You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

ENOAH

Comments

Pardon my presumptuous intrusion. My hastily surfacing answer is, "nothing." No so called lesser animal (a label which I dispute) has any hope/fear of...
May 10, 2024 at 03:13
Nice, Fire. The hypothetical moment when "we" divided/displaced "God's creation" our natural selves, with our constructions, choosing knowledge over l...
May 10, 2024 at 01:06
Though you are far from the point I'm about to make, and I apologize for "mishandling" yours. But for me, you have illustrated exactly the way I belie...
May 09, 2024 at 23:31
My understanding, which I will confirm in advance, won't be presented through syllogism (though I admire and respect that process). The point you--in ...
May 09, 2024 at 23:20
First, I apologize for not responding in one post. Secondly, your logic seems (to me, not a technician) very tight and I cannot at my skill level, nav...
May 09, 2024 at 23:04
And, yet, I settle at the same conclusion. I believe it, not because it is true, it is true because the mechanism of belief was triggered at the end o...
May 09, 2024 at 22:31
If you assume that that "someting" is unlike the stance, a thing so called "out there" in the real world independent of Mind. If you assume the stance...
May 09, 2024 at 22:27
that, we are.
May 09, 2024 at 22:24
Not sure I understand. My interest in malleablity is not per se driven by any moral drive. Rather, I'm suggesting--under the influence of Zhuangzi--th...
May 09, 2024 at 21:04
Hmm. Intuition tells me to look into that further, but on the face of it, I'd say no. I'm, maybe being "hard" regarding malleabiliy. But that's not wh...
May 09, 2024 at 21:00
I personally prefer the opposite (not necessarily as a moral position, but as a functional position--if the two are mutually exclusive, which, I think...
May 09, 2024 at 19:00
Very nice.. I misunderstood. Not anymore. Thank you. Here, I diverge. But no worries, armed with the info above, it is clear to me, how and why. Under...
May 09, 2024 at 16:45
Good one. Will rethink with that.
May 09, 2024 at 07:07
Nice Yes. I get that . You're probably properly using "object" associating it with "objective" and thus present, not a fleeting nothing. Fair enough. ...
May 09, 2024 at 05:47
And that's when you finally see the good in the world?
May 09, 2024 at 04:58
I think you could say that about everything. Take apple. I wasn't born knowing it. Nor did it ever instantly come to me. As I first learned it, I migh...
May 09, 2024 at 04:56
:up:
May 09, 2024 at 02:40
It's because I'm atonal, mixing with an arid humor.
May 09, 2024 at 02:01
I think this topic betrays the underlying current of art which--like it or not--drives all philosophy. Also, ultimately, if it were a Simulation (whic...
May 09, 2024 at 00:58
Interesting, your discussion of "representation." I do not believe the universe is a simulation. And I don't believe our experiences are or are a part...
May 09, 2024 at 00:48
You could start (and end) with his letter to the Galatians. But as I said, I don't think Paul was being antisemitic per se. Paul himself, Jewish, and ...
May 08, 2024 at 23:55
I agree with you that that is what it is, and I fully agree with and cannot argue against the functionality of it. But tragically, a thing all of huma...
May 08, 2024 at 03:39
Yah. I think you're right. But dont tell anybody, or it's over (the way I'm reading it--for what is the brain, but us?).
May 08, 2024 at 03:14
I agree with that. Would you entertain this read of that? Maybe it is implied in that, I don't want to presume either way. Feel free to shift your rea...
May 08, 2024 at 03:09
Actually, I did. And I was content to stay there. I think you were right, philosophy is not "ones philosophy." I think (I'll carry on as though I'm su...
May 08, 2024 at 02:47
Ok, yah, that. Sorry.
May 08, 2024 at 02:40
Isn't by "consciousness" not necessarily my deepest thoughts? Because you're right. But rather, a reflection on that thing, consciousness, and the wha...
May 08, 2024 at 02:38
Bitconnect, I'm an admirer of your thinking on other threads, outside of this (perhaps personal(?) and understandably so) one. I'm just saying, I don'...
May 08, 2024 at 00:40
I think, if there is (a) god(s), and our conventional constructions hold true, that god(s) would "see" through our self-serving reasons. In that sense...
May 07, 2024 at 23:39
Well, I wouldn't go so far as to say I've been reading much, and especially not all the religious books. But I had already agreed with you about a ric...
May 07, 2024 at 14:33
hah! :up:
May 07, 2024 at 03:36
And maybe that is expressing the closest approach within "reason" i.e., before the inevitable firewalls: paradox, contradiction (inevitable; not the k...
May 07, 2024 at 03:00
The problem is, like philosophy, science, social sciences, and humanities, some of it inevitably reveals itself to be fiction, some has a much longer ...
May 07, 2024 at 01:37
This is not intended to be remotely flippant, but, yah, they are all just illusory distinctions and therefore no one needs anything to go on. That is ...
May 07, 2024 at 01:23
Agreed! You are right. There are both subjective and objective provided human mind is processing/projecting the world. I revise/advance my thinking to...
May 07, 2024 at 00:13
a "sense" of self. What if it's stop right there? I don't like the word "illusion" but it's being used in this thread. So, if you replace "sense" with...
May 06, 2024 at 02:28
But if that "subjective knowledge of objective facts," is itself not what it proclaims with the word "knowledge." (I am already with you that this is ...
May 06, 2024 at 01:37
Totally. To add to your observation, I have found that, not only is it fact based rather than "skill" based; but, the "skills" which are taught are no...
May 05, 2024 at 23:29
Apologies.
May 05, 2024 at 23:21
Most "Hindus" would say, that vis a vis the only ultimate reality, everything projected into the world is ultimately a fiction and yet we have been de...
May 05, 2024 at 15:50
Ok, I did read that in your previous comments. Perhaps I superimposed a more polemical tone in how I read some of the "cloudier" language. Since that'...
May 05, 2024 at 02:25
In our conventions that's an acceptable statement. I'm suggesting on an alternative analysis its "meaning" is (temporarily) "constructed" in the expre...
May 04, 2024 at 13:15
What I'm meaning to say is one looks at a random dead body and the Truth of that, whatever it is, just is. But the instant one thinks or expresses "th...
May 04, 2024 at 12:50
Because it didn't suit the "orthodox" agenda, right? It was too gnostic. It presented too "mystical" a Jesus and ignored the urgency of the parousia w...
May 04, 2024 at 05:46
We've had our back and forth earlier and I was content to adjourn. But I am truly confused by your insistence and am curious to understand. I still th...
May 04, 2024 at 05:36
Lest you think I misunderstood (or, I'm case I did) in the scenario above, I would say death and its body are what they are. The moment a member of th...
May 04, 2024 at 04:26
I agree with a variation/qualifier (unless, I misunderstand and I simply agree). My qualifier is that there is neither subjective nor objective truths...
May 04, 2024 at 04:16
Consider there's no real subjective/objective, but, rather only expressing. Words are projected into the world "I like Ice cream," and received by oth...
May 04, 2024 at 03:39
A possible "explanation": you are describing a scenario where an unfamiliar feeling arises in your body. Your mind is at a loss to describe it because...
May 04, 2024 at 03:20
Ok. Please, how? Not just the one I proposed. How does it close the book on everything? And (not having reflected deeply on it) this is not the sort o...
May 03, 2024 at 01:25