You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Rank Amateur

Comments

every time you acknowledge the possibility of the counter position
January 21, 2019 at 00:00
If you say, God is. That is a faith based position, if you say God is not, that is a faith based position, If you say maybe either way, it is not a fa...
January 20, 2019 at 20:57
yea exactly, a point is just a location in at least a 2 demensional space. A point has no size. A line has size in one dimension l, in a at least two ...
January 20, 2019 at 20:28
Close enough- good with that.
January 20, 2019 at 19:18
No, sorry each and every point is, by definition, a point in space described by a x and y coordinate. All the points on the x axis, have x= to somethi...
January 20, 2019 at 19:17
So, would it be fair to say then, that you believe there is some chance, there is such a thing as God?
January 20, 2019 at 18:03
only issue I have with that is, is just probable enough to eliminate it being faith. In that sky diving example, if the probability of the chute openi...
January 20, 2019 at 17:51
Small point, pun not intended, points only exist in 2 dimensions. The only thing we can now say exists in one dimension is time. I have no issue with ...
January 20, 2019 at 17:27
also good physicists don't let math get in the way. As you probably know for quantum mechanics to work in all instances, there must exist some x, wher...
January 20, 2019 at 17:23
it would have been more economic and of equal value to just say I disagree, because I disagree.
January 20, 2019 at 17:17
I don't disagree- But can you really have a contextual understanding of 1 dimension? I don't. Space does not exist in one dimension. Now put the entir...
January 20, 2019 at 16:57
science is completely based on reason. That is not what my comment means. At this moment in time it is not a matter of scientific knowledge how or eve...
January 20, 2019 at 16:49
isn't the prospect of a singularly nearly as unbelievable as a necessary being? What exactly is a one dimensional "place?", that contains near infinit...
January 20, 2019 at 16:23
Agree - however that is not where it is left. Where this usually ends is, "your un created creator is wrong, because science is right, and science say...
January 20, 2019 at 16:03
I will avoid the social arguments concerning abortion on this forum, because I do not consider them philosophical. But the philosophical question is, ...
January 20, 2019 at 01:43
The first few premises are establishing murder, defined as taking away a future of value for human beings like us is immoral - he wants to establish i...
January 20, 2019 at 01:39
and on some relatively big stuff. Crazy world we live in.
January 19, 2019 at 23:46
no we kind of actually have, pretty sure we can say quantum entanglement is real.
January 19, 2019 at 23:38
Personhood is a quagmire. It is completely arbitrary, pick the criteria that you like, draw the arbitrary line and anything on one side is and anythin...
January 19, 2019 at 23:23
Relativity works, where it works and doesn't work, where it doesn't work. About a million years ago in a some physics class I was told to just to the ...
January 19, 2019 at 23:12
if you really want to blow your mind, if quantum mechanics and supports block time, Then science is only predictable and useful when linked to a speci...
January 19, 2019 at 22:01
Thanks, never hear of the Big Bang before. Please. The point is, there is no philosophical difference for you pointing to a singularity and others poi...
January 19, 2019 at 21:57
I feel we are now in violent agreement on this. Just passing each other in communication. Pretty sure I agree completely with you.
January 19, 2019 at 21:50
Like you, me human beings. Do you not value your future Tim, are you looking forward to dinner tonight? Looking forward to the next good movie you wil...
January 19, 2019 at 21:45
Point taken, thought it sounded cool. Here is the issue behind the question. I put forward an idea for a workable definition of truth as, a belief one...
January 19, 2019 at 21:19
Is such a thing as a singularity a scientific fact? Does it rise to the level of scientific theory, which I assume you know has a specific meaning, th...
January 19, 2019 at 21:07
Let me try and make the argument for a valuable future- there is a link above to the whole argument 1. It is immoral, without justification, to kill p...
January 19, 2019 at 20:36
January 19, 2019 at 20:20
sorry
January 19, 2019 at 20:18
there have been pages and pages of objections, mostly just statements absent support. To barrow a phrase, me parsing them all together would be like n...
January 19, 2019 at 19:35
At the gym. B back u
January 19, 2019 at 18:33
I have no problem, you have agreed with all the premises and the conclusion If you have an issue with the difference between a position based on reaso...
January 19, 2019 at 18:22
happy to, make an argument please that theism is unreasonable.
January 19, 2019 at 17:47
You are missing what the assumption is. It is not an assumption about the nature of the fetus itself. Just that the whether or not abortion is morally...
January 19, 2019 at 17:45
the first one I grabbed in the search. Said by don marquis in the title. Mea culpa- I am familiar with the argument was just looking for a link to sha...
January 19, 2019 at 17:38
Conclusion: Therefore theism as defined, is not in direct conflict with scientific fact. Theism, as defined is not in direct conflict with reason, sin...
January 19, 2019 at 17:34
are you familiar with prof marquis argument? I can summarize it quickly if you are not.
January 19, 2019 at 17:08
is this better https://rintintin.colorado.edu/~vancecd/phil215/Marquis.pdf
January 19, 2019 at 17:06
would you like to accept as true the rest of the propositions and get right to the conclusion?
January 19, 2019 at 16:56
agree in total, the history of the scientific method is a long line error assumed correct until superseded, This also may be its highest praise that w...
January 19, 2019 at 16:54
p4. The arguments in P3 have counter arguments based on reason Agree
January 19, 2019 at 16:46
read it all, we are on the same team. He is just outlining the case he will argue against.
January 19, 2019 at 15:38
thank you assume now P1 and p 2 are agreed p3. There are arguments – based on reason – that God does not exist Agree?
January 19, 2019 at 15:36
epic, small aside Are you familiar with Don Marquis argument on future of value? Below if not. http://web.csulb.edu/~cwallis/382/readings/160/marquis....
January 19, 2019 at 13:49
January 19, 2019 at 13:40
Because if it was a scientific fact, it would then defeat my conclusion, if it was scientific fact that God is not, my theism is unreasonable. But now...
January 19, 2019 at 13:35
How do I know it is true you have a headache? how do you make your truth, my truth?
January 19, 2019 at 13:27
Don't remember your other specific objections. Happy to address them if you wish to restate and continue An error's an error. A good argument should c...
January 19, 2019 at 13:20
Changes nothing of substance in the argument, I am a pragmatist. Has exactly the same meaning at the former P2 and P3 combined.
January 19, 2019 at 12:58
ok, omit P2 and P3, and add a new P2: the existence of God, (as defined in P1) is not a matter of scientific fact. Now you can go look for another sem...
January 19, 2019 at 12:39