Psychopathy is an illness, so this is an unfortunate demonstration. Murder is principally wrong because it goes against the nature of life itself. Thi...
For physical laws, that is the dead world, we can state scientific facts about it because we can put distance between it and us. But when we come to l...
@"bahman" I am also interested in the phenomenon of guilt, but I think we should first learn more about it. Your question seems too simplistic to me. ...
@"SonJnana" I tried to avoid stating this, because it is basically off-topic, but you are right that we can't demonstrate objectivity of moral values ...
If we hold the opinion "killing is bad" as merely a subjective value with nothing objective that gives it content, than it would be equally viable tha...
i understand your position. And as I have said, we reached a point that leads us towards a more general discussion: the relationship between subjectiv...
The way I see it is that if something evolved over time on the level of all that is living, that automatically means that it had to be so as the conse...
It may have been so, but it's very unlikely and to me doesn't make much sense. If you believe that killing is not natural on an objective level, thing...
The way to distinguish that it is 1) that applies and not 2) is this: if 2) applied, than refrain from killing would be an evolutionary phenomenon, an...
All the way I was presuming that organisms feel and act as they do as the consequence of the universal law. If we view life as a complex system, that ...
Well, killing is nothing else but a survival strategy. When you say "objectively morally wrong to kill", you are basically abstracting away killing as...
I can demonstrate what you ask. It has been shown by scientist that not only man, but animals in general have an innate emotional refrain from killing...
SonJnana, I think you don't understand that people and life itself are not one and the same thing. People indeed have different moral ideas, but life ...
Comments