Where does "if something cannot be judged" come from? It cannot only be judged because you have brought a highly unlikely, suspicious and groundless c...
I am not sure what the fundamental particles actually means in the empirical world objects. It is another big issue for debating whether particles and...
There are different interpretations on this point. This part seems totally wrong interpretation. Things-in-themselves are for the objects we have conc...
Agreed. It sounds like an extreme subjectivism or solipsism. As long as one's sensibility and understanding works with concept, categories and intuiti...
Where humans don't exist, of course, there is no perception, no thoughts. But we can still make logical inference (from the human world), that things ...
When absence of human thought, the concept of proof cannot be an agenda. The fact that you have been mentioning about the word "proof" proves that you...
I understand Kant's Thing-in-itself, is not everything outside us in the world. If that was the case, Kant would be an extreme sceptic, who professes ...
It would be better if you could define "capable of conceiving" and "to access anything about the external world". What do you mean by these expression...
Your claim that the external world is caused by your internal world is wrong then. You don't have an internal world which weighs a few trillion tons. ...
Kant wouldn't have said that. What Kant would have said is, that even if your sensibility sees a bent stick in the water jug, your category of concept...
I find this difficult to follow. It is like saying that you used your camera, and took a photo of the mountain across the field in your town, and then...
If X doesn't exist outside of RussellA, then X must exist inside of RussellA. This sounds logically unsound. Groundless premise, and unsound conclusio...
People have different ideas on what life is, and how they want to live their life. But then, there are parts of life which all humans share. They get ...
I was just wondering if your use of the word "impression" was Humean, or from the ordinary language. But even for Hume, numbers are concepts which is ...
You still seem to be misunderstanding the difference between the act of counting physical objects, and the ontology of numbers. The two are not the sa...
Is it the Humean impression are you talking about? You are using the concept impression wrong, if it is the Humean. It would make more sense if you us...
You are still seeing an object external to you when you see the bend stick in the water jug. There is no internal world. You have a mental space which...
Well, whatever happened to the man's head, the statue exists. Someone's head going off, doesn't affect the physical or mental existence which has been...
They are external. You can think about it, because you have the concepts in your mind. How do you know your pain is real? What if it were just itchy s...
You know that even if your eyesight is bad, and cannot see the road, the road exists. You know when your memory and eyesights are both bad, so you can...
It is good to see you are now accepting that numbers are concepts. It is a progress. But you still seem to insist that there are numbers which are phy...
Possible worlds, and worlds in your imagination and memories exist in your mind, but they don't cause your perception for the external world. Kant's f...
I didn't quite understand what you meant by "uncouple seeing the road from the road's existence as a thing-in-itself." in your replies, hence asked to...
Numbers are concepts which describe the objects and the world with the values. They are not the objects themselves, and they are definitely not physic...
I didn't ask about the five operators. There are around 50 - 60 different type of Logic schools all dealing with different type of events and contents...
Surely we perceive the world via our senses doesn't necessarily mean that the world doesn't exist? If it is due to limits and faults of human senses, ...
Is using the countable things only way teaching and learning the elementary maths? This was not about material things. It just meant to say that you c...
What branch of Logic is this? What do you mean by this? Could you please rephrase it? How do you uncouple seeing the road from the road's existence as...
I don't recall seeing it at all. Or anyone who claims to have witnessed the Big Bang. Could it happen again? Or is it still happening the now? There i...
Saying memory can be unreliable therefore numbers are physical is a poor logic. Memory is an ability of the brain which is a biological organ. Of cour...
Sure, I am not saying it is not allowed to have conjectures and hypothesis on time travel. My point was the claim that "If X, Y, Z, then time travel i...
I heard that Japanese folks have their own time system counting from their monarch's coronation days. So they run their king's name and year 25 or 30 ...
They seemed to be the concluding statements from your arguments. No I didn't deny anything about Kant or 1776. My point was that you need to prove you...
Time exists, but not in the way the would-be time travellers think. :D If you established your own country or created your own world, then you could r...
Concepts and data can exist without the physical objects purely in the minds. Do you need the physical reality and objects when you imagine, remember ...
No. I never said that. You are either misquoting me, or not reading my posts properly. Before the linkage numbers are concepts. After the linkage, the...
Your points were that numbers are material and physical. My point is that numbers are mental and conceptual. Again as above, your points were that num...
And another thing, forgot to add. Your concluding claims are all in "If" form. They are not propositions. They are hypothesises and conjectures themse...
Of course there are changes in the physical world and bodies. But that is not time. Time is measured quantities. There are durations and intervals, wh...
From my own perspective, time doesn't exist. It is a mental concept. There is only "Now", no past and no future. What you call the past is your memory...
Comments