MoK

I know enough about the philosophy of the mind and I don't need to read another book on the topic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuooKF-IZaE&list=PLuwZYJQHtE4RwHTmXxfR633coHg1jCI3h

Software is nothing but an arrangement of bytes of memory in a hardware. So it is not a thing by itself. So to you, the mind is an arrangement of phys...

The doubt is special as I argued. I have been working and reading on the philosophy of the mind for several years. Well, it seems to me that is an end...

No. How do you distinguish between the mind and the brain? What is your definition of the mind?

The Mind is not the brain. The brain is physical, by physical I mean it is a sort of substance. Accepting that the brain and the mind are the same one...

It is special. If we accept the mental phenomenon of doubt, we can conclude that options are real. Yes, brain states are subject to change and are det...

I am saying two things here: 1) Accepting that experience is an emergent property then we deal with epiphenomenalism and 2) Experience is not a substa...

What is non sequiturs here?

Yes, I am aware of the emergence concept. Accepting that experience is an emergent property leads to epiphenomenalism in which experience does not hav...

Here is the argument from Change for God by Aquinas: 1. Some things in the world change. 2. Everything that changes is caused to do so. 3. Nothing is ...

I already change the argument to include your objection: P1) God exists and is the creator of the creation from nothing P2) If so, then there is a sit...

I am saying that experience is due to physical. Physical is a substance, like the brain, without it experience is not possible.

I am not talking about the abstract objects here. I am talking about experience. Are you denying that you experience and your experience is not subjec...

What do you mean?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSx1-XFrIk0

How that could be done without the Mind? The physical cannot possibly understand what goes into the experience. Experience is due to matter and change...

Maybe!

Probably! Who knows!?

I am talking about mental state doubt.

Ok, and thanks.

Oh, I see.

Ok, and thanks.

What is art to Hegel? What is religion to Hegel? What is philosophy to Hegel?

Thanks for your input. It is now necessary that I read more on Hegel.

I only lie when my life is in danger! :) A promise to you and myself. Thanks for introducing Hegel to me.

Because I have a physical body and I also have experience. I am not saying that all changes are due to experience since there could be a type of physi...

Here, I am arguing in favor of new substance dualism. Both materialism and idealism are sort of monism. I don't think that materialism is true because...

I don't understand what you mean here. Do you mind elaborating?

Thanks for your input. I was not aware of this. I will read more on Hegel when I have time.

Thanks for your confirmation.

Oh, I didn't know that!

It is correct given the definition of doubt.

If we accept that God exists for the sake of argument then God is either the result of evolution or He simply exists as an Omniscient, Omnipresent, an...

Thanks for supporting the site for all these years!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSvFpBOe8eY

There are arguments for the uncaused cause, such as Aquinas's argument from change. However, he mixes the concept of God, the creator of creation from...

There are arguments for the existence of God. For example, the argument from motion by Aquinas: 1. Some things in the world change. 2. Everything that...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twG46K1wbLQ

I am not a philosopher by a physicist by training so I need the help of other philosophers to refine my ideas and make them concrete. Thank you very m...

OK, thanks.

Doubts are not allowed in a deterministic world. Everything is certain in a deterministic world since by definition determinism refers to a worldview ...

Well, I think my understanding of His work is not complete as I only spent a few hours reading the article that I cited. In this article, it is mentio...

As I said, you are not interested in discussing the OP. That is all right to me. Other philosophers in this forum are interested in the topic though. ...

Please correct me if I am wrong, so according to Hegel, the subject refers to self-consciousness and self-knowledge of a being.

I see and thanks for your post.

I thought you were interested in discussing the OP. It seems you are not. So the end of the discussion.

It is not irrational. To focus on an argument we have to limit the scope of discussion, otherwise, we don't get anywhere.

What do you think of the argument in OP? Here is the final form of the argument: P1) God exists and is the creator of the creation from nothing P2) If...

That is not how I defined a substance. I don't believe that God is made of matter; otherwise, God would be visible to us. That also applies to spiritu...