OK fair enough. But you know philosophical topics cannot be discussed meaningfully without reference to reality and the facts of the world we live in....
Substance is a form of physical matter i.e. tangible, visible, locatable ...etc. God is not a physical matter, is it? Could you prove God is a physica...
When you say A caused B, you must be able to give out the detail of the cause. Simply saying A caused B, is not meaningful or informative. If a stone ...
Time as human invention is what we use in daily life. But I don't believe it is time itself, even if it is also significant part of time. There seem t...
Time is known to be eternal and non stoppable. It keeps flowing even all your watches and clocks stopped. Even when someone died, time keeps flowing. ...
Saying X is a substance sounds not informative. It needs further elaboration with detail and evidence. The creator of the creation from nothing? What ...
When you say something is innate, what does that mean? I would say innate means we have them without experience of the external world, or we have it f...
If dichotomy is the nature of time, which one is the real time? What necessitates the "co-arising"? How could subjectivity co-arises with the objectiv...
Time itself doesn't have past present future. It is us who divide time into those categories depending on what point, and what part of time we want to...
What is substance? Would it be some sort of mass or matter? Mass or matter would be perceivable i.e. sensible i.e. tangible, visible and locatable. Is...
I have missed this post. Apologies. Belated welcome to the thread. I think I said it in some other replies the same answer. "time doesn't exist" doesn...
What does "God changes" mean here? Is it physical change or metaphysical change? Changes can happen in different levels i.e. physical, logical, metaph...
If you posit time into two different types, then which one is the real time? Are the two different times synchronisable in any way? Would it not creat...
remanens capax mutationem ? - I need to go and think about it for a while to see what it actually means. Being seems to be another vast topic in Philo...
From my understanding, Buddhists claim there is no eternity and no self. Time is known to be eternal. Could it mean Buddhists deny time too? Would be ...
Yes, you are correct here. In theory, the ordered relation is true, but in reality they are one. If you think about it, future continuously becomes pr...
It sounds illogical to be able to imagine a world independent of mind, when imagining is a function mind. Human mind must have the common objective ca...
But you can only access all the past and future from present. Past has gone and not accessible from present unless from the memory and experience. Fut...
Es bueno saber que hay muchos grandes filósofos en los países de habla hispana. Leer y estudiar sus obras nos brindará perspectivas interesantes y alt...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Ortega_y_Gasset Es un nombre nuevo para mí en filosofía, pero parece ser un gran filósofo, especialmente para ...
Time doesn't reveal itself either. Moreover isn't all Being temporal? Therefore time is a part of Being. That idea just passed by me. It could be wron...
I thought your point was the argument is from the paradoxes made up randomly with the false statements or something like that. So if contradiction is ...
That is not false statements in the rule of logical proof. If I could recall it correctly, you can make up the molecular statements from atomic statem...
But when you are reflecting the events in past, present and future, they don't need to always in the order of the past -> present -> future. You could...
OK, FJ, going to back to your initial point, you claimed my argument is made up of a bunch of paradoxes. If you could point out exactly which part of ...
Thank you for your kind comment, Arcane Sandwich. As you rightly pointed out, I am not a logician at all. I have read only a book or two on Elementary...
If you bring in irrational premises to the conclusion in the argument, then it doesn't get accepted in higher standard of logic. That's nothing to do ...
The best track record? Well, when 100s of blind men were shouting out the elephant must look like a rubber pipe standing up after feeling one of its l...
If you read about the rules of logical proof, then maybe you would understand them? It is elementary basic rules viz. rules of elimination, assumption...
No one has chosen their genes. But people don't blame their genes for the choices they have made. Free will is your mental state, which has nothing to...
Comments