JuanZu

An idea is the meaningful core of a series of signifiers. And its nature is transcendence.

Our intentional acts, as they are thrown into the possible and the non-given of the world, imply operationally a continuity between the measuring appa...

I am a little disappointed with your response. You have simply reiterated what you already said, reaffirming your position but without providing any a...

I am not referring to the physical/ chemical sciences, which are indeed reducible to each other. I am referring to the vast array of sciences and disc...

I don't think you fully understand what a reduction means. What do you understand by reduction in any case?

Yes. But we must keep in mind that physicalists have chosen a couple of sciences (in this case, physics and chemistry) from which they seek to derive,...

Can any of the physical-chemical sciences explain the intentionality of consciousness or explain what a noema is better than phenomenology? Or the Pyt...

You should accept the premise of the possible world, since in our relationship with the world, it is shown as something that is not given once and for...

Not in the world just like that, but in a possible world. But it is still a world as telos and exteriority. That is why possibility has a horizon of r...

If you look closely, its possibility is determined by the horizon of the world. How can something be possible if it does not mean possible IN THE WORL...

I speak of continuity because our intentions are thrown into the world. That is, there is a determining exteriority in our intentional acts (It is no ...

If it is purely conceptual, then it is impossible to explain how, operationally, there is a correspondence between our concepts (language) and the wor...

I agree. I should not have said measurement excluding the scientist's intentional acts. What I should have said to avoid this misunderstanding that yo...

Not at all. I am simply describing what is actually happening. Since we do not interact with the isolated quantum system, the measuring device does so...

I am referring to measurement as the phenomenon that takes place in the measuring device. For example, interference, detection, etc. I am not referrin...

Keep in mind that the quantum system is in isolation. The measuring device, as I understand it, breaks that isolation at the moment of measurement. Th...

Measuring is actually an interaction, like with a quantum sensor. There is simply an interference that appears and was not there before. We are the on...

Have you considered non-linear and retroactive causality?

For me, what is artificial is not another world, as if it were necessary to establish an ontological dualism between the natural and the artificial. I...

Consider the material from which the measuring device is made. Don't you think there is an ontological continuity between the device and the quantum p...

That is a strange statement you make. If it possesses some kind of mental property and it is ours, it is like simply saying that it does not possess i...

If you look closely at what I am trying to explain, I do not limit the idea of a sign to mechanism or physicalism. I only limit it to our relationship...

From the measuring device's side, yes, the signs are material and mechanical. And these signs have effects on us; they create information and knowledg...

Because You interact with the quantum world through the measuring device. But this device has no mental properties. So you have to adapt to the device...

I leave the mystery of consciousness intact. I simply speak of a necessary ontological continuity that is expressed through signs. Colours, sounds and...

To me, that sounds like the ghost in the machine. But if we look closely at how the measuring device works, that fantasy of the ghost in the machine d...

I wouldn't say they are unnatural. Rather, improbable. Something like a measuring device is not out of this world. That is, there is a reason why ther...

Once we naturalise the measuring device, it becomes something external to subjectivity. In this sense, measurement is a natural process like any other...

I believe that philosophy takes a stand against common sense. Philosophy must question our most deeply rooted certainties. In that sense, philosophy i...

I have always been somewhat perplexed by this. The Copenhagen interpretation revives a strong idealism like that of Berkeley. My position, as seen els...

Exactly.

According to my theory, there is no information in that list, as if something passes from your mind to symbols on a screen. As I have tried to explain...

Hi, The difference I explain between present, past and future is a difference in their constitutive roles. If the past and future are constituents of ...

From my point of view, the division between past, present, and future is like a painting where three colors are differentiated without there being a c...

Exactly. But the flow of time implies that the relation with the past and the future is not discontinuous. That is why our present is constantly relat...

In my opinion, in order to understand the other of consciousness, one must understand how consciousness is constituted at the most fundamental level. ...

From my point of view, what we call reality does not validate our theories. In science, we work with phenomena and references, not with the aim of ada...

This is wrong once you understand the physics of a USB flash drive. That is why I have specifically referred to the cells and the charge they hold by ...

I claim that nothing is stored. Actually what happens is that it is physically configured in loaded and unloaded cells. We can associate between charg...

In my opinion, we need to understand other aspect of consciousness. One must understand how consciousness is constituted at the most fundamental level...

The beauty of the object, however, is only given as an external property in relation to a subject that interprets the sculpture. In this case the info...

But if the shape of the sculpture is beautiful, was it beautiful before anyone looked at it?

In what sense?

Information is never in the first place. In the first place there are always signs arranged in one way or another. The difference is that there is an ...

I cannot call that information. Because in reality these rings are signs that refer precisely to the age of the tree. But this, the age of the tree, i...

In the case of the tree each ring is nothing more than a property of the tree. But in no case is it information because what you get from those rings ...

I would say: you have no possible information. There is no possible in-formation/interpretation process due to the absence of signs. Or the absence of...

The thing is that what you call information is only given in the result of a process of interpretation. That is why I cannot call memory information. ...

For me qualia is a configuration given an information process. For I understand information not as a substance but as the relationship. Information fo...

From my point of view the signs contained in the letter did not contain information about your home address. What actually happened is that some signs...