You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Leontiskos

Comments

I know. Have you ever listened to Musk himself? There is lots of video interview footage available online. I think he recently did a long interview wi...
November 10, 2024 at 22:17
He's been doing that for a long time. Why has everything changed all of the sudden?
November 10, 2024 at 22:14
Be afraid? This was a photoshopped joke post on Twitter/X captioned, "Let that sink in." Musk was a just three years ago. Now he has been demonized fo...
November 10, 2024 at 22:04
- We're not. It's fairly obvious that the philosophy goes on. If someone posts a thread arguing that conscious minds do not exist, we do not close the...
November 10, 2024 at 21:55
Revising all one's beliefs is not perfectly easy. I said changing a societal belief from X to Y would have radical implications. You replied that "one...
November 10, 2024 at 21:49
"Can still believe" is not a good test. For example, someone who does not believe that humans have greater dignity than animals "can still believe" th...
November 10, 2024 at 20:47
I think Americans are tired of institutional capture, faceless politicians, and demagoguery. Harris is a creation and puppet of the DNC; Trump is a th...
November 10, 2024 at 20:14
"You are presupposing a conscious mind, but I deny a conscious mind." So has this person stopped doing philosophy? Nope, in fact they haven't. The phi...
November 10, 2024 at 20:02
Why think this? Different beliefs often lead to different behavior. A pragmatist could argue for a belief on the basis of a desired behavior, as you s...
November 10, 2024 at 06:24
Nah. It has to be ad hominem here]. But it's worth remembering that not everyone votes. Historically speaking, voter turnout was high, but less than 2...
November 10, 2024 at 05:17
- The post you quote does not say what you think it does.
November 10, 2024 at 03:23
Good post. This is a clear representation of the variety of univocity that I would oppose. I don't think we have to pick a poison. They are different ...
November 10, 2024 at 02:54
No, you didn't. And if you want to say something like that then I would ask you what philosophy of mind studies. I don't think your arguments are very...
November 10, 2024 at 02:29
@"fdrake" has tried to force things into his set theoretic paradigm. It is unnatural but also unreflective, given that it fails to consider why set th...
November 10, 2024 at 02:24
Does the psychologist think theories of motivation need to be justified? If the answer is "yes," then the psychologist is involved in performative con...
November 10, 2024 at 02:16
I can sympathize with this. @"J" has an interest in how debates ever come to an end and how intersubjective agreement is ever established. These dialo...
November 09, 2024 at 21:15
Solipsism would be but one example of a philosophical position which denies the claim that there are independent minds, and therefore that there is an...
November 09, 2024 at 21:05
The deeper truth here is Aristotle's mean. One can run from "over-generalization" to the opposite error, but the truth lies in neither over-generaliza...
November 09, 2024 at 19:05
Your argument seems to say something very different: (7) does not seem to follow. Indeed the opposite would follow, where "philosophical" is replaced ...
November 09, 2024 at 19:01
Note too how your logic here is invalid as it hitches up to your argument. "If philosophy is not relevant to some domain, then philosophy is not relev...
November 09, 2024 at 18:41
- Yep, pretty much.
November 09, 2024 at 18:37
This is a good example of the problematic set-theoretic assumptions you are working from. Is the engine car related to the train? Is H20 related to bi...
November 09, 2024 at 18:35
November 09, 2024 at 18:32
Something like that. In every discipline other than philosophy there are unallowed criticisms of the form, "You are presupposing X, but I deny X." For...
November 09, 2024 at 18:31
Sure, but why in the world would we assume that X isn't relevant to any claim whose context is philosophy? There is no such X.
November 09, 2024 at 18:25
I don't see these as problems. There are two conceptions of philosophical foundationalness in this thread. The first says that philosophical justifica...
November 09, 2024 at 18:22
I don't think your sentence here is grammatically coherent. Not sure what it is supposed to mean. Same with your argument given earlier. When you try ...
November 09, 2024 at 18:09
November 09, 2024 at 00:51
- Fair points on the whole. :up:
November 09, 2024 at 00:44
Who cares about your "world standards" (which conveniently and arrogantly exclude most of the world)? The point you were responding to had to do with ...
November 09, 2024 at 00:39
Why would this follow?
November 09, 2024 at 00:35
"If the Democrats move left they would only be centrist in Europe, therefore such a move would not make them left." The U.S. is not Europe. This is no...
November 08, 2024 at 21:10
"Majority of Americans support mass deportations" (CBS). Trump's love of tariffs is idiosyncratic from all political angles, true. But because of that...
November 08, 2024 at 21:00
By "truth" you mean people who care about truth? I'd say an OP which cares about truth would have a more truthful first sentence. :grin:
November 08, 2024 at 20:32
I'm not opposed to that, but what I said was the opposite. I don't think I've left that nearly as unexamined as you have. You seem to be committed to ...
November 08, 2024 at 19:45
- It's not a subset, it's a ratio (Latin). We could study a deer according to its totality, and we could study a deer according to its aspect of movab...
November 08, 2024 at 18:32
Why does the study of being qua motion (physics) implicate the study of being qua being (metaphysics)? Because motion is a kind of being. I am putting...
November 08, 2024 at 18:12
- :up:
November 08, 2024 at 18:00
I see this as fairly simple. There is a context of all contexts and that which pertains to it is what we call "philosophy." You are relying on a very ...
November 08, 2024 at 17:52
- :up: The elites navigated the 2008 financial crisis extraordinarily well, but the "morality card" has now been overplayed and the broader political ...
November 08, 2024 at 17:34
Are you claiming that knowledge does not exist outside mathematics? I don't see why "the elements being less well-defined" results in any serious prob...
November 08, 2024 at 17:08
Okay. In that case I agree with you that, "...the starting point of philosophy is in fact the realization that its inquiries cannot be brought to an e...
November 08, 2024 at 17:05
The parties are in disarray. 2016 saw two populists make waves, Trump and Sanders. If I recall, when Sanders was checked by the powers of the DNC, 4/1...
November 08, 2024 at 07:24
Yes, I think we are on the same page. I was thinking of that as justification, but as your post indicates, if an answer to an inquiry cannot be defini...
November 08, 2024 at 02:16
Sure, but isn't it that there is no end because there are no presuppositions? If an inquiry requires support and presuppositions are the ultimate supp...
November 08, 2024 at 01:45
In: Bannings  — view comment
It is left-leaning to simply assume that something is homophobic, transphobic, or racist, which is precisely what you are doing in failing to address ...
November 07, 2024 at 21:57
:lol: I see it more as an aside, since your OP is not centered on this topic. My first post only touched on it in my first two sentences. I don't know...
November 07, 2024 at 21:53
Yep. And this has become built-in to culture in a remarkable way. I think of movies like The Matrix. