You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Arcane Sandwich

Comments

Why not? What false premises do they contain, if they are not sound?
January 17, 2025 at 06:41
But it has an impressive history.
January 17, 2025 at 05:31
Here is the Tao that can be told, and it shows the eternal Tao (the Tao that cannot be told) https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/Yin_a...
January 17, 2025 at 05:26
Who says that it's just poetry? It can be science instead. Be cooperative, instead of intentionally trying to cause a disturbance in this Thread. I am...
January 17, 2025 at 05:07
Are you sure about that? It sounds to me that one can speak "around" it, one can allude to it, indirectly. Because it reveals itself to you, in a non-...
January 17, 2025 at 04:51
Tao = The Way Yes, they have. Yes, I agree. Yes, we have. Indeed. Good to see that we're on the same page, you and I. So to speak, of course.
January 17, 2025 at 04:36
Hmmm... Nature = "what is natural". From the following: 1) Tao = great. 2) If Tao = Nature, then: 3) Nature = great. However, 4) "The Tao that can be ...
January 17, 2025 at 04:32
@"Wayfarer", @"T Clark", what does the following phrase mean: "The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao." It's the exact same words in the two ...
January 17, 2025 at 04:24
Hmmm... Ok, I will cite another English version of chapter 25, because it is the best that I can do, under these circumstances, which I cannot transce...
January 17, 2025 at 04:04
Please explain the following song from the POV of your Theory about the Universe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fabi8nyjsYc
January 17, 2025 at 03:23
Ok. No one cares, except for Grammar Nazis. Your point was understood despite your grammatical mistake.
January 17, 2025 at 03:08
Understood. Thank you very much then, it seems that I have made a mistake in attributing authorship to Jane English.
January 17, 2025 at 02:30
No one is arguing the contrary. You're accusing me of something, and I don't even know what you're accusing me of, to begin with. But it doesn't matte...
January 17, 2025 at 02:29
Here's a recent metal band that I think is quite good, they have that jazzy, avant-garde thing going on, like a few bands before them (think Atheist, ...
January 17, 2025 at 01:32
Or on the payroll of a multi-national corporation.
January 17, 2025 at 01:09
@"T Clark" please state your opinion on Chapter 25 of the Tao Te Ching of the Jane English version.
January 17, 2025 at 01:07
I believe that is because we, the public, are also trying to think through this problem under complicated conditions, because we don't have all of the...
January 17, 2025 at 01:02
No one has. Indeed. Think of that, this way: everyone involved in that problem is operating with partial information. No actor there has complete info...
January 17, 2025 at 00:55
Perhaps the following people (to answer my own question): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvYRYCIAKZo EDIT: And here are the lyrics to that:
January 17, 2025 at 00:39
@"Bob Ross" why are you even advancing a new "Thomistic" argument, if Thomas Aquinas himself already advanced five? So what if they're meant for the l...
January 17, 2025 at 00:35
Yes, it is. Chinese culture is a Warrior culture to the core. We cannot understand it because, in that sense, we are barbarians compared to them. The ...
January 17, 2025 at 00:21
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTayLS2rWMs EDIT: EDIT 2: EDIT 3: Who is to say that the King is not instead Haile Selassie, Emperor of Ethiopia, the ...
January 16, 2025 at 23:57
The Primitive Customs of the Hummingbird Our Father, the Absolute First created himself from the primordial darkness. He created the divine soles of h...
January 16, 2025 at 23:53
And how are we, here, different from laymen? One does not cease to be a layman when one philosophizes, as much as one would like to believe the contra...
January 16, 2025 at 23:48
January 16, 2025 at 23:41
They don't like me. They translated one of my papers on Meillassoux and Badiou, and they laughed at what I said. And what's even worse is that they sa...
January 16, 2025 at 23:22
@"Wayfarer" what do you think of this ?
January 16, 2025 at 23:15
Yes, I'm familiar with his work, I had to study it at the Uni, it was part of the curricula. I don't agree with Eliade's views. I'm more sympathetic t...
January 16, 2025 at 23:12
The King is one of them. Who is to say that the King is not the Great Chinggis Khaan? Knees be knelt and heads be bowed, if the Great (Tao) Chinggis K...
January 16, 2025 at 23:08
How would you explain this part, specifically, to an English audience?
January 16, 2025 at 23:05
I agree, 100%. I tend to associate this passage with what Hesiod says in his Theogony about Xaos (Chaos). I also relate it to the Primitive Customs of...
January 16, 2025 at 23:02
Is it? Perhaps it is the real world instead. Perhaps Nature is Reality Itself. Tao (Greatness) is simply a manifestation of Nature. The preceding vers...
January 16, 2025 at 22:58
Well, look at it from a methodological POV: if you have no substances in your ontology, what element is doing the work that the classical substances a...
January 16, 2025 at 22:45
Bob, I say this with no disrespect, I don't even understand what's Thomistic about your argument to begin with. Thomas Aquinas famously stated five ar...
January 16, 2025 at 22:39
I can respect that. You disagree with substances on a conceptual level, because they have no methodological role to play in your ontology. In other wo...
January 16, 2025 at 22:35
@"Wayfarer" you are formally and officially invited to state your opinion on such matters. As everyone is. EDIT: @"Moliere" this might interest you, g...
January 16, 2025 at 22:25
Being Tao, Greatness itself flows It flows far away. Having gone far, Greatness itself returns. EDIT: The audiovisual material for this comment is the...
January 16, 2025 at 22:23
You can do what I do: just accept substances. It's like, you're not going to turn into a fascist just because you have a concept of substance in your ...
January 16, 2025 at 22:08
Sounds like a smart thing to say. I'm not sure that I agree with it, but OK. But the point of Moore's argument is that he has two hands. Solipsism say...
January 16, 2025 at 22:03
Exactly. No, it does not. Unless, of course, you wish to distinguish conceptual existence from real existence, and to treat each as a different first-...
January 16, 2025 at 21:36
But these problems are not exclusive to Object-Oriented Ontology, they also arise in the analytic metaphysics of Ordinary Objects. And they also arise...
January 16, 2025 at 21:31
Yes, it does.
January 16, 2025 at 21:18
Congratulations, Captain Obvious. So your point is, what, exactly? Congratulations once again, Captain Obvious. So your point is, what, exactly?
January 16, 2025 at 21:13
The word "scientism" originally had a negative connotation, and then some people (like Mario Bunge) started using it in a positive sense. For example,...
January 16, 2025 at 21:10
Kant also predates Ralph Waldo Emerson, whose Transcendentalism is far beyond anything that Kant could ever dream. The way I see it, a Kantian thing-i...
January 16, 2025 at 20:59
Did you read Eco's Kant and the Platypus? I think that Eco says nonsense sometimes. Terminator 2, essentially. Skynet, and all that. Ok, so who is Sar...
January 16, 2025 at 20:37
If I were to phrase my argument differently, I would ask @"Bob Ross" the following questions: do you really need 40 odd premises to begin with? It's n...
January 16, 2025 at 20:26
I agree, which is why I said this: A simple syllogism that aims to prove that God exists is much, much more difficult to formulate than an argument th...
January 16, 2025 at 20:18
My sentiments on Harman's philosophy (and he knows this himself, since we've been exchanging emails for almost 10 years now) are mixed, precisely beca...
January 16, 2025 at 20:13
And I'm using real-world counter-examples to prove that they don't. Numbers are fictions, and no fictions have causal efficacy. If you want to say tha...
January 16, 2025 at 20:05