You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Leontiskos

Comments

Indeed, similar to what I said in a different thread: This goes to ' point that—as I would put it—ratiocination involves temporal succession. We do no...
July 29, 2024 at 20:15
Aufklärer - "Enlighteners" They realized that the call to "sapere aude" was premature, and required a more educated populus before it would be able to...
July 29, 2024 at 20:10
You planted your foot directly in the can of worms. The bacterial flagellum is ground zero for debates surrounding irreducible complexity and intellig...
July 29, 2024 at 19:06
And there's nothing wrong with that, although it does deviate from the previous topic of the butterfly effect, chaos theory, and the "tending of the b...
July 29, 2024 at 18:33
- You have demonstrated my point most effectively with your brazen misrepresentations and lack of desire to even understand what is being said. My pos...
July 29, 2024 at 18:22
Okay, good. I agree that it would be a mistake to study books to the exclusion of all else. The question that then arises with respect to knowledge an...
July 29, 2024 at 18:10
Sure, but the difficulty occurs later, when the cheerleaders for Scientism are fast asleep and the real questions arise. --- - Yep! :grin:
July 29, 2024 at 07:25
I do end up ignoring users who can't drum up anything more than shoddy strawmen, actually. It was wise of you to cut off that sentence after the comma...
July 29, 2024 at 07:06
- There is a consistent stopgap associated with your account of subjectivity (e.g. desire, intention, belief). Whenever the dog starts sniffing around...
July 29, 2024 at 07:00
I often wonder if this odd commitment of Banno's derives from his Wittgenstenianism:
July 29, 2024 at 06:51
In an ideal world the poster of a thread would be able to determine the posting limit within their thread, and perhaps a user would be able to determi...
July 29, 2024 at 06:32
I don't see that our exchange has been of anything approaching high quality. Perhaps the quality would have been improved if there had been limits. Se...
July 29, 2024 at 06:28
Really? I literally wrote that post after you wrote your reply. :roll: Yes. It is the technological equivalent of, "Take ten deep breaths before respo...
July 29, 2024 at 06:10
- Interesting. Or perhaps a category that is meant to be more specialized and on-topic as far as the threads go.
July 29, 2024 at 06:07
Good post. :up: I think it has shifted a lot over time, and I again invoke . This is not necessarily a bad thing, but we have to recognize the potenti...
July 29, 2024 at 05:55
See the sentence prior to the one you quoted: The point here is that such a rule does not have to apply to each thread equally. So they don't turn int...
July 29, 2024 at 05:43
Yes, I agree. I have been part of a no-editing forum, which is a bit extreme but over time it really improved my contributions. I think a few minutes ...
July 29, 2024 at 05:30
I look forward to someone engaging my suggestions in a more-than-superficial manner. Something like (3) would unquestionably "discourage participation...
July 29, 2024 at 04:58
You are obsessed with contradicting me. My first point: I had considered writing a slightly longer post as a separate thread, entitled, "On the Promot...
July 29, 2024 at 04:40
Have you found that your trolling has become better or worse as you approach your 90's? In any case, I am flattered that you spend so much time readin...
July 29, 2024 at 04:20
It is a case in point that you and Clark were both too busy disagreeing with me to even notice that I gave a character limit, not a word limit. Your f...
July 29, 2024 at 04:14
There is a difference between characters and words. My post was 1,785 characters. I am only suggesting 500 characters for OPs, which at a minimum is a...
July 29, 2024 at 04:12
Not according to the Site Guidelines and How to Write an OP.
July 29, 2024 at 04:03
I agree. I disagree. I don't even know how this is supposed to be a real argument. If "participation" is defined as unthoughtful contributions, then t...
July 29, 2024 at 04:01
Discourse can be dialogical, but it need not be. Still, a book can be a page in a discussion. Not infrequently in history have books been written in r...
July 29, 2024 at 03:40
Ah, good. I see what you were saying, now. Yep.
July 29, 2024 at 03:13
It is that, but I think the philologists would object if we were to reduce language to a social construction, or if we were to reduce it to the matter...
July 29, 2024 at 02:55
For the Quadrivium, but not for the Trivium. The Trivium pertains to communication, generally speaking. Yes, but one must begin with communication in ...
July 29, 2024 at 02:45
I think books are the highest form of discourse, and to criticize books is a fortiori to criticize every other form of discourse. Hence my point about...
July 29, 2024 at 02:29
Classically after studying the Trivium (of grammar, logic, and rhetoric), one would study the Quadrivium: Astronomy, the study of number in space and ...
July 29, 2024 at 02:16
* Disclaimer: I realize PlushForums is in maintenance mode, and will not be adding any new features. This post is future-oriented. I just wanted to jo...
July 29, 2024 at 02:03
Except that without such logic one will not be able to draw inferences, and this will limit their knowledge. The question of how the conclusion relate...
July 29, 2024 at 01:45
Or is it how to draw new conclusions from what is currently known?
July 29, 2024 at 00:44
No. And we may want to work towards OPs that are more than a single sentence long.
July 28, 2024 at 23:53
The skill of grammar allows us to understand what others are saying, and this skill is going by the wayside. Those who read well tend to be good at un...
July 28, 2024 at 23:49
If the Barber shaves them, then they don't shave themselves If they don't shave themselves, then the Barber shaves them An absurdity arises when "they...
July 28, 2024 at 20:47
- Uncle Sam?
July 28, 2024 at 19:42
To be something is to do something, and to be a philosopher is to do philosophy. If philosophy requires the study of books, then that which prevents o...
July 28, 2024 at 19:35
It seems to me that anxiety is a generalized or disseminated form of fear, and fear is aversion to an undesirable future possibility. Like fears, some...
July 28, 2024 at 19:30
It is true that a lie cannot be represented by formal logic, as it pertains to intention. Still, Augustine defined a lie 1500 years ago, "Locutio cont...
July 28, 2024 at 18:48
Trying to overcome the principle of non-contradiction with the "Liar's paradox" is a bit like throwing a broken toothpick at the Bull of Wall Street a...
July 28, 2024 at 18:07
Right, but is it possible that his self-same statement is both the truth and a lie? I say that it is not possible. Someone may be telling the truth or...
July 28, 2024 at 17:50
Then why do I have 13 new replies from you today, 11 of which are in a single thread? You're a spammer and I don't have time for this stupid shit. Get...
July 28, 2024 at 17:41
It seems that you have no clear idea what I am supposed to have said: Which is wonderful: you run around accusing people of lying and you have no idea...
July 28, 2024 at 02:41
Does bookkeeping involve wonder and investigation? I'm not sure science is bookkeeping at all. It seems more basically to be an investigation of the u...
July 28, 2024 at 02:36
Yes, but it seems to me that in this case we are considering the assertion, "I am a liar," or, "I always tell lies," rather than, "I am lying." To lie...
July 28, 2024 at 01:33
- I've addressed this before. "You habitually do such-and-such." (e.g. "you are under the spell of material implication") "No I don't!" "I think you d...
July 28, 2024 at 01:27
Okay, I appreciate that. Again, trying to get to the point: If no one in their right mind would say or mean X, then X is nonsensical No one in their r...
July 28, 2024 at 00:50
Yes, good. You were replying to my argument about speakers, and to disregard "whether in right mind or not" is to misrepresent my argument. It does li...
July 28, 2024 at 00:43
Still playing dumb, then. I've yet to find anyone online who intentionally misrepresents their interlocutor as often as you.
July 28, 2024 at 00:20