You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

tom

Comments

Have you got any examples of an Idealist espousing spiritual ideas?
December 01, 2016 at 13:43
The view that autonomous and complex entities are real, is isomorphic with realism. Sorry.
November 30, 2016 at 23:38
You could phrase it differently: A realist holds that, if according to the simplest explanation, an entity is complex and autonomous, then it is real....
November 30, 2016 at 20:24
Things coming into and out of existence depending on whether they are being perceived by a consciouses or not, is hugely complex. Also, while non-exis...
November 29, 2016 at 21:06
What do you gain by adding that much complexity, plus the added problem you have of non-observed-therefore-non-existent reality creating records.
November 29, 2016 at 19:40
Historical revisionism does you no credit. And it is General relativity that curves space-time to the extent that triangle (self-evidently or not) do ...
November 29, 2016 at 16:51
Which makes it difficult to explain how self-evidently true Euclidean space (as Kant thought) got overturned by General Relativity.
November 29, 2016 at 15:33
Why does the "outside world" have a history? Why are there fossils?
November 29, 2016 at 13:21
It seems that solipsism proposes a theory of reality exponentially more complicated than realism without providing an explanatory structure. Solipsism...
November 29, 2016 at 01:24
Why is it a photograph of a forest, and not a photograph of an ocean?
November 28, 2016 at 20:49
David Deutsch on twitter and always answers my questions there. I'd at least try to read the paper I linked to though - the one where the CTD Principl...
November 28, 2016 at 19:42
But if the photograph is of a forest, then does the forest come into existence when you look at the photograph? If not, then why is it a picture of a ...
November 28, 2016 at 19:33
Then why do cameras work, particularly automatic ones?
November 28, 2016 at 14:18
Will a camera suffice, or does it need to be a human.
November 28, 2016 at 13:54
The stick is straight. Looking at a stick does not change its shape.
November 28, 2016 at 13:26
Do you mean lie was the cosmic microwave background real before we predicted it, planned to look for it, but discovered it by accident anyway?
November 28, 2016 at 02:05
Try this http://www.daviddeutsch.org.uk/wp-content/deutsch85.pdf or Google
November 26, 2016 at 13:14
You need to study the scientific method. There is no justification, there are no "good reasons", such things are unobtainable and of no use.
November 25, 2016 at 22:40
Precisely, you will insult me (though you wouldn't dare to do so to my face) but you won't say a word against the Orlando terrorist who targeted homos...
November 25, 2016 at 22:04
But you don't defend the child-brides, you don't defend the raped, you don't defend the beheaded, you don't defend the genocided, or the genitally mut...
November 25, 2016 at 21:17
No, it means that physics is a subset of reason. Science is constrained by the fact that it only deals with physical reality. Reason is not constraine...
November 25, 2016 at 21:12
No aspect of physical reality in non-computable.
November 25, 2016 at 21:11
Best of luck with that. Could you ask them to prove the Principle of the Conservation of Energy while you're at it? The CTD Principle is proved under ...
November 25, 2016 at 21:07
I think you reveal yourself here as an amateur Islamic scholar, unaware of the subtleties, nuances and rules of abrogation in that deeply complex reli...
November 25, 2016 at 20:30
Is Quantum Mechanics true? What has its truth or falsity of quantum mechanics got to do with anybody's mind?
November 25, 2016 at 19:28
Everett's is the only explanation of quantum mechanics known. It is also the only explanation that is testable and which agrees with quantum mechanics...
November 25, 2016 at 14:02
Those sorts of machines already exist, and a theorem regarding proofs in mathematics didn't stop that happening! Quantum computers and classical compu...
November 25, 2016 at 13:58
No, you can't certify any scientific theory as true (for the nth time) and that has been known since at least 1936. Now, what difference does that mak...
November 25, 2016 at 01:36
The British Muslim who was spared jail because he successfully pleaded ignorance that raping a 13yr old is against the law. http://www.dailymail.co.uk...
November 25, 2016 at 01:22
You are a fantasist, conspiracy theorist with no evidence.
November 25, 2016 at 00:56
Nothing in science can be proven true. This isn't news. Godel's theorem is irrelevant. It is logically impossible to certify a physical law as true. T...
November 24, 2016 at 22:52
Muslims are permitted to rape in Europe. Famously one was let off raping a 10yr old boy in Austria. One was spared jail in UK because his plea of igno...
November 24, 2016 at 21:20
You don't need to go to Saudi, Rotherham or Molenbeek will do.
November 24, 2016 at 21:09
ISIS follow the Quran and the Hadith to the letter. Saudi similarly, that is why you can marry a 6yr old there, and why gays, atheists, and sorcerers ...
November 24, 2016 at 21:07
You should read the Quran then.
November 24, 2016 at 20:28
Isn't this just a baseless smear from the DNC playbook. The lie about Putin funding UKIP is in the hands of lawyers in US.
November 24, 2016 at 17:23
What evidence do you have that Putin wants to subjugate Europe? As Putin said, "A nation that cannot protect its own children has no future."
November 24, 2016 at 12:31
And it was inevitable, that the first exit would be a country that was only half in EU any way - no Euro, no Schengen. What is becoming clearer with e...
November 24, 2016 at 03:18
But the information content of DNA can't be anything other than a proposition, whose truth content in objectively measured by comparison with variants...
November 24, 2016 at 02:53
What justification do you have to claim that the DNA encoding does not refer to anything?
November 23, 2016 at 20:51
It means we can conjecture true laws, but just as in mathematics, they cannot be certified as true by any algorithmic process. Not sure why you think ...
November 23, 2016 at 20:01
What does "unintelligible" mean? The laws of physics are all computable - that means that any finite physical system may be simulated to arbitrary acc...
November 23, 2016 at 17:56
What is the difference between the information encoded in DNA and the information encoded in a statement?
November 23, 2016 at 17:13
It doesn't require mathematics. But even IF it did, what implication does Godel hold for simulating reality, or any part of it?
November 23, 2016 at 17:11
IF that were the case, then what has Godel have to do with it? But it's not the case.
November 23, 2016 at 16:22
What is the DNA code a statement about?
November 23, 2016 at 15:48
How does science prove anything? It doesn't! Goldel showed that the overwhelming majority of mathematical truths can't be proved. Not sure why you thi...
November 22, 2016 at 23:47
It seems I must establish a sub-category: 1. Everett got it wrong due to my personal incapacity to comprehend. 1.1 Everett got it even more wrong due ...
November 22, 2016 at 22:00
Do we have to go through Bell's and other associated theorems AGAIN?
November 22, 2016 at 19:00