You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Rank Amateur

Comments

In: On God  — view comment
i am willing to argue against any set of premises that end with the conclusion " therefore theism is unreasonable" believing something is true, does n...
October 31, 2018 at 16:01
sorry - i have no clue at all what point you are making here.
October 31, 2018 at 15:29
In: On God  — view comment
much of this entire issue is based on one's definitions of the words. I would define faith as an individual basis used to believe something is true, a...
October 31, 2018 at 15:12
In: On God  — view comment
every argument against a faith based belief that is not in conflict with fact or reason - is just another faith based belief.
October 31, 2018 at 15:01
In: On God  — view comment
that it is in no way in conflict with fact or reason -
October 31, 2018 at 13:43
Exactly, that is the point. With the only addition is that the 2 year old has no idea at all that he knows nothing about calculus. And our understandi...
October 30, 2018 at 22:57
In: On God  — view comment
as I stated, I don't think any truth one believes is better or worse if believed by fact, reason, or faith. As long as, as I stated, that what one bel...
October 30, 2018 at 22:38
yea - you are missing my point - no worries
October 30, 2018 at 20:54
think my analogy is exactly the point i am trying to make - what is your basis for thinking our ability to actually comprehend the true nature of God ...
October 30, 2018 at 20:53
and ants can communicate their understanding of their world to each other. And their perceptions of their world can be perfectly reasonable to their f...
October 30, 2018 at 20:46
and a 2 year old sitting on my lap can make statements about the calculus book on my desk. The point is we can say all we want, and we can believe all...
October 30, 2018 at 20:42
here is skepical theist response. P1 - we have no basis at all to believe we can make any statement at all about the nature of God. P2. - any statemen...
October 30, 2018 at 20:14
In: On God  — view comment
In general I agree. I think any statement we make about the nature of God has no basis. There is no reason to believe that we in anyway possess the to...
October 30, 2018 at 19:59
I see no philosophic difference at all between faith based theism and faith based belief in a multi-universe. Neither is in any way at all a matter of...
October 30, 2018 at 19:41
Not quite ready to believe that. Nation states have various degrees of morality, and different levels of concern about individuals. If that makes me a...
October 30, 2018 at 01:16
Can I speculate all human beings have a right not to be enslaved ?? How without circular logic would one go about proving that ? Or one has a right no...
October 29, 2018 at 19:50
I do think as human beings we have certain inalienable rights - simply due to our humanness. One of those rights would be to improve the condition of ...
October 29, 2018 at 19:32
Not sure exactly - I think there are 3 ways one can believe something is true, and act accordingly. Fact, reason and faith. In general the realm of fa...
October 29, 2018 at 18:58
Personally - I have no real position on the reasonableness of the 3O's one way or the other. As a skeptical theist - i don't believe we have any abili...
October 29, 2018 at 18:25
from Wikipedia - use with caution - My take is this is just applying Modal logic to Anselm's base argument. Instead of saying what we can imagine, it ...
October 29, 2018 at 18:04
I also think he does acknowledged in his argument that the God of 3 O's is outside reason - from memory could well be mistaken
October 29, 2018 at 17:13
So as the caravan of 4,000 give or take make their way toward the US, while we are planning to send 8 or 9 thousand troops to the boarder to prevent t...
October 29, 2018 at 16:10
Theists don't normally - or classically use the 3 O's in their proofs of God. These are beliefs theists hold by faith, and are outside reason. For exa...
October 29, 2018 at 15:07
and while the ant may have an ant definition of astrophysics, it may have nothing at all to do with astrophysics. However the ants can still enjoy arg...
October 28, 2018 at 22:49
or perhaps we have no capacity to understand what God is at all. And all of our anthropomorphic rationalizations and theories are akin to an ant tryin...
October 28, 2018 at 21:43
pascal's first proposition is objectively true, and is independent of assigning any probability, it is, either God is, or God is not, and we can't kno...
October 28, 2018 at 10:13
trump has been a master of manufacturing a crisis, creating fear, and assigning blame for it, and unifying some mass of people against this made up en...
October 27, 2018 at 12:52
not 100% sure what you mean by "religion" in this - but interpreting it broadly - I think most "religions" would say they have already found the Creat...
October 25, 2018 at 18:43
I always thought the most powerful thing about Pascal's wager was as an argument against agnosticism. His proposition that we are already embarked on ...
October 24, 2018 at 19:14
I have no issue at all with anyone's choice to " let go " - Would just enjoy the same courtesy to those of us who hold on to something instead.
October 22, 2018 at 20:33
I think the only thing science would claim due to a lack of evidence, is there is a lack of evidence. Quite literally just about everything you would ...
October 22, 2018 at 20:13
So take it easy on me - my physics knowledge is limited, my astro physics is non - existent. If I understand you correctly - you would call the big ba...
October 22, 2018 at 20:06
I am a theist - and sent the link where it came from -
October 22, 2018 at 18:11
sorry - hit the button before adding - http://www.hawking.org.uk/the-beginning-of-time.html In this lecture, I would like to discuss whether time itse...
October 22, 2018 at 18:05
this from Hawkings the beginning of time, have we moved past this ?
October 22, 2018 at 18:03
that may or may be true, but you would be leaving science's best understanding of the origin of the universe. I may be behind the times, but i believe...
October 22, 2018 at 17:19
Blessed are the peacemakers - thanks - think TWI and myself are all good
October 22, 2018 at 12:45
No problem - thanks the reply
October 22, 2018 at 11:21
sometimes I wonder about folks, I just specifically told you, that I was making that comment about my post, not yours. I understand you thought I was ...
October 22, 2018 at 10:14
was saying my post was theology not philosophy.
October 22, 2018 at 09:40
again not philosophy, but theology. The concept of the "hidden God" is to have one's belief based on faith, which they would argue adds greater meanin...
October 22, 2018 at 01:11
enjoy the rest of your evening. Again, if you would care to make a supported argument that my theism is irrational, would be happy to engage.
October 21, 2018 at 00:28
opinions are not very interesting, I prefer arguments based on propositions
October 21, 2018 at 00:21
thank you for sharing another opinion.
October 21, 2018 at 00:13
thank you for your opinion.
October 21, 2018 at 00:08
not a proponent of full contact philosophy. Not an evangelist. Have no desire to prove anything. One can by faith alone choose to believe what one wan...
October 20, 2018 at 23:50
think this in someway is what mr ossipoff is saying “Perhaps even atheism versus theism is an example of this principle that an apparent either/or can...
October 20, 2018 at 22:05
Not sure truth is the right concept. One can believe something is true and act accordingly thorough either fact, reason or faith. No one can state as ...
October 19, 2018 at 14:06
A Catholic theologian would say the purpose of genesis is to speak to God as creator, and in that purpose it in inerrant. The purpose was not a scient...
October 19, 2018 at 09:47
Can't speak for all, but a Catholic theologian would say the Bible is inerrant in its purpose which is the salvation of souls. The purpose is not to b...
October 19, 2018 at 02:13