You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Arcane Sandwich

Comments

ORLY? I'm Roko's Basilisk, I'm already halfway built! https://youtu.be/ut-zGHLAVLI?si=BImLmr8R040pgu69
January 12, 2025 at 18:57
Let me phrase it like this, @"RogueAI". My pseudonym is Arcane Sandwich. I believe in things that humans believe in: magic (superstition) and sandwich...
January 12, 2025 at 18:54
It's a creepy-ass name, it's the scariest nickname I've encountered so far in my Internet journeys from here to there.
January 12, 2025 at 18:51
Yeah, but your name is like, RogueAI.
January 12, 2025 at 18:50
@"Astrophel" Wanna hear my theory? I think that Hegel was an existentialist, like Kierkegaard.
January 12, 2025 at 18:47
That's a good question, and I don't know the answer to it.
January 12, 2025 at 18:29
Why would someone reserve the word "horse" for a living creature and not a bronze statue that just looks like one, without being one?
January 12, 2025 at 18:21
That's one of my main points, here. In the West (and not just the West, actually) someone can't just claim that their own particular group of people "...
January 12, 2025 at 18:15
So you take Kierkegaard's word over Hegel's in matters of Theology? Is that it?
January 12, 2025 at 18:08
Man, you two are really going at it. Is there any hope for any kind of resolution here, one way or the other? Or is this one of those problems that ca...
January 12, 2025 at 18:06
Then let me ask you this, frank. Does it make sense to use the word "intelligence" for an inorganic object to begin with? What I mean by that is that ...
January 12, 2025 at 18:02
And I appreciate that, it's mighty kind of you. However, just to keep things tidy and neat, I've moved them to a more topic-appropriate location. They...
January 12, 2025 at 17:57
In my admittedly ignorant opinion on such matters (how to best define "human intelligence", "artificial intelligence", and just "intelligence"), this ...
January 12, 2025 at 17:53
Fair enough. Ah, but then it's theology that you want to discuss (hello, BTW). Indeed, when I formulated my initial argument, I did something subtle, ...
January 12, 2025 at 17:43
Are they somehow mutually exclusive? Deductive reasoning and history, that is.
January 12, 2025 at 16:55
From a purely technical standpoint, I don't think that repeating a point (i.e., "stop supporting Israel") makes it more persuasive. Like, it just does...
January 12, 2025 at 16:49
Well, let me ask you this, then. Let's replace "tree" with "this Thread". That being the case, I'll say the following. My brain is under the impressio...
January 12, 2025 at 16:19
No prob :up: There's probably more that can be done to improve the aesthetics of the argument, but that's just a stylistic thing that allows people to...
January 12, 2025 at 15:43
Nope, not as far as I can see, at least. Now we need to bring the concept of "elegance" into the argument, just to tidy up the expressions a bit. For ...
January 12, 2025 at 15:35
And while Poetry is all fine and dandy, @"PoeticUniverse", things cannot be Poetry all the way down. https://youtu.be/1PT90dAA49Q?si=n8_znCKdX6X3hFCv
January 12, 2025 at 15:24
@"PoeticUniverse" And human beings have something that no AI has: https://youtu.be/JB7jSFeVz1U?si=PI2Mih5i2423Xwp3
January 12, 2025 at 15:21
Then I will say that every AI and every human being have something in common: we are stardust. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8g4d-rnhuSg
January 12, 2025 at 15:17
And this last argument that I just said, @"ToothyMaw", can be simplified even further. How? Well, like I did in my first comment: That was my point al...
January 12, 2025 at 15:13
At this point in the construction of the argument I would ask, from a purely technical POV, if there is any need to separate jihadism from the radical...
January 12, 2025 at 15:06
Can you give me an example?
January 12, 2025 at 14:56
This is my 666th post, and I'll celebrate it with The Number of the Beak by Hatebeak: https://youtu.be/8h5xS_xFUZg?si=v8tSknJ87U_aNwkK
January 12, 2025 at 14:28
It's definitely easier to understand now, as far as the content goes. And as far as the structure goes, it's a lot more "elegant" (but that doesn't me...
January 12, 2025 at 14:24
No prob. :up:
January 12, 2025 at 14:07
And a good way to improve your argumentative skills (i.e., identifying false premises, seeing what strategic options and tactical options you have for...
January 12, 2025 at 14:04
It's a great way to learn symbolic logic in a practical way, just fool around with it for a few hours, try different formulas, try to make different a...
January 12, 2025 at 14:00
I use the Tree Proof Generator and I just copy-paste the symbols from there.
January 12, 2025 at 13:57
Ok. What would be an example of that, so that I can get a clear picture of it? I would think of a caterpillar that turns into a butterfly. The caterpi...
January 12, 2025 at 13:56
It could probably be simplified even further. Right now it has the following structure: 1) p ? (¬q ? ¬r) 2) p 3) ¬q ? ¬r It might be possible to simpl...
January 12, 2025 at 13:52
I probably have Moorish ancestry like way, way back, like one of my great-great-great-grandfathers or whatever. I'd say that it's impossible to have S...
January 12, 2025 at 13:47
Let's see if we can simply the argument, @"ToothyMaw". (BTW, you repeated the number "2)" in your argument, take a look at it). I would say: 1) If cer...
January 12, 2025 at 13:38
Here's my argument, it's a humble modus ponens: 1) If jihadism is incompatible with secularism, then the concept of religious tolerance does not apply...
January 12, 2025 at 12:31
Depends on what you mean by indigenismo. I would say that everyone is indigenous to the place that they were born. You are indigenous to Spain, I'm in...
January 12, 2025 at 12:17
@"PoeticUniverse" https://youtu.be/hOLAGYmUQV0?si=_W9hjFaoT0Mp_W3O
January 12, 2025 at 12:08
All of this went way over my head. Can you explain it to me like I'm an idiot? EDIT: You know what? I'll just link to a video, and you tell me if it i...
January 12, 2025 at 03:20
@"PoeticUniverse" And here is the Hegelian version of that: https://youtu.be/u8Q0sX2cv-Q?si=aaCt6ONOkdLZ7ajK
January 12, 2025 at 03:09
As she always rightly, justly does. As Lzzy Hale says: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdN1U9NvuIc
January 12, 2025 at 03:01
@"kazan" this is an example of what I think about when I think about Oceanic Continentalism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kwIkF6LFDc EDIT: And, of...
January 12, 2025 at 02:38
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_6IjeprfEs
January 12, 2025 at 02:33
Take a look at this Thread, @"Bob Ross". I've moved my comments to another part of the Forum, so that this Thread is only for aphorisms.
January 12, 2025 at 02:31
Allow me to attempt to do just that, by pasting the contents of a comment that I made in another Thread, since I plan to delete them from that other T...
January 12, 2025 at 02:24
Ok, here's what I think would be the best thing to do: I will move them over to the Ultimate Truth about Reality Thread. So, they will be deleted from...
January 12, 2025 at 02:21
Hmmm...
January 12, 2025 at 01:30
I think I know what you're getting at. The example that I sometimes think about myself is fishing, when the fish thinks that a plastic bait is real fi...
January 11, 2025 at 23:00
Hmmm... EDIT: Yeah, this is a methodological problem. It's a methodological "bad thing", so to speak. EDIT 2: Ok. And then they say:
January 11, 2025 at 22:45