MoK

I agree partly. If those words were said by Jesus before His death then Jesus and God are not one. Whether the doctrine of the Trinity is logically co...

Thank you very much for your time as well my friend. It was a pleasure to discuss things with you.

It is not a hidden premise. I already mentioned it in OP. I already changed the argument. Please find it in the following and let me know what you thi...

I guess that you are referring to the argument of change for God from Aquinas. I think there is a jump in his argument when he refers unmoved mover as...

If those words were the last words that Jesus said then yes, Jesus and God are not one. No, I cannot. The concept of Christian God has been the subjec...

You know, my friend, you don't have a coherent view and don't want to accept that it is incoherent. So, there is nothing I can do to help you. So, let...

So, do you agree with such a statement? If yes, then a person with locked-in syndrome has the right to terminate his life. Now, you are saying the opp...

Thank you very much for your support. I learned from you how to write an argument in such a format. As I mentioned in OP, I assume that P1 is true and...

I spent several hours working on the argument. I changed P1 slightly and discarded P2, C1, and P3 because I no longer needed them. And here is the new...

The point is you kill a human being even though you think it is objectively wrong. Call it self-defense or whatever. That does not resolve the issue.

It is alright to change your mind. Let's say that we disagree on the topic.

No, as I mentioned, the persons of the Trinity are different from God's essence. I already cited an article on the topic if you are interested in read...

I think we first must distinguish between subjective time and objective time. We perceive subjective time rather than objective one. The subjective ti...

As I mentioned in OP, in this thread I am not interested in discussing whether P1 is true or false. I assume it is true and see what it leads to. God ...

My point, as you noticed, is that the act of creation requires a decision so God has to change to create. Here, I am not going to discuss the Christia...

Thank you very much for investing the time and effort to change my version of the argument to yours. I think that is a great step since you refined th...

Disturbed is my only favorite heavy metal band and Down with the Sickness is one of my favorite songs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09LTT0xwdfw

There is no ought when we deal with subjective morality. You are basically in a situation that is defined by the four factors. You weigh factors and t...

Are you a Christian? There is no cure available for it. It is interesting to see that at one point you say that it is his life and he has the right to...

You don't wait for legal authority to allow you to kill the psychopath. Do you? You said you would kill him as a matter of self-defense. I then ask ho...

Ok, let's see what is my domain of discourse. The concepts that I am dealing with are God, the creation, the act of creation, the situation before the...

Ok, thanks. Thanks but don't worry about my time. I am a retired person so I have plenty of time. I however have several interests so I have to manage...

No, that in my opinion does not follow at all. Anyhow, I changed the argument to remove the problems and ambiguities. Please find the new argument in ...

Thanks for the elaboration. I see what you mean. What does "A" mean here? Does "Ag" mean that God is the creator? If yes, I think it is useful to keep...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BboMpayJomw

Ok, I see.

Isn't YHWH a name of God?

Thank you very much for your note.

Thank you very much for your post. It refreshed my memory of things I read a long time ago, almost ten years ago, if not longer. I read your post once...

Thank you very much for your interest and offering to help me write the argument in first-order predicate logic. I am not a logician, so I need your h...

Yes, that means that God exists in time. Any change requires time. I have an argument for that. It is off-topic and I wanted to discuss it in another ...

MoK and John have the same essence by this I mean they both are made of matter. They however have different properties so they are different.

It is a moral issue if you accept that killing a human is wrong. By the way, how come torturing a terrorist who put a bomb in a location is wrong cons...

You can read about locked-in syndrome here. It is a term that refer to cases in which people with this syndrome are locked-in within their body and ca...

I think four factors construct any situation when a decision is required. These factors are feelings, beliefs, opinions, and interests. We most of the...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeMFqkcPYcg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UHDw7D_CPU

You don't know what a locked-in syndrome is. Do you?

It is in fact very rational statement. You are not happy with this example, let me give you another example: You face a psychopath who is willing to k...

How are you going to assist him if killing is wrong to you? He can decide about his life but he cannot execute the decision so he is very dependent on...

It may, but the fact that it may gives us the right to torture the terrorist.

Didn't you say that a person with locked-in syndrome has the right to terminate his life?

I cannot find a flaw in his argument. Could you? I am not saying that I agree with his metaphysics though but that is a different topic.

Let's assume it does.

So you disagree with your own statement?

As I mentioned Aquinas distinguish between persons and essence.

Let's assume that we tried all other approaches. Let's assume so for the sake of argument.

And I already mentioned that you cannot have a situation without considering these factors. According to Kant killing a human is not allowed in all ci...

:up:

According to Kant, killing, torturing, etc. are objectively wrong by this he means that these actions are not allowed under any circumstances. There i...