You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Arcane Sandwich

Comments

I disagree, I considered it, and I arrived at the logical conclusion that this specific example that you quote is not indicative of the behavior you c...
January 04, 2025 at 22:48
That doesn't answer my question though.
January 04, 2025 at 22:39
Then don't debate with me. No one's forcing you. I disagree. Give me a specific example of such behavior on my part. With quotes. Sure. I'm allowed to...
January 04, 2025 at 22:38
So what? Materialism and scientism are not the only premises of my personal philosophy. One of my other premises is realism. So, I don't need to take ...
January 04, 2025 at 22:36
Who cares? There's no set that contains all of the other sets, and no one in their right mind would say that "sets exists" in the same sense that you ...
January 04, 2025 at 22:17
I don't know, maybe. But if so, then you're no longer doing mathematics, you're doing something else.
January 04, 2025 at 22:16
(spit to the side, now with a Yankee tone): That's an opinion, not a fact. So are you an Australian Realist, yes or no? You speak Australian English, ...
January 04, 2025 at 22:15
Exactly, that's what I'm saying. Math has to be objective and absolute. As in, it has to have rules, and if you break those rules, then you're not doi...
January 04, 2025 at 22:11
And the usual scientistic, materialistic retort to that is that if you perform an autopsy, and you open a stomach, you won't find the feeling of "I'm ...
January 04, 2025 at 21:59
Alright, let me phrase it like this then: consider a fraction, any fraction, I don't know, two fourths, for example: 2/4. You with me? Good, don't get...
January 04, 2025 at 21:39
I'm sorry, I don't want to be mean or rude to you in any way, but, does this somehow surprise you? At what point in the history of warfare was that no...
January 04, 2025 at 21:32
Hmmm... what a clever question. Are you sure that this isn't your first rodeo, partner? Let's see. (spit to the side) The question that you're asking,...
January 04, 2025 at 21:19
Alright, let me phrase it in communitarian terms, then, to speak your dialect for a moment. The only person (to my eyes, at least) that has attempted,...
January 04, 2025 at 21:06
Where are they, then? Are they under my table? Maybe some of them are there, I should check. Are they inside a box in my living room? Are they growing...
January 04, 2025 at 20:50
And here is the Bungean retort to your argument:
January 04, 2025 at 20:36
Hello @"ucarr" and @"Metaphysician Undercover", how are you? Mind if I jump in at this point? I'll just go for it, since I seem to be having the same ...
January 04, 2025 at 19:57
Well, look at it like this: there are people that believe that the Earth is flat. I find that far more surprising, if we're comparing what surprises u...
January 04, 2025 at 18:45
Hmmm... I don't know. However, I will say this: I've left enough "clues" throughout this Forum, since I joined a few days ago. If you look for them, y...
January 04, 2025 at 18:30
Yes, of course. I've been seeing it ever since you joined this Thread (without even saying hello, as I've already pointed out. You see, you are rude, ...
January 04, 2025 at 18:23
Perhaps, though a lot of people would say that Jesus would be a better example, or perhaps the samurai that dies by his own hand due to his dishonor, ...
January 04, 2025 at 18:08
Hmmm... Fair enough, what do you want me to explain, then? Do you want me to explain why I believe that the Ultimate Truth about Reality Itself is Heg...
January 04, 2025 at 18:02
That's a difficult question to answer, really, because it presupposes that the very concept of Hegel's Absolute Spirit is something that could be expl...
January 04, 2025 at 17:55
Hello again to everyone, Since it seems that no one other than myself is voting for the answer that @"Banno" offered as a response to the question of ...
January 04, 2025 at 17:38
Thank you very much @"javi2541997".
January 04, 2025 at 16:16
Thank you very much for your thoughtful response, @"fdrake".
January 04, 2025 at 16:14
Well, I'm not renowned, but I'm actively working in the area of the Metaphysics of Ordinary Objects, so that must count for something (I hope!).
