You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

AmadeusD

Comments

Supernatural was probably a bad word to use - 'revealed' serves my purpose better. Need not be non-physical, but certainly requires a brute fact about...
November 28, 2023 at 22:02
This supports my position. A realist can't make a claim that a judgement is objective, because that would entail they were not realists with regarding...
November 28, 2023 at 22:00
And they would be wrong in every sense of the word, unless invoking a supernatural source of morality.
November 28, 2023 at 21:53
While your conclusion there may be correct, your example doesn't touch it. Those are subjective terms for subjective demarcations within actual states...
November 28, 2023 at 21:52
To me, a state of affairs is an actual, obtaining situation in the world independent of further judgement. Something like "There are others" could be ...
November 28, 2023 at 21:24
It strikes me that the claim could not be made, but for a subject perceiving it's value. That, to my, suggests it is a subjective judgement on the har...
November 28, 2023 at 21:19
This sounds a little JPB :P Truth being functional, to my mind, removes all real meaning from the word. Then again, 'my truth' tends to be an accepted...
November 28, 2023 at 21:16
But it patently is not a state of affairs, and at very, very best, a description of one. What state of affairs outside of the mind indicates that comm...
November 28, 2023 at 21:14
Sure. I have no problem with that formulation, i would just prefer to not use the term 'objective' as neither my example, or stretching to obligation,...
November 28, 2023 at 21:04
I've not made those assumptions. But my guess is that those earlier claims are general - they are objectively true, because they are ill-defined. E.g ...
November 28, 2023 at 19:38
I don't understand this to be a 'feature' of anything, but a subjective judgement. I'm wanting to know what is at the bedrock of that claim, to suppor...
November 28, 2023 at 19:17
Interesting. That's somewhat confusing in the sense that the example you used doesn't quite do that. It seems to be either illustrating or lamenting t...
November 28, 2023 at 07:02
Hmm really? The population ethics boom and subsequent altruism movements stemming out of Oxford seem purely materialistic to a fault (my view). The cl...
November 28, 2023 at 05:25
You beat me to these questions... LOL.
November 28, 2023 at 05:19
Which ones, what mind-independent feature, and how could that come to our sensibility if not through phenomenal interpretation (i.e not a fact about a...
November 28, 2023 at 05:17
I think that if youre not talking to physicists or academic philosophers, thats probably a good move for self-preservation and time-saving :P
November 28, 2023 at 05:06
THe word here is still 'cost'. "X cost me Y (in the past)". Im no linguist - but this appears to me just to be a shortcut. Referring 'as at' the time ...
November 28, 2023 at 05:03
I think its entirely possible you have been refuted in this exact way. The logic and explanative power have been found wanting. I tend to agree. All e...
November 28, 2023 at 00:31
Ok, this is certainly a clearer handle. Thank you for that.
November 27, 2023 at 22:04
@"Pantagruel" Ah, okay so you take it that (in reference to later comment) socially-reinforcing 'right' actions are those which are reinforced by virt...
November 27, 2023 at 21:33
Can you be sure you're not just referencing inter-generational awareness? There's nothing per se spiritual to that notion - though, as @"javra" noted ...
November 27, 2023 at 20:02
https://philosophynow.org/issues/115/Is_Morality_Objective Just thought i'd throw this in for comments. They all appear to be badly argued responses, ...
November 27, 2023 at 19:12
I've been interested in how people find drugs affect personhood ever since finding out some people truly believe a loss of consciousness constitutes d...
November 27, 2023 at 06:01
This is something i've been stuck on thinking about identity. I start with that there is no personal identity - Occaming everything away... but in mov...
November 27, 2023 at 05:58
A mere comment after reading through (most) of the thread: I'm noticing a number discussions are not about things that could be called objective, even...
November 27, 2023 at 05:45
I think this depends on whether you're asking a genuinely racialised question (i.e i want to hear from non-white people) or whether you're talking abo...
November 27, 2023 at 05:19
If it helps, the schematic Wayfarer linked includes, without any confusion, my understanding of hte first fifteen pages :) I'm finding that as long as...
November 27, 2023 at 05:12
Bump ? Haha... Bit late to the party, but late enough to start another! Just picking up the Critique for the first time. Having traversed most of it's...
November 27, 2023 at 02:29
where I live this is true but of “sex”. It’s a bizarre thing to do if you’re dealing with a different issue (gender). I don’t think identifying as a m...
November 25, 2023 at 17:11
that is not what I think it have said.
November 25, 2023 at 17:09
hey mate / thanks so much for such a thorough reply. I don’t know that this is going to be a fruitful exchange because I’m seeing some talking past ea...
November 24, 2023 at 22:49
hi again Vaskane. Forgive but that is clearly untrue. If you have a look on that page under “characterisation” it makes the specific delineation I’m t...
November 24, 2023 at 18:24
I’m getting the feeling there’s been a bit of a leap-frog here. If truth is mind-dependent even if about mind-independent objects, how are we assessin...
November 24, 2023 at 18:10
This would metaphysically turn on whether determinism is wholly true, constrictively true or not at all true I think. I go with the former on the info...
November 24, 2023 at 17:43
thanks very much for your reply. I still think you are seriously misapprehending what personal identity is in this context (the thought experiments). ...
November 24, 2023 at 17:34
This speaks to, but doesn't answer the problem. Multiple personality disorder is, even on a laymans interpretation, many 'personalities' within one 'p...
November 24, 2023 at 02:15
I think your terms a little muddled here but i could be fully misunderstanding you. I believe you're referring to what Parfit thinks 'matters' after d...
November 24, 2023 at 01:57
Hi Vaskane, I take you to be speaking about social identity, and not numerical identy. From my understanding the identity problem is one of what makes...
November 24, 2023 at 01:44
Mine is variations on the Branch Line Case from Parfit, It’s just so juicy
November 20, 2023 at 04:40