You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Corvus

Comments

See? You are avoiding / hiding away from the issue. It was the 1st message you posted gave the impression, and then it snowballed into what sounded li...
November 24, 2023 at 18:59
What is that got to do with the reason that you believe in the existence of the world? Could you elaborate please?
November 24, 2023 at 18:47
OK, to me this is not a big deal. We are only communicating with language, and language cannot reveal everything in the situation. I saw your out of t...
November 24, 2023 at 18:35
I don't claim to understand Austin. Austin is still in my reading list. I feel your writing style is not clear, and definitely not proper. Please bear...
November 24, 2023 at 18:29
This initial post of yours gave me no idea what you were trying to say. How does this relates to the OP?
November 24, 2023 at 18:21
No one would agree with you, if you insist that you were interested in this topic and tried to ask or bring your arguments for the thread going on, wh...
November 24, 2023 at 17:44
If you have anything constructive to add to the topic, I would advise you to read at least on Hume or Kant, and bring your own arguments on the points...
November 24, 2023 at 17:35
Not sure if this poster has read even single book on Philosophy in his whole life. Sounds like just making random statements on nothing.
November 24, 2023 at 17:20
I agree. We are trying to see the arguments either to prove, disprove or the question is illogical itself. The conclusions will only be evident from g...
November 24, 2023 at 17:08
Good point and interesting analysis. Any relevant quotes from Hume?
November 24, 2023 at 17:01
Sounds like another case of projection defence mechanism. :smirk:
November 24, 2023 at 16:59
Obviously, but not necessarily. Bear in mind that some of the greatest scientific discoveries were from random, accidental and leisurely observations ...
November 24, 2023 at 11:49
I am not so sure if having experience is strong evidence for the existence of a world or the world. Because experience is an abscure concept, which is...
November 24, 2023 at 11:19
Suppose Camus and Sartre wrote great novels for expressing their philosophical ideas in them.
November 23, 2023 at 20:07
That sounds poetic metaphor.
November 23, 2023 at 20:01
OK, there is no reason to believe in the existence of the world. Fair enough. I missed your answer No because it was in the small letters. Hume makes ...
November 23, 2023 at 19:45
Could you please point out which part of the world scenario doesn't exist? :) It means sensory perceptions which are logically verified with reasonabl...
November 23, 2023 at 17:25
Being simply conscious is not observation. All Science will degrade into superstition without observation. Observation is the key method in any Scienc...
November 23, 2023 at 15:06
Would it enable us to extend our scope of the visual perception of the world? I was trying to figure out how much of the contents of the earth I was p...
November 23, 2023 at 14:35
Yeah I see your point. I don't deny the world existing in common life as Hume put it. But when I think about it further and deeper, the world becomes ...
November 23, 2023 at 10:21
When you said, your perception is based on observation, it sounded more intense and purposeful perceptual activity than simply saying "seeing" "visual...
November 23, 2023 at 09:57
1. For experiencing something, you don't need the world. But you need a world. There are many worlds that you can experience, but a world you experien...
November 23, 2023 at 00:55
Could it be the case there is something rather than nothing, because you perceived something rather than nothing?
November 23, 2023 at 00:51
I agree with you. :up: It would be pure boring for sure, if everyone had same views on everything. :wink:
November 22, 2023 at 21:11
No no, I am not bothered at all. I was just a bit surprised at his post using the derogatory word (well here, it is definitely derogatory and ill mann...
November 22, 2023 at 20:53
Yeah, this sounds interesting. I will do some reading and search on Heinlein's Fair Witness (never heard of the name before), and have some contemplat...
November 22, 2023 at 20:50
I was talking about the OP in general how it went so far, because you said .
November 22, 2023 at 20:42
Maybe it is used different ways where you live, but here where I live, if one describes someone as ailing, then it is seriously rude. :roll:
November 22, 2023 at 20:39
No no, that wasn't about you. I think you are very sensitive. We have exchanged our views and there were some differences and mutual misunderstandings...
November 22, 2023 at 20:29
:cool: :ok:
November 22, 2023 at 20:18
I thought his using the word "ailing" in his reply was not a good manner in public writing.
November 22, 2023 at 20:16
Ok. I see. Good argument on your original post, I think. :up:
November 22, 2023 at 20:14
No insult. I don't see why you should feel insulted. I was only trying to make you to see the point, because you seem to be missing the point, from th...
November 22, 2023 at 20:12
If I admit what you want me to admit, would it make you happy? :rofl:
November 22, 2023 at 20:07
Do you suggest that the external world is an inborn (a priori) concept?
November 22, 2023 at 20:02
:cool: :ok: There are more well tuned posters who are giving excellent write-ups, and they alone compensate for any and all the confusions, and makes ...
November 22, 2023 at 19:49
I have been repeating myself about 1000 times so far this topic is asking for logical ground / reasons for believing in the existence of the world. No...
November 22, 2023 at 19:46
Sure. My definition of realist in this thread was the folks who believe in the objects which they can see only as real existence, since this is a meta...
November 22, 2023 at 19:31
Suppose there are different types of realists of course. Are there also idealists, sceptics, immaterialist, anti-realists and non-realists who are rea...
November 22, 2023 at 19:02
Obviously you have not seen them getting asked, and giving out their replies. That doesn't follow that they don't make claims on these issues. Other p...
November 22, 2023 at 18:35
Isn't experience always about something? I used to think that way, but maybe you have idea on experience in general, or experience which is not about ...
November 22, 2023 at 18:32
Ok fair enough. Quite disappointed on your "vulgar" nature of response in hysterical tone. Enjoy your own recommended readings yourself.
November 22, 2023 at 18:16
Solipsism sounds controversial, but then the alternatives don't sound much better, do they? If you look closely, realism is also a type of scepticsm, ...
November 22, 2023 at 17:48
Treatise of Human Nature Part IV. p.188 - p.218 Hume denies reason's ability to warrant us with belief in continued existence of the world when not pe...
November 22, 2023 at 17:15
How did you manage to perceive the unperceived cup first place, which caused your belief and memory on the unperceived cup? Most of our beliefs can be...
November 22, 2023 at 17:07
I suppose there are many alternative worlds existing out there to believe in too. I asked ChatGPT for type of the alternative worlds available for us....
November 22, 2023 at 17:01
Does that mean that when observation is not operational, do you stop believing in the existence of the world during the time of no observation? If you...
November 22, 2023 at 16:55
I think you are missing the point of the question. It was not about "someone need proof on his belief", but it was about asking "whether 180 proof had...
November 22, 2023 at 12:57
Can you control or decide what and how you dream during deep sleep? I thought it is impossible for one to control, think, decide in one's dream. Isn't...
November 22, 2023 at 12:40
Interesting post from you Bob. :up: By all means, I do look forward to reading your further presentation on the points that you have in mind.
November 22, 2023 at 12:29