You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mongrel

Comments

Behaviorism was once a popular opposing view, but Chomsky squashed it. It still lingers in various forms.
September 07, 2016 at 20:36
Hmm. Cool.
September 07, 2016 at 20:34
It would be contrasted with behaviorism and probably non-reductive. The idea is that thought takes place in the domain of mental representations. Inte...
September 07, 2016 at 20:29
Yep. Without some sort of non-idea, it wouldn't make much sense to talk about ideas.
September 07, 2016 at 20:16
I don't quite understand the question, hunter.
September 07, 2016 at 20:14
No, I don't think so. It's just that if you agree that anytime we respond and interact with the world, ideas are attached to what we respond to, then ...
September 07, 2016 at 20:09
Cool... where is that?
September 07, 2016 at 14:55
/uploads/resized/files/xu/s962u8uh6k67r06r.jpg I didn't escape but I have big plans for my reincarnation. Prisma is fun. It's not Photoshop... But if ...
September 07, 2016 at 14:50
Holy Guacamole!
September 07, 2016 at 14:35
The forms I referred to were candles and puddles. But if you like molecules better.. the hydrocarbons can take the form of a number of molecules. And....
September 07, 2016 at 14:34
Starvation is likely to intensify self-consciousness because it's a crisis. It's something that will be remembered. Myths will be told about it... how...
September 07, 2016 at 12:55
Oh, cool. Thanks!
September 07, 2016 at 12:11
:)
September 07, 2016 at 12:11
Well what's your ontological view then? Are you an idealist?
September 07, 2016 at 12:10
I think to some extent it's neither. There's a problem with oppressed people agreeing with their oppressors...like a giant case of Stockholm syndrome....
September 07, 2016 at 12:01
I think it's natural for the oppressed to feel angry and full of hatred. Those are potentially toxic emotions. I don't mean to sniff at the psychologi...
September 07, 2016 at 11:49
Thanks for that, mcdoodle. Author is a god's-eye-view.... or is it? You're saying the objective picture can be populated with noise. The author does t...
September 07, 2016 at 00:11
You can add in a somersault if you want.
September 06, 2016 at 16:41
Digital model. Hmm. Different tack: I think we can discover whether the categories we're talking about are apriori or aposteriori using the Locke/Hume...
September 06, 2016 at 16:37
You're saying the primal distinction is between the cake and the not-cake. You can't digitize the Continuum Cake. It has a high glue content and it ju...
September 06, 2016 at 15:57
It can be a matter of temperament (so relying heavily on emotional bias). It's also possible to accept and reject it at the same time (as in the case ...
September 06, 2016 at 15:50
You can't take it up with math. You can ask a phil-o-math person... which would obviously be Nagase, but he's busy writing some thesis. To review.. th...
September 06, 2016 at 15:40
"And that's how we make the golf ball go into the hole!" -Zeno That's my Zeno impression. Later, I'll do my Aristotle explains what all of this has to...
September 06, 2016 at 15:12
Not for me. I've never had a particularly clear sense of identity. Being somewhat amorphous is my homebase. The OP came from a passage in a book: Phil...
September 06, 2016 at 12:08
I think this passage is explaining what I was trying to say... that if you have a cake for which the law of excluded middle fails, you can't just slic...
September 06, 2016 at 12:01
To remember is literally to re-present... or try to, anyway. Yep... I'm more and more convinced that it has to do with time.
September 06, 2016 at 00:42
/uploads/resized/files/jl/a0pueuvr34vij41f.jpg I'm not sure why Vin Diesel was trying to kill me.
September 06, 2016 at 00:11
/uploads/resized/files/bk/kiy52cilqc4ti3rx.jpg
September 05, 2016 at 21:20
Leak?
September 05, 2016 at 18:19
Candle melts into a puddle. The wax in the candle is now in the puddle. It's definitely the same wax.
September 05, 2016 at 18:12
Yep.. we all have an amazing digitizer. We call it a mind. :) I don't like that smiley face. Can't we get different ones?
September 05, 2016 at 14:41
It's also appealing because scientists note that humans are distinct from chimps because we look into each others' eyes a lot. In the ongoing quest to...
September 05, 2016 at 14:29
Think about the notion that the digital is a subset of the analog.... as if the analog is made up of discrete points and the digital is just some of t...
September 05, 2016 at 14:21
So.. that was what you meant in the OP?
September 05, 2016 at 13:58
That form and material are distinct was all the point I was making to Terrapin.
September 05, 2016 at 13:42
In that case, the thesis would be that nature is fundamentally digital. . The same information can be transmitted digitally or by analog means. So.......
September 05, 2016 at 13:40
Kind of... in electronics, we think of ideal square waves, knowing that in the real world, instantaneous changes of that kind don't happen. As TGW men...
September 05, 2016 at 13:36
This has been pointed out to you before: if there's some base level of granularity in your analog, then you're dealing with something that's fundament...
September 05, 2016 at 13:30
Everybody else would say it's the same wax. Candle melts, we're left with a puddle. Its the same wax. Therefore, the wax is not identical to any parti...
September 05, 2016 at 12:50
Say you encounter some music. Later on, you remember the sounds. You aren't hearing the music now, you're remembering it. Form is what you're left wit...
September 05, 2016 at 12:47
I read the OP, thanks Michael. My point is that claims have been made regarding the relationship between analog and digital that are not true of the c...
September 05, 2016 at 12:41
So the form only appears as distinct when we're looking at events over time. Whoa. It has to do with becoming.
September 05, 2016 at 12:35
Analog and digital are properties of data. The terms are also used to describe electronic design formats. Analog data is continuous like a sine wave. ...
September 05, 2016 at 12:31
So whatever exists is formed. I think that's true. And yet: Imagine a candle melting. The wax had the form of a candle, and now it has the form of a p...
September 05, 2016 at 11:09
I agree with that. So you never sense the uninterpreted or unrepresented. Right?
September 05, 2016 at 10:38
I could take a stab at the question about how the issue bears on formal logic. Logicians get by with very low ambitions. Ontology tends to be in the b...
September 05, 2016 at 10:26
I was talking about representation. How do you see that being related to randomness?
September 05, 2016 at 09:57
I don't think uninterpreted means random.
September 05, 2016 at 09:48
I think you're agreeing that everything we encounter has some kind of form. We never encounter anything that's entirely formless. One way to put it wo...
September 05, 2016 at 09:47
The idea of fate is pretty common. I don't think education would increase the ranks of determinists because people mainly avoid determinism by means o...
September 04, 2016 at 23:59