It depends on the model you use. In the standard model, most of the energies related to the forces are dynamic while the rest mass energy is not. In t...
Good and evil are fundamental features of our reality and are both necessary. Morality is about what is right or wrong to do in a situation. Everythin...
You already mentioned what you mean with coherence and I mentioned that that is not what I mean by coherence. Well, I already defined and gave example...
Huh? Why don't you ask people for help? Why don't you open a thread on "our experiences are incoherent"? We have been through this in this thread and ...
The fundamental entities from which time emerges are either dynamic or static. In the first case, we are dealing with my argument. In the second case,...
Time is the fundamental variable of any physical theory therefore time cannot be an emergent property of such a physical theory since time cannot be t...
I mean if X, my cup of tea has a location, is the case that only X is the case and Y, Z, etc. which refer to my cup of tea having other locations are ...
I don't think that I am distorting the facts. People apparently understand what I mean by the coherence in the experience so I don't think that I am u...
I didn't intend to argue for the brain in this thread since that is the third substance and I don't have any argument for it now. I just commented on ...
No, I don't mean that. You are the only person who is trapped in P1. Other people understood P1 and asked other questions. To be honest I don't know h...
By coherent I mean that our experiences when we are awake are consistent. Take the example of my experience of the cup of tea. It is where I expect it...
I already defined the substance in several posts. By substance, I mean something that exists and has a set of properties or abilities. The bundle theo...
My argument has two parts: 1) In the first part I argue in favor of the object that carries information and is coherent from the experience and 2) In ...
To me, the mind is the substance with the ability to experience and cause the object only. The mind has the ability to freely decide as well when it f...
Personal experience can be a solid ground to conclude that the experience is coherent. Our experiences when we are dreaming are mostly incoherent whil...
I don't have an argument against solipsism and I am not endorsing it either. I have faith that other beings exist though. All I am saying is that we o...
The physical just has existed since the beginning of time. It is absurd to ask what was before the beginning of time hence it is also absurd to ask wh...
The private experience is an objective ground for coherence. We don't have any other tools except our private experience anyway! Can you give me an ex...
None of these. Something is coherent when it is consistent. I don't need to prove it. It is a brute fact. But beliefs and thoughts could be incoherent...
I didn't say that the experience is tabula rasa. The experience has a texture and is the result of the mind perceiving the object. The object has a se...
Correct. I however wonder how through existential generalization one can conclude the existence of the object from the experience. This is the first t...
A substance is something that exists and has a set of properties or abilities. We have at least three substances in the case of the person, namely the...
By the object, I don't mean a mental thing but something physical that exists and has a set of properties. There are indeed two substances (apart from...
It makes perfect sense. I am not talking about people's beliefs and thoughts. I am not talking about dreams here but our experiences when awake. Dream...
A substance is something that exists and has a set of properties or abilities. The physical substance has a shape, location, etc. as its properties. T...
No, the physical substance is another category, such as my body, a cup of tea, etc. so to summarize we have at least three substances, the mind, the o...
I already elaborated on the coherence in reality when I discussed my cup of tea here. My body is a substance, it is a physical substance. There are tw...
Up to here, I introduce two substances, namely the mind, and object. The mind is a substance with the ability to experience and cause the object where...
I think we have three substances when it comes to a person, namely the brain, the object, and the mind. The object has a set of properties so-called Q...
Thank you very much for your interest and understanding. I am glad that you understand what I am trying to argue here. I studied the philosophy of min...
I am not a logician but from what I read on Wiki P1 and C1 are not an example of existential generalization since the subject and object are two diffe...
As I said, the reason can be right or wrong, so it is not a good example for our discussion. The rest of our experiences are, however, coherent. For e...
I am not interested in reasoning here. The reasoning could be right or wrong. What I am interested in is reality as we experience it. I don't have dir...
Our experiences, excluding our thoughts, are always coherent. Just look around and give me an example of a single experience that is not coherent. Rea...
I said: "Which premises, P1 or P2, do you have a problem with?". I was referring to the premises rather than you. First, we have to agree on two thing...
Comments