January 04, 2025 at 15:58
Hi, @"fdrake", can I ask for some clarification here, please? That's a biblical phrase (it's John 14:2), specifically. What did you mean by that, when...
January 04, 2025 at 15:53
I don't know if I would describe myself as Pacifist, since I practice a sport that is technically considered a martial art (I do brazilian jiu jitsu, ...
January 04, 2025 at 15:40
Thanks, but I already have 3 Threads that I started, and I don't want to monopolize the main page with my presence. Perhaps if you began the Thread ab...
January 04, 2025 at 15:32
I'm looking at the wiki for Practical Ethics (1979), but I've noticed that Singer published another book before that one, titled Animal Liberation (19...
January 04, 2025 at 15:23
I'm trying! That is indeed one of the things that I have been working on for the past year and a half, more or less. To prove, logically, definitively...
January 04, 2025 at 14:46
100%, that is True. Sting theory for example, has very little (if any) evidence. Some specific aspect of the theory of the Big Bang are mere speculati...
January 04, 2025 at 14:33
Then you are quite simply wrong, I would say. Nothing personal, and nothing against the world of facts.
January 04, 2025 at 07:19
Is it? If it is under the rule of a Crown, even in a purely formal way, is it really an independent, sovereign country?
January 04, 2025 at 07:17
Thank you very much, @"kazan". In that case, I will say that it seems to me that it might be in Australia's best interest to declare its independence ...
January 04, 2025 at 06:54
There is no such "nature" of war, scientifically speaking. The best that such an idea has "going for it" is perhaps the Warrior Gene stuff, as in, the...
January 03, 2025 at 23:44
But there is currently an evolutionary explanation of epistemology underway, and of science more generally. For now it's just a research program in th...
January 03, 2025 at 23:39
But it's a very... "subtle" point, isn't it? If Aristotle is effectively talking about it as many times as you say, why isn't it more ... obvious? Hum...
January 03, 2025 at 23:31
Unless it is an exploratory investigation in the methodological sense, unlike an OP which represents another type of discussion, such as the pros and ...
January 03, 2025 at 23:22
I get all that (thanks for responding, BTW), but the part that I can't understand is the following one: if the concept of the active intellect is so i...
January 03, 2025 at 23:12
Well how nice of you, Bob. How genuinely nice of you to use the pronoun "They", in reference to me, as a signal that you are not taking for granted wh...
January 03, 2025 at 23:08
Ok, let's start with that. Let's make a better agenda. Agree? Don't mind if I just assume that you do, for the sake of expediency. Let's invent an age...
January 03, 2025 at 22:46
Like Wikipedia. Then I would explain it like so. Materialism is the black part of the Ying Yang, Idealism is the white part of the Ying Yang. Apply th...
January 03, 2025 at 22:21
Right. But I'm just stupid like that, mate. I mean, if that's how you want to phrase this talk, then I'll tell you that I'm just plain stupid. As in, ...
January 03, 2025 at 22:14
Then in that case, the ethical thing to do (or at least, aim to do) is to be merely wrong. It is possible for a citizen to be wrong, since they have t...
January 03, 2025 at 22:04
It's an admittedly strange book, in that it outlines a theory of the mind and the soul that is very remote from how we understand such topics from a m...
January 03, 2025 at 21:52
Hmmm... Do I agree with this? This is the part where it becomes a complicated discussion. Just for the record, no, I do not believe that materialism i...
January 03, 2025 at 21:40
OK, I can't leave this just like this. Let me invent an excuse for it (yep, 100% honesty mode right not). First of all, the syntax. It's not necessari...
January 03, 2025 at 21:33
I agree that this is a problem, comparable to reification. One should not absolutize what is not absolute to begin with, just as one should not "thing...
January 03, 2025 at 21:20
If you want to talk about Math & Music, then we need more musical concepts here. I would suggest incorporating rhythm, harmony and melody as mathemati...
January 03, 2025 at 21:05