Corvus

Your posts are biased and full of distortion of the facts as usual. I don't see a point in philosophical discourse with you either. You claim that you...

At least, I presented the logic that I have never lied. And I have now the evidence of your post quote, you starting your post with ad hominem insults...

Yes, he made his post sounding like that. Do you still not understand any simile or metaphor expressions in English? Hey look, if you don't have any m...

That is not logic. Logic must have premises and conclusions. The premises must be backed up by the evidence. You don't seem to know even what Logic me...

What can the system tell us about the cat next door? The grey coloured cat keeps coming into our garden looking for something often.

Still speaking on behalf of Banno? Look I am not interested in your ad hominem posts begging for attention. I am here to read and discuss philosophy.

You don't present any logic in your claims and statements. You just imagine that I didn't say something, and that is the only ground for your false cl...

See your ad hominem attacks on other interlocutors from the beginning of your posts? That is not a good manner at all. Please just discuss the philoso...

See? That was what I meant. You don't even understand the point, but rubbish it as wrong. How absurd is that. By the way, you are still in deep illusi...

I have not made many claims quoting hundreds of philosophers. That is just another distortion of the truth with exaggeration. My point was simple, and...

Not sure how the AI could know anything about the world, if they are locked up in the analytic cave. Doesn't sound very convincing in the system opera...

Isn't it exactly the point Quine disagrees with? Some self-evident knowledge without proof can be also self-deceiving too. What if {cats} was someone'...

I wonder if it is simple as that. Who judges what is moral or immoral? If someone with power and authority comes along, and says to you cutting grass ...

I was just telling you about Pinter's book to say that even classic Set theory books admit the historical controversies with the concept of infinity. ...

If I really lied, then I would have told you that I lied, which is true. But you claim that I lied, which is false, and a lie. I didn't lie, but you c...

Putnam edited a book called Philosophy of Mathematics Selected readings. He put in there various articles by different people. It is not a book solely...

Under your thinking, anyone not thinking the same as you is misattributing everything. That is just nonsense. Under your eyes, people shouldn't be thi...

Not sure on Mathematicians, but if they are logical, I would presume they would. Maybe. I don't see much practical point apart from filling in and add...

Many still believe it is controversial, and I do too. No one is saying it is illegal to use it, but just pointing out the existence of the controversy...

It is a metaphor from my point of view. It is obvious, and I have kindly explained it to you above. It a way of expression saying, when something is s...

You start your post with throwing insults to others before even going into the points under discussion. What courtesy are you talking about?

You obviously have problem understanding metaphors and ordinary use of English language. You seem to bite into a little words in the expressions, and ...

Of course it is a book of Set Theory. However, it explains the historical background of the concept of infinity how controversial the concept was in d...

It is his metaphor, meaning that even if you claim it is "infinite", it is actually "finite". It is a type of cynicism. He uses aphorism a lot in his ...

If you trace back Tone's posts, he starts with ad hominem before getting into philosophy. And you blindly take his side condoning his absurd and incor...

Your problem is that you make out as if what you and your cliques say are the only truth, and the rest of the world are false. Many would believe that...

Ok whatever. Have a good day. cheers.

Most of your own posts are filled with distortions. See that's what I meant. You don't recall you have been writing in your own posts.

I am only replying to your posts, the way they are. But you two Laurel and Hardy are not worth the time. All the best.

Stop distorting the facts, and be your own man and honest to yourself.

It sounds like you are a little string controlled doll in Banno's pocket.

Your sayings and actions are totally different. You don't even know what you have been saying, but denying it. That is truly incorrigible.

You do. But of course you won't admit it. The concept of infinity is for description of motions, actions and operations. The use of infinity in the se...

You speak for Banno, and now trying to speak for me? It seems obvious your whole purpose of coming into the forum is forcing people to admit errors wh...

Pure nonsense from the pair. You two have been degrading the whole discussions into a comedy.

You don't seem to even know who said what, and what was whose points, and just get into ad hominem all the time. Would you say your postings are high ...

You better ask Wittgenstein what he meant by that. I have my own point. What with you?

You sounded as if Wittgenstein was irrelevant in math. That sounded not intelligent or read in philosophy. You keep misunderstanding which was the par...

Your claim was out of point from the start, because you see the discussion in the quote as discussion in talking. It is the concept of infinity in Mat...

To me, it was clear that Wittgenstein meant infinite in mathematics means finite, hence mathematician's discussions will end. - He denies the concept ...

No time for that. You just call anyone trolling if you haven't understood something? He seemed to be saying discussions are finite, and all discussion...

It was me who addressed at the very first, which was ignored. I addressed it again. I still have the details of the reasons somewhere. I don't. I have...

I thought when I said that you would know whom I was referring to.

Please do some searches and reading on Wittgenstein's infinity.

It was just to let you know it was what Wittgenstein was saying, and he was a great philosopher of language, logic and mathematics.

You don't seem to know anything about Wittgenstein anyway from your posts. Wittgenstein's whole philosophy is about mathematics and grammar. He was al...

Not only your reading on Wittgenstein is wrong, but also you seem to be misunderstanding many things in philosophy. It is not just this thread, but al...

Ok, you can interpret him whatever way you want. But it doesn't make sense. That is the point. It is not just mathematician's discussions which end. A...

How can anyone admit error when the other party is pushing his wrong ideas with the misinterpretation of Wittgenstein, and inability to explain fully ...

You haven't even explained what "infinity" means. W. would have said, there is no meaning on which things that cannot be described in words.