...

The natural languages equalities with the name-object form are symmetrical preserving the linguistic function (saying/showing). For example, "'Venus' ...

My problem with Frege is his that he account natural languages equalities by reducting them to formal ones, so the problem of saying/showing emerges w...

It is a valid argument on the assumption that 'Venus' in the first equality has the same linguistic function than in the second one. We can think the ...

This is a mistake but I think that it does not invalidates my argument. The same analysis can be made: (1) Hesperus is Phosporus A) (name-name) Hesper...

In my view, 'synthetic' means 'empirical' as opposite to 'formal' (content level) and 'a priori' means 'predictive' (formal level) as I said. Hence, '...

In my opinion, "without empirical evidence" only can be understood as referred to certain formal knowledge (logic and mathematics, when the true can b...

I think that "prior to experience" means "predictive" insofar it introduces an temporal dimension in the truth. In mi opinion, your example of the deg...

Thank for your response @"gurugeorge" I think that the "a priori" moves from language to reality, about stating the possibility of a fact; and the "a ...

They are (informal) definitions, so their true is established a priori. I want to say that a "unnecessary" conclusion can be "invalid" in two ways ("p...

I resume my idea with other words: "A" is necessarily true iff "not-A -> (B and not-B)" "A" is possible true iff "A or not-A" is true "A" is empirical...

I think that a non-physical thing is that has not physical properties, so physics is not able to account it. For example, mathematical and logic syste...