Thanks a lot for the critique of my introductory paragraph. I feel that I did in fact misrepresent the essay quite a bit in the introduction, as I did...
Yeah, that is a real puzzle. Dostoevsky & Nietzsche did think that the transition of society from a theist worldview to secularism would destroy this ...
Oh okay. I mean, you have a fundamental disagreement with the premise of the article. I did not author that premise, and it is what I am using to refu...
Objectivity implies (by def.) that it is independent of human conscience. Can a book, or art, be judged independent of the mind's involvement? Probabl...
Interesting take! First is the obvious problem: natural laws falling into external contingency. The laws are, as you point out, fundamental. They exis...
This premise is derived from John Lennox's use of theistic evolution as an appeal that we should be able to trust our rationality. The simple statemen...
Let's start from here. "It is good because God loves it," points out that good is derived from God. There is an equivalence proposed by Alston..... "W...
I would disagree with the rigidity of this notion. Suppose this pen which I am holding has a sufficient reason for why I am spinning it. Furthermore, ...
I try to tackle on the impossibility of irrationality that the teleological argument proposes, specifically when it is used as an appeal that we shoul...
Some theists might push it onto God. But I do still believe that if you think divinely guided evolution because of which we are rational beings is rig...
The theist here would argue: because it is an action warranted by God. At the least, the word 'ought' or 'should' suggests a verdict, and thus mandate...
Comments