Have you considered that it is simply another dimension? A dimension where there is no present. And that is precisely why we cannot perceive it. Since...
Historians going crazy with this discussion. I think of time as a building that goes upwards. We have the current floor and the floors below that are ...
You did. But indirectly. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/968214 https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/968235 This blurri...
What I want you to understand is why the measuring device is necessary. The collapse of function in fact is explained not because a person thinks or i...
The thing is that to measure we need interaction. The observer is subsumed in this interaction in such a way as to make that interaction physical. So ...
The thing is that for quantum mechanics to measure is not to be conscious but to interact with an isolated system in quantum coherence. It does not ma...
The thing is that I already have my metaphysician's hat on and I have never taken it off. And I maintain a position that is in accordance with the met...
For me there is no somehow except in a very rudimentary stage of science. You perceive something, then you study or analyze it, but you use means to a...
Yes, because observer is not consciousness. it is called a measurement, carried out by a machine or the environment. That is why the cat is not live a...
If phenomenon means to be-perceived then no. Science according to the example I have given consists in the study of perceivable or Non-perceivable rea...
You refer me to the battle realism VS idealism. For me there is always a delay of everything existing that prevents its presence from being absolutely...
The machine makes the particles travel at near-light speed until they collide. How can that not be interacting? There is also the recording, that's tr...
I would not say that. For example, when two particles collide, what we see is information in a computer. The one that perceives is the machine, but th...
I guess I can't disagree. I would say that much of science, especially physics, is composed of objects and relationships that are not directly perceiv...
Heidegger's critique of calculating reason. We are in the age of the calculating technique in which nature is manipulated or at least has the power to...
Well, yes. We have an internal time according to Kant with which we perceive time both in things that move and those that do not move. For me we do ha...
Not at all. What I am saying is that, supposing that there are simple things at the end of the composition, these simple things are explained in essen...
It is difficult for me to think that time is not something proper to external objects. Imagine a world independent of the mind in which time does not ...
Well, one of the things that makes Heidegger original is that he breaks down something like being-in-the-world, being-for-death, the authenticity, ina...
For Heidegger the subject-object relation consists in the theoretical attitude in which man tries to free himself from that which constitutes him (lan...
Yes, but then it would not be an argument from composition. There is a correlation between composing and being composed. A being that composes finds i...
I think that in another place I spoke to you about temporality in Husserl as a constituent of consciousness as self-affection. According to this view ...
I totally agree. I should not have said objective but only transcendental. But it is still true with respect to another form of temporality which is l...
I agree that there is irremediably a type of time that exists as Bergson points out. But I would not be so sure that it is something simply subjective...
We must be very cautious in introducing consciousness as an observer. The two things are not the same. The same has to be said about seeing and measur...
For Kant time is a pure intuition, i.e. it is an a priori structure that allows us to organize events. The movement is as it is represented in physics...
When I think of a critique of empiricism I think of Kant. He criticized the idea of tabula rasa that persisted in empiricism. Hence his whole philosop...
If I understand Putnam correctly, he says that a mind-independent world would explain the being of an external entity. But our language does not have ...
In my view the simple thing, at the end of the series of composition is contingent upon the whole in terms of ratio cognoscendi: "A simple thing by it...
No proof, so I dismiss it. You barely mentioned it. I can't consider it as an argument. I have not taken the arguments from Frege and Husserl but from...
You will have to prove to me that all philosophy is expressed through syllogisms, premises and conclusions. And I have refuted it. You will have to gi...
I would say that this is what an argument looks like in the philosophy you like. But obviously philosophy has a very broad style of expression. At lea...
I have already done so. I think you're reading it wrong, I hope it's not on purpose. I said that such a premise is proven by the fact that several peo...
I'm sorry but what you have said is formal juggling. And in no way have you validly refuted or counterargued. The argument is very simple : Cognitive ...
That is easy to demonstrate. Think of the "inventor" of the Pythagorean theorem. Something like a theorem has survived and persisted in its existence ...
The text you quote from Mario Bunge seems to ignore what I said in the last part of my comment. That is, that the Pythagorean theorem remains true eve...
That is something that does not follow from what I have said. I have said that a simple thing must subordinate itself to the whole in order to acquire...
When we think of a triangle and think of it together with the Pythagorean theorem as a property of certain types of triangles, it is difficult to say ...
HI, A simple thing by itself does not constitute a whole. Therefore, in order to constitute a whole, the simple thing must subordinate itself to the c...
Hi, When we see a glass bottle in front of us, the bottle is related to us. However we cannot eliminate the bottle from the relation, because the bott...
What I have said before is also said of value. How could pain be thought of in a being like us, exempt from its valuation? It is not possible insofar ...
There is a fragment in Philosophical Investigations that I remember in accordance with what you say: I would say that the possibility of following the...
Comments