Arcane Sandwich

Comments

It is.
February 15, 2025 at 23:41
It's never to late to be Edge. Not as in Edge Lords, but in the Syracuse (New York) sense of it.
February 15, 2025 at 23:40
You arguably should be. At least one, if not all three.
February 15, 2025 at 23:39
Hey, pilots use it. That's arguably a legit use of an illegal substance.
February 15, 2025 at 23:38
So, in your view, "End of story, really." is a legit thing to say, but "End of History" somehow is not?
February 15, 2025 at 23:32
There's a Thread that I started about the alignment chart in D&D, maybe we can talk there, about this issue. Perhaps we may continue this conversation...
February 15, 2025 at 23:30
No problem, happy to help :up: Here's more information about the references: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draconomicon
February 15, 2025 at 21:53
All of that is in the references that I told you.
February 15, 2025 at 21:51
If you want to know more about them, I just gave you two references.
February 15, 2025 at 21:47
All of your questions have their corresponding answers in the 2nd and 3rd Editions of the Draconomicon.
February 15, 2025 at 21:46
Yes, that one in particular is worse than the oil slick.
February 15, 2025 at 21:44
Sugar should be a schedule 1 drug. Please contribute to my Thread, it's in the Lounge. Nevermind.
February 15, 2025 at 21:41
Those aren't pigs. They're piglets.
February 15, 2025 at 21:36
Very interesting.
February 15, 2025 at 21:34
In: E = mc²  — view comment
Nonsense.
February 15, 2025 at 21:31
Hegel's Mind is dead. Mine is not. Therefore: My own mind > Hegel's Mind.
February 15, 2025 at 21:27
Mine does not. My own mind > Hegel's Mind.
February 15, 2025 at 21:26
I don't like the sound of that.
February 15, 2025 at 21:26
MoK a Dragon, what do you expect?
February 15, 2025 at 20:57
Doesn't matter. Carry on.
February 15, 2025 at 20:35
Cool. Glad to have you here. Thanks. Hmmm, well for the topic of this Thread specifically, I think that the paradigmatic example for this discussion i...
February 15, 2025 at 20:35
What are your thoughts on Emerson's Transcendentalism? What are your thoughts on Peirce's Reasonableness? What do you think of Materialism?
February 15, 2025 at 20:22
Spoken like a True Australian. For your Nuclear Power Plants of The Future?
February 15, 2025 at 20:20
But I stopped. So, I complied with his request.
February 15, 2025 at 20:18
That sounds like quackery.
February 15, 2025 at 20:07
If anyone would like to help me with my science project, then please provide your honest answers to the following list of questions: (1) Can I turn Ch...
February 15, 2025 at 19:59
According to who? Nothing wrong with that. No, don't let it alone. It's an important problem in contemporary metaphysics. Then here's my proposal, old...
February 15, 2025 at 19:49
No, I don't want any of this, that's neither benevolence nor malevolence, it's either neutral morality ("neutrevalence", or "neutral balance", if you ...
February 15, 2025 at 19:42
Yes it can, have you ever played Dungeons & Dragons? I'm :100: confident that I can create not one, but three types of Evil A.I.s, like so: AI1 = Lawf...
February 15, 2025 at 19:41
I don't. I agree with the last part, I don't agree with the first part.
February 15, 2025 at 19:36
May I chime in? Here's the thing, people. It's much simpler than what all of you are saying. A good regulator = a good unofficial moderator. As such, ...
February 15, 2025 at 19:33
Coffee is dangerous, but I propose we move this discussion over to the relevant Thread that I just started for this specific Topic, please.
February 15, 2025 at 19:21
Ok, I'll do that in a second. Give me a minute so that I can start the Thread, it will go in the Lounge. Then I'll edit this comment with the link. Ye...
February 15, 2025 at 19:11
Maybe = modal operator for "maybe".
February 15, 2025 at 19:09
I'm not sure. Maybe. You seem to have some sort of point, but it's a bit unclear. To my ear, at least.
February 15, 2025 at 19:08
So coffee should be a schedule 1 drug, in your opinion?
February 15, 2025 at 19:07
I don't think that. Never have, never will.
February 15, 2025 at 18:57
But is it false?
February 15, 2025 at 18:56
Well, technically speaking, it is. And this is news to you, in some way?
February 15, 2025 at 18:55
That's an opinion, not a fact.
February 15, 2025 at 18:53
If you say so.
February 15, 2025 at 18:53
The Universe has always existed. That is True.
February 15, 2025 at 18:50
Sure. See
February 15, 2025 at 18:49
The Universe.
February 15, 2025 at 18:44
Sounds like London-ish thing to say, I suppose.
February 15, 2025 at 18:43
So it always existed.
February 15, 2025 at 18:43
Yes, it is, because what makes it a fuel is the efficient causation of the burning.
February 15, 2025 at 18:39
Like when you oxygenate a fire.
February 15, 2025 at 18:39
There is only efficient causation. There is no formal causation, There is no material causation, And there is no finalistic causation either. The only...
February 15, 2025 at 18:37
Yeah, that's impractical for the purposes of scheduling drugs in the context of the FDA.
February 15, 2025 at 18:36