You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Tyler

Comments

I think that argument depends heavily or the definition of "see". If the definition of "seeing" includes the eyeballs receiving the physical light, th...
March 16, 2018 at 01:07
With a lack of rational comprehension by the one interpreting it, then no evidence. Yes, proving you wrong is convenient, thanks.
March 13, 2018 at 01:59
The evidence is the rationality of the explanation and the function of the process. Quite a bit of explanation, and I could post a link to a lot more ...
March 11, 2018 at 02:59
Ok, but why? Part of the point I posted this, is to get feedback of reasoning or supporting evidence that I'm incorrect, as I haven't come up with muc...
March 09, 2018 at 02:07
That (plus the rest of the sentence) is only a theoretical conclusion warranted by rational interpretation of observations, stated for the potential o...
March 06, 2018 at 04:09
I think I agree that a child born with no senses, would not be conscious. So sensory input is required at some point, to provide information for the b...
March 05, 2018 at 00:55
Thanks, glad to have found this. Interesting that infants don't identify as a separate entity, but I would think that is because they are incapable of...
March 04, 2018 at 04:55
Yes, I agree the mind comprehends info, and I think that's how I have it worded, as in this sentence: "virtually any information can be comprehended",...
March 02, 2018 at 05:38