You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

noAxioms

Comments

Doppler shift, yes. Light is the same speed in any frame. It is not the same frequency or wavelength. Those are frame dependent measurements. A photon...
November 28, 2017 at 19:22
Interesting. Perhaps we could define a duplicate as not just a state, but one that persists for a second or so as a natural duplicate should. A Boltzm...
November 28, 2017 at 16:54
Absolute time is fiction. I can't prove there are no invisible pink unicorns, but I can't detect them either. To say there is no absolute time is to s...
November 28, 2017 at 15:27
Who is wrong? The guy who labelled as a paradox the twin-experiment? It is indeed not a paradox. But you're also labelling it a perceptual problem, so...
November 28, 2017 at 14:50
Who would benefit from hiring a philosopher? The whole point seems to be thinking of things with no practical application. If there is something pract...
November 28, 2017 at 13:54
The type-3 ones are also not other universes, for more or less the same reasons. You mean there is a pile of near-replicas to go with each actual repl...
November 28, 2017 at 13:11
That one makes a bit of a hash of the Copernican principle at least. Ossipoff's initial post on the prior page was such a violation, but there is no s...
November 28, 2017 at 12:38
I comment on something like this earlier. Such a space is not flat, so it would need to be big enough to account for whatever measure of flatness they...
November 28, 2017 at 02:38
OK, My terminology is wrong. Orientable, yes. There is no obvious origin, hence no actual grid. It is the orienting that suggests a preferred referenc...
November 28, 2017 at 02:31
Well, only if the space was smaller than the hubble-sphere (which it very much is in asteroids). You could see the repetitive things line up in certai...
November 28, 2017 at 02:06
I should have quoted more. I meant to ask if there was no grid in the sky if the space was torrid manifold. I then gave the example of the asteroids g...
November 28, 2017 at 02:02
Not always there. No new thing at all, so nothing to always have been there. Schrodinger's cat is the best example. The cat is both dead and alive, wi...
November 28, 2017 at 00:55
Is this true? I play asteroids in a flat 2-torus space, not on the surface of a donut embedded in three-space. If I fly along either axis, I return to...
November 28, 2017 at 00:49
MWI is not an ontological stance. No creation of new universes or new material ('somewhere' as fishfry puts it) occurs, and energy conservation laws a...
November 28, 2017 at 00:02
A bit off topic, but I've always noted that the orientation of the three spatial axes (X, Y, and Z) is arbitrary. If there is an actual x axis, which ...
November 27, 2017 at 23:53
Unconvinced we disproved it. I left convinced that a random stab will hit a zero-probability 'typical number' which are uncountably infinite. There ar...
November 27, 2017 at 21:03
Well, you list others, so there are other known interpretations. Support of MWI is growing among physicists, but it has yet to reach a majority. For t...
November 27, 2017 at 00:59
Well, I hit a different one that cannot be hit, so I'm on thin ice to counter this. But having hit this computable number, I must in addition throw in...
November 26, 2017 at 23:07
Trying to discredit my own statements. You take a stab at a number line with a pointer and you will hit a 'typical number' as I call it. That number c...
November 26, 2017 at 22:54
.3333... is not a sequence of random digits with equal probability. It is in fact the decimal notation for 1/3, something that can be expressed in a f...
November 26, 2017 at 22:40
I am told that contemporary models are not of infinite comoving space. Not being an expert, I have no ground to assert otherwise. So yes, I backtracke...
November 26, 2017 at 22:17
If so, the dup-Earth bit kinda falls apart, eh? No, disagree with this. A finite sequence has a nonzero probability. An infinite one is not a specific...
November 26, 2017 at 21:56
Good point. Isn't just a curvature measurement enough? If flat enough, there are places sufficiently separated to never interact. Yes, expansion is re...
November 26, 2017 at 21:45
Indeed, it doesn't require infinite space. It (a type 1 world, not a duplicate) does at least require an expanding universe, else eventually light wou...
November 26, 2017 at 04:03
