You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Eros1982

Comments

With regard to your last reply, I am wondering if I can apply Double Negation to Ay-(a?y & (Fa & Fy))... viz: 1) Ay-(a?y & (Fa & Fy)) (your suggestion...
May 06, 2018 at 00:48
Ok. You have been very clear with the last two replies. Let us hope I can remember all those shift quantifiers --if in the test I'll have to deal with...
May 06, 2018 at 00:20
I will reread your last reply tomorrow (when I will switch provability with demonstrating invalidity :) There is one more question I'd like to ask, an...
May 05, 2018 at 18:35
Thank so much for you for your time. I will reread your replies in the weekend when I am off, with the hope that my mind will be sharper lol :) This s...
May 03, 2018 at 17:22
In ten days I have to take the exam and I still do not feel ready with everything.... Here is a conclusion that I am supposed to invalidate without an...
April 28, 2018 at 17:38
Regarding your solution... Do you mean identity elimination with IE on line 3? If yes, does IE allow us move b from the right of the first line to the...
April 15, 2018 at 14:58
It helps a lot, although I have to familiarize with proving conditionals --and reread your previous replies. From what you say, I have a to find a way...
April 15, 2018 at 14:12
It seems I am not well acquainted with discharging assumptions, and that's the real issue here. I thought that I had discharged assumption of line 3 o...
April 14, 2018 at 19:26
Ok I resolved the last exercise by myself, it turned to be easy. Now there is one more conclusion. This is what I should prove (through using =E or =I...
April 14, 2018 at 00:14
Professor said that I can avoid the dependency numbers (on the left) in my exam :) This is good news, because when you have many assumptions in a proo...
April 13, 2018 at 12:55
When I read his religious views, I came up with the impression that there cannot be a proof about the existence or non-existence of God because the un...
April 12, 2018 at 00:58
Ok, thank you so much for your time. You have been helpful, although I will reread your reply since the numbers on the left really confuse me. I will ...
April 12, 2018 at 00:33
As I said, all help is appreciated for a beginner like me... and details are really important. Below I bring the second proof that gave me some hard t...
April 11, 2018 at 01:52
Trying my best in my forties to pass a damn logic exam... And yes, in forums many important people disguise themselves with nicknames :)
April 11, 2018 at 00:53
jkg20 Insofar as everything depends on the details, I think you have been helpful already. My weakest point are assumptions (and I am confused with ma...
April 11, 2018 at 00:43
Nagase forgot this discussion :worry: Anyone else willing to help? Thanks!
April 10, 2018 at 19:13
Ok here is the solution I "found", without any sequent introductions... There seem to be many assumptions and I hope I have discharged them all. 1) (A...
April 07, 2018 at 23:30
Ok, I appreciate your help. This is the example I am trying to resolve (from G. Forbes' book, p. 268, no answer is given though the author says there ...
April 07, 2018 at 21:39