You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Corvus

Comments

My Hegel books. https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54384982002_68e2dea753_c.jpg
March 14, 2025 at 11:36
Ok, good idea. Will update soon.
March 14, 2025 at 00:54
I have Hegel's Philosophy of Religion, Phenomenology of Spirit and some other books too. I need to get back to reading them. I did read a couple of in...
March 14, 2025 at 00:40
I feel Hegel is an important and significant philosopher, and was planning to read his original texts sometime. His metaphysics, and philosophy of rel...
March 14, 2025 at 00:36
In Logic Lecture book, it says logic is derived from reason. and is is a doctrine, it provides rules / it is a demonstrated theory. It contains the gr...
March 14, 2025 at 00:27
I did read some commentary books on Hegel. I did not read any of his original works. Cool. You must be very much familiar with Hegel's system. :up:
March 14, 2025 at 00:15
Ok, fair enough. I was wondering if reason and logic are the same or separate faculties in Kant. If they are the separate faculties, then they might c...
March 14, 2025 at 00:11
Believing in certainty and high possibility would be trust. Isn't believing in impossibility faith?
March 13, 2025 at 22:04
Where is the place for the religious belief or faith in life after death?
March 13, 2025 at 20:43
Purpose for what? Isn't purpose from your psychology? Under what evidence is it the case? Gadamer was into Hegel stuff for mainly on hermeneutics, but...
March 13, 2025 at 20:16
Your writings are ambiguous in what it is trying to say. My point was clear. If reason is based on logic, then they are likely to conflict on their ju...
March 13, 2025 at 20:14
When there are the official definition of formal logic, describing logic in commonly and loosely was a bit odd. We do use symbols extensively in all s...
March 13, 2025 at 17:48
What do you mean by a paralogical bi-reality? Could you elaborate on that please? We are not just matter. Isn't extended or extension a property of ma...
March 13, 2025 at 16:14
Great summary :up: however a few points ... Formal logic means the type of logic which uses symbols and formal languages for analysing the statements ...
March 13, 2025 at 15:53
Cartesian idea of body and soul is rejected by many contemporaries as an outdated and invalid theory for the fact, that body and mind dualism cannot b...
March 13, 2025 at 12:48
Kant lived in the earlier times than Hegel. How could Kant have had been a Hegelian? Could Plato have had been Heideggerian? :D
March 13, 2025 at 11:34
For Hegel contradiction is the essential element in the changes and progress of the world. Kant's logic was not formal logic. It was transcendental lo...
March 13, 2025 at 09:03
Memories seem to play a part in dreams, but they are not exactly correct memories of the past. You might just see something you have had experience wi...
March 12, 2025 at 21:07
Ok, good point. Another reason that it is not causal reaction is that, when you say X is caused by Y. Y must cause on all instances of X i.e. if the d...
March 12, 2025 at 17:14
Isn't it just contingent or random events or responses? To say X is caused by Y, Y must be possible to repeat for more observations to see if X will h...
March 12, 2025 at 13:49
Are you not confounding knowledge about an objective reality with mind-independent world here?
March 12, 2025 at 10:37
There seem to be two options. 1) Mind-independent world doesn't exist. It is a figment of our imagination like flying horse or golden mountain or merm...
March 12, 2025 at 09:28
Could you describe what mind-independent world could be?
March 12, 2025 at 09:11
X is a free variable. It can take any value in it. X could have been a statue of Pegasus for its original value. Your inability to understand even wha...
March 12, 2025 at 09:08
They are subjective mental states, nothing to do with knowledge. If you have knowledge of something, then you must be able to verify, demonstrate and ...
March 11, 2025 at 22:07
When there are discrepancies in the claims of knowledge on the same situation or object between different folks, you always have chance to carry out t...
March 11, 2025 at 15:50
But if X was originally a statue of X, then a statue of X is X. No? The concept of 14 is 14.
March 11, 2025 at 09:18
You need to check and find out what the red coloured object is you are seeing. Just claiming you are seeing red coloured object doesn't mean much and ...
March 11, 2025 at 09:05
You need to check if you were wearing red coloured eye glasses, or perhaps you might have developed problems with your sights? Or indeed there is an o...
March 11, 2025 at 08:50
What was his view on it?
March 11, 2025 at 08:33
If you think, imagine, remember or believe in the existence of the large desk, then it is idea of the desk in your mind. If you stand in front of the ...
March 11, 2025 at 08:31
I knew what you meant. No misunderstanding there at all. At the point where experience is limited, inference takes place.
March 11, 2025 at 00:07
You seem to have misunderstood the inference as a declaration, hence pointed it out.
March 10, 2025 at 23:56
No. It is not a declaration. It is only an inference from what we see from the dead, and we also reason and infer the same situation to the ultimate f...
March 10, 2025 at 23:47
There is no such thing as eternal oblivion. Even when you fall asleep at night, you don't notice time while you were sleeping. You close and open the ...
March 10, 2025 at 23:18
For empirical cases like seeing colour red, you must go out and investigate further and verify for the truth, if needed. Seeing the colour red is just...
March 10, 2025 at 17:57
Your seeing colour red is not knowledge. You are just making a statement on your seeing colour red, and that is all. That colour red could be anything...
March 10, 2025 at 17:51
Perception cannot give us knowledge. It can only present with what is perceived in the form of raw data i.e. shapes, colours, sounds, words and motion...
March 10, 2025 at 16:15
Does it mean that Indirect Realist can only have beliefs? No knowledge at all? And likewise, Direct Relists can only have knowledge? No beliefs at all...
March 10, 2025 at 13:21
1) What is the significance of direct and indirect knowledge? 2) Indirect or direct on relation to what? 3) What are the differences in direct and ind...
March 10, 2025 at 12:01
Thanks for the clarification. That sounds confusing. Is it not the other way around? Are you sure you haven't put them wrong way around in the definit...
March 10, 2025 at 10:04
You seem to be confusing the point that I was trying to point out the fact that transcendental idealism has problem of having dualistic view of the wo...
March 10, 2025 at 09:27
An object can be both mental and physical. If you imagined a winged horse, that winged horse is your mental object. If you saw one made of physical ma...
March 10, 2025 at 09:10
Does it mean you are oblivious, even if you will not know you are oblivious?
March 10, 2025 at 09:05
So Pegasus is a word without its object? Are there objects without their words / names?
March 09, 2025 at 23:39
When there is no mind to perceive, is eternal oblivion possible?
March 09, 2025 at 23:33
Yes, I agree that our ideas can be passed onto other minds in forms of materialised media, books, words, music, arts etc. And when those materialised ...
March 09, 2025 at 23:27
:up: How can a mythical creature be real? Mythical already implies not real.
March 09, 2025 at 23:08
It was not transcendental idealism I was trying to describe. It was ideal realism I was trying to describe. So what is your account of non-novice vers...
March 09, 2025 at 23:07
Coherence comes from your reasoning, not from perception. You must ask yourself why your reasoning cannot understand your own perception. Idealism is ...
March 09, 2025 at 18:36