Models say otherwise. For the distance to be finite, there would need to be an edge where there is stuff only on one side, and not uniform as we see i...
November 26, 2017 at 03:42
They're not separate universes (especially types 1 and 3), just separate worlds in this universe. For type 1, the distant Earth is a true duplicate. T...
November 26, 2017 at 02:54
It is a Tegmark designation, and I'm not sure how much the video gets into it. Type (or level) 1: Places that are too distant to causally interact wit...
November 26, 2017 at 02:10
I didn't watch the linked video. For the record, quantum mechanics does not say the multiverse is real or is not. Not sure what 'physics' is wrong or ...
November 26, 2017 at 00:33
Yes there is such a law, and it is used in the articles linked. They've demonstrated the accuracy of some clock to X digits, and not by using a more a...
November 22, 2017 at 22:24
OK, we're taking completely different things then. Ignore what I've said.
November 21, 2017 at 01:39
Not sure what all else to explain. A photon, or anything else with no rest-mass, is missing half the properties of a classic object due to the inabili...
November 21, 2017 at 00:39
Exactly so. Light has no frame, travels in no specific direction, cannot rest, has no mass and exists in no time of its own. But all these things are ...
November 20, 2017 at 19:33
Causality is what distinguishes the temporal dimension from the other ones.
November 20, 2017 at 18:36
If you have a pulse, you have a clock. Lousy precision, but a clock nevertheless. You can time the boiling of your egg by counting heartbeats.The coun...
November 20, 2017 at 15:19
In the spacetime model, the temporal dimension is distance just like the other three. There is physical distance between any two events, and that dist...
November 20, 2017 at 12:54
Read the links fdrake posted. They answer exactly this question. At the sort of accuracy they're talking, two clocks would need to be in exactly the s...
November 20, 2017 at 12:34
You were doing fine until here. That was not the negation. The negation of the latter sentence is "Caesar is not a number that is prime".
November 09, 2017 at 23:00
I think you ask about what if the radioactive same ticked regularly. Then the decays would not be random events, but regular ones. All similar-rate sa...
November 08, 2017 at 18:16
My counter example works fine with nanoseconds. The radioactive samples might tick every nanosecond and the example still holds. The two samples would...
November 08, 2017 at 18:13
Without the precision required to navigate a boat. I didn't say it was done without time measurement. Massive precision is needed only for more recent...
November 08, 2017 at 16:55
This is true of weight pendulums like the one in a grandfather clock. Such clocks run slow on the moon for instance. There is a mass-pendulum in my wa...
November 07, 2017 at 14:15
It is reasonably constant, and the Newton's laws of motion (the first two mostly) say this. This is not proof, just a very successful set of laws that...
November 07, 2017 at 12:47
No. No clock is needed to know this. The average length of the day is the arbitrary standard. There is nothing against which it needs to be verified.
November 06, 2017 at 20:11
No clock was used to verify this. Clocks were made to sync to this. The day verifies the clock, not the other way around. For the length of the day to...
November 06, 2017 at 16:44
It is not constant. Ever notice all the complexity of the pendulum on a grandfather clock, with all those bars made of different metals? It's not just...
November 06, 2017 at 14:11
Wrong conclusion. It finds that current models don't necessarily match what is seen. If the findings were accurate, the universe should be different, ...
November 05, 2017 at 23:45
Because you get the exact same result from countless repeatings of the experiment. I get different results from the time measurement of my grass to gr...
November 05, 2017 at 13:12
Sure, a tagged oxygen atom is likely to survive 2000 years I think, and would most likely be found still on Earth, in a place of highest oxygen densit...
October 30, 2017 at 16:32
Events are still usually ordered under determinism. 2017 is after 1917, so the relations 'before' and 'after' have meaning just like the relations 'ab...
October 23, 2017 at 02:58
So all of language is wrong if eternalism is the case? I don't consider saying that "Xmas will be on a Monday" to be an assertion of presentism. It's ...
October 22, 2017 at 18:09