You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

AmadeusD

Comments

Perhaps. But that seems unlikely given the 2020 result for Biden. Unfortunately.
April 09, 2024 at 20:21
All words are reductive, but concepts don't need to be. I think Bob is trying to ascertain the word-resistant concepts we all accept prior to language...
April 09, 2024 at 20:18
I take this to be an avoidance. So, can you answer it with the 'where' rather than a reference to it?
April 09, 2024 at 20:16
Dropped this in another thread just now, but I found out I got an A on my first undergrad Phil writing assignment last night. I am pretty darn happy.
April 09, 2024 at 20:06
Absolutely. I chose this in my first batch of Phil books (i ordered about 12 at once) before starting Uni because I assumed I would never get to it ot...
April 09, 2024 at 20:06
I understand that you are refusing to engage with what you have obviously understood: Your position makes no sense. Which is why that question is obvi...
April 09, 2024 at 20:03
There is no good answer to this question. I have read the remainder of your reply, and i appreciate it. But this question just doesn't have an answer ...
April 09, 2024 at 20:02
I'm not so sure you're right here. "The president is sort of like Goebbels." 'If you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then ...
April 09, 2024 at 20:00
Hmm. Again, im not so sure (literally - i'm unsure, lol). Many things are much better understood by demonstration. Including many thoughts. "I was thi...
April 09, 2024 at 19:44
INterestingly, Parfit was well aware of Buddhist thinking on this. Appendix J of this book, Reasons & Persons, is called 'Buddah's View'. I'm not ther...
April 09, 2024 at 06:56
I think this is, fwiw, one of the clearest, best things I've seen on this. Thanks for that. Really concise and illustrative. I don't think your two co...
April 09, 2024 at 06:50
I don't think it's either from my reading of that chapter. It seems that what Parfit is trying to do is simply point out that there are thoughts, with...
April 09, 2024 at 06:35
You for sure do not. You are speaking purely about linguistic conventions here and not what they pertain to. There is a clear distinction between a sh...
April 09, 2024 at 06:20
I would simply assume your second sentence was a lie ;) It is more likely that this is true, or that I have a mental lapse, or that I am day-dreaming,...
April 09, 2024 at 04:52
You may enjoy Rob Amster.
April 09, 2024 at 04:46
Unless I am totally misapprehending your meaning... Nice, heh. Don't be put off. The insistent know-alls are few, in my experience. I'm still in the s...
April 09, 2024 at 04:45
Ok, Cool. I reject that. Someone's incredulity, or lack of knowledge isn't a reason to come to a rash conclusion. Novel situations don't, in the vast ...
April 09, 2024 at 04:36
'Supposed' is the operative word here. And that supposition is erroneous. Point to the Good, sans human interaction? It literally doesn't come into co...
April 09, 2024 at 04:27
Not sure. But there are also elected officials who think people can change sex, so meh. It's all a carousel of stupid.
April 09, 2024 at 03:48
Being a conservative, to an anti-conservative, is tantamount to being a literal Nazi. Its a big carousel of stupid.
April 09, 2024 at 03:47
Again, refer to Parfit treating this exact issue as you all are treating it:
April 09, 2024 at 03:44
Yeah, i think you've intuited how i'd explain that response. The issue is what reason would that person have to invoke God? I can see none. :lol:
April 09, 2024 at 03:38
With you so far, and no objections.. Still with you, and clearly that's an interest for several hundred hard-working writers. Yes it is. Yes it does. ...
April 09, 2024 at 03:35
"these terms" being that we're insinuating (as a jumping-off point) that Telepathy is 'Direct'. So, in these terms that we're discussing, without bein...
April 09, 2024 at 03:30
I don't understand why that's being asked, though. The proceeding passage doesn't help me I'm sorry. Ethics claims this. I think it fails. Ethics is j...
April 09, 2024 at 01:33
:ok: :ok: Im unsure it does. But, it could be. I disagree, but thats important. This does nothing for the discussion. If there is no better way to 'he...
April 09, 2024 at 01:29
I would think so too. As I don't know A.Ms work, I'll take your word for it - but this actually exemplifies exactly what Im talking about. Taking a mo...
April 09, 2024 at 00:56
Hmm, fair. Thanks for clarifying. It is, though. Nothing you've said comes close to even a reasonable objection to it. Those more meta-ethical bits yo...
April 08, 2024 at 23:24
Gang gang.
April 08, 2024 at 23:21
In the context of this discussion, I don't think this means much unless we return to conflating 'perceptual experience' with 'phenomenal experience'. ...
April 08, 2024 at 23:20
Fair enough then :P
April 08, 2024 at 22:50
pgs 224-226 where he follows B. Williams and G.C Lichtenberg "Descartes, famously, made such a claim. When he asked if there was anything that he coul...
April 08, 2024 at 22:49
I am somewhat lost now. I don't know why you're asking these things here. The metaethical discussion about why a person might find something morally i...
April 08, 2024 at 22:30
This is Parfit's conclusion - he insinuates that there is no personal identity, and so the Cogito could not be a basis for a discreet doubter.
April 08, 2024 at 22:26
You can guess. You can use statistical analysis to guess approximately - and people are disposed to overreact when someone comes close to their though...
April 08, 2024 at 22:22
Suffice to say you are not an honest interlocutor. Take it easy.
April 08, 2024 at 22:17
I probably don't understand the concluding question adequately, I don't think. I'll take a stab at the end. As to the description of ethics generally ...
April 08, 2024 at 22:12
I've just been through a section of Parfit's Reasons and Persons which deals with exactly this issue - whether future reasons constitute 'now' reasons...
April 08, 2024 at 21:07
I think you might be trolling at this point. You asked for a logically sound argument. THere it is. You're now objecting to empirical matters. I canno...
April 08, 2024 at 20:54
Is laughably wrong. I think this is a mistake. I think it is a mistake that leaves us, necessarily, in a hopeless loop of arguing with anyone who disa...
April 08, 2024 at 20:08
Definitely. Personally, i'm not even willing to consider telepathy as formulated for this reason. It's a step-too-far in speculation. I think DR would...
April 08, 2024 at 02:24
Short: Yes Mid: This is my view of morality, and we're lucky that only humans are sentient enough to be considered moral agents. This means most peopl...
April 08, 2024 at 01:30
Having not read any responses my take is: You're describing despair, in other words. This is a organisational tool that often avoids sunk-cost fallaci...
April 08, 2024 at 01:27
Isn't this kind of side-stepping the debate and saying "You have your truth, I have mine" the way Uni students who can't handle be wrong do? (applies ...
April 08, 2024 at 01:20
I would like for this to be a bit of comedic self-awareness *crosses fingers*.
April 08, 2024 at 01:00
While this tradition is slowly dying off (luckily) it has, for about 30 years, been a rite of passage for 21-Year-Olds to drink an entire Yard Glass h...
April 08, 2024 at 00:36
Telepathy is an example i've given a few times in the thread. Has been ignored. On it's current formulation, it would be 'direct'. There is literally ...
April 08, 2024 at 00:23
:up:
April 08, 2024 at 00:17
Interesting. Even moreso in that this smacks of many of our number here on TPF. (unrelated)An interesting article from a few years back with bold clai...
April 08, 2024 at 00:06