You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Arcane Sandwich

Comments

It is.
February 15, 2025 at 23:41
It's never to late to be Edge. Not as in Edge Lords, but in the Syracuse (New York) sense of it.
February 15, 2025 at 23:40
You arguably should be. At least one, if not all three.
February 15, 2025 at 23:39
Hey, pilots use it. That's arguably a legit use of an illegal substance.
February 15, 2025 at 23:38
So, in your view, "End of story, really." is a legit thing to say, but "End of History" somehow is not?
February 15, 2025 at 23:32
There's a Thread that I started about the alignment chart in D&D, maybe we can talk there, about this issue. Perhaps we may continue this conversation...
February 15, 2025 at 23:30
No problem, happy to help :up: Here's more information about the references: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draconomicon
February 15, 2025 at 21:53
All of that is in the references that I told you.
February 15, 2025 at 21:51
If you want to know more about them, I just gave you two references.
February 15, 2025 at 21:47
All of your questions have their corresponding answers in the 2nd and 3rd Editions of the Draconomicon.
February 15, 2025 at 21:46
Yes, that one in particular is worse than the oil slick.
February 15, 2025 at 21:44
Sugar should be a schedule 1 drug. Please contribute to my Thread, it's in the Lounge. Nevermind.
February 15, 2025 at 21:41
Those aren't pigs. They're piglets.
February 15, 2025 at 21:36
Very interesting.
February 15, 2025 at 21:34
In: E = mc²  — view comment
Nonsense.
February 15, 2025 at 21:31
Hegel's Mind is dead. Mine is not. Therefore: My own mind > Hegel's Mind.
February 15, 2025 at 21:27
Mine does not. My own mind > Hegel's Mind.
February 15, 2025 at 21:26
I don't like the sound of that.
February 15, 2025 at 21:26
MoK a Dragon, what do you expect?
February 15, 2025 at 20:57
Doesn't matter. Carry on.
February 15, 2025 at 20:35
Cool. Glad to have you here. Thanks. Hmmm, well for the topic of this Thread specifically, I think that the paradigmatic example for this discussion i...
February 15, 2025 at 20:35
What are your thoughts on Emerson's Transcendentalism? What are your thoughts on Peirce's Reasonableness? What do you think of Materialism?
February 15, 2025 at 20:22
Spoken like a True Australian. For your Nuclear Power Plants of The Future?
February 15, 2025 at 20:20
But I stopped. So, I complied with his request.
February 15, 2025 at 20:18
That sounds like quackery.
February 15, 2025 at 20:07
If anyone would like to help me with my science project, then please provide your honest answers to the following list of questions: (1) Can I turn Ch...
February 15, 2025 at 19:59
According to who? Nothing wrong with that. No, don't let it alone. It's an important problem in contemporary metaphysics. Then here's my proposal, old...
February 15, 2025 at 19:49
No, I don't want any of this, that's neither benevolence nor malevolence, it's either neutral morality ("neutrevalence", or "neutral balance", if you ...
February 15, 2025 at 19:42
Yes it can, have you ever played Dungeons & Dragons? I'm :100: confident that I can create not one, but three types of Evil A.I.s, like so: AI1 = Lawf...
February 15, 2025 at 19:41
I don't. I agree with the last part, I don't agree with the first part.
February 15, 2025 at 19:36
May I chime in? Here's the thing, people. It's much simpler than what all of you are saying. A good regulator = a good unofficial moderator. As such, ...
February 15, 2025 at 19:33
Coffee is dangerous, but I propose we move this discussion over to the relevant Thread that I just started for this specific Topic, please.
February 15, 2025 at 19:21
Ok, I'll do that in a second. Give me a minute so that I can start the Thread, it will go in the Lounge. Then I'll edit this comment with the link. Ye...
February 15, 2025 at 19:11
Maybe = modal operator for "maybe".
February 15, 2025 at 19:09
I'm not sure. Maybe. You seem to have some sort of point, but it's a bit unclear. To my ear, at least.
February 15, 2025 at 19:08
So coffee should be a schedule 1 drug, in your opinion?
February 15, 2025 at 19:07
I don't think that. Never have, never will.
February 15, 2025 at 18:57
But is it false?
February 15, 2025 at 18:56
Well, technically speaking, it is. And this is news to you, in some way?
February 15, 2025 at 18:55
That's an opinion, not a fact.
February 15, 2025 at 18:53
If you say so.
February 15, 2025 at 18:53
The Universe has always existed. That is True.
February 15, 2025 at 18:50
Sure. See
February 15, 2025 at 18:49
The Universe.
February 15, 2025 at 18:44
Sounds like London-ish thing to say, I suppose.
February 15, 2025 at 18:43
So it always existed.
February 15, 2025 at 18:43
Yes, it is, because what makes it a fuel is the efficient causation of the burning.
February 15, 2025 at 18:39
Like when you oxygenate a fire.
February 15, 2025 at 18:39
There is only efficient causation. There is no formal causation, There is no material causation, And there is no finalistic causation either. The only...
February 15, 2025 at 18:37
Yeah, that's impractical for the purposes of scheduling drugs in the context of the FDA.
February 15, 2025 at 18:36