You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Clarendon

Comments

Yes, it would only be a heuristic and so would not assume AI is actually a person. It's just that - with a few notable exceptions - the ethical verdic...
October 13, 2025 at 00:21
Yes, precisely.
October 12, 2025 at 03:53
Isn't the best policy simply to treat AI as if it were a stranger? So, for instance, let's say I've written something and I want someone else to read ...
October 11, 2025 at 21:45
Thank you for your very thought provoking response. And I agree that it is vulnerable in the way you mention and have been pondering this. I mentioned...
October 10, 2025 at 20:52
Well, I suppose my point is that the moral premises of my argument are very strong. Someone who denies that anything has intrinsic moral value would a...
October 07, 2025 at 22:42
I am not sure I can, not unless I am being asked to think of a very tiny shaped thing. But anyway, I think this misses the point - which is that whate...
October 07, 2025 at 22:36
As it is often put, a valid deductive argument extracts the implications of its premises. That's its function. I assume that it is no vice in an argum...
October 07, 2025 at 22:26
I am not sure how plausible it is to claim that every existing thing has intrinsic value. Does a germ have intrinsic moral value? Maybe everything doe...
October 07, 2025 at 04:43
I admit that I am groping around in the dark where views about essential properties are concerned. I suppose that if someone says humans are essential...
October 07, 2025 at 04:38
However, though a physical thing's shape and size and location can change, it doesn't seem possible for it not to have a shape, size or location. The ...
October 07, 2025 at 03:59
I take 'intrinsic' moral value to be moral value that is supervening on something's essential properties. i take that to be true by definition. So, I ...
October 05, 2025 at 23:37
Another form of what is essentially the same argument focusses instead on candidate essential properties of physical things - such as shape and size a...
October 05, 2025 at 22:38
"First you say that your premise "is consistent with ," but then you go on to say that the whole argument entails the proposition that no physical thi...
October 05, 2025 at 22:29
I don't think that's widely accepted. The notion of 'intrinsic moral value' doesn't seem to presuppose a divine command theory of ethics. As I underst...
October 05, 2025 at 21:56
I take it to be a conceptual truth that moral properties supervene on other properties. That is, there is always a 'because' where something's possess...
October 05, 2025 at 21:53
Although we are essentially objects, I don't think that fact about us can be what our intrinsic moral value supervenes on, for that would then mean th...
October 05, 2025 at 21:47
I am glad you think the argument has some merit. I mean by "X is an essential property of Y" metaphysical essence - so, something that makes it the ki...
October 05, 2025 at 05:09
No, I wouldn't say that the attitude is intrinsic to the thing. Rather, something essential to the thing is what is responsible for my valuing attitud...
October 05, 2025 at 02:32
Thank you for your reply. That something is morally valuable would be a property of that thing. But it would be a supervenient property, meaning that ...
October 05, 2025 at 01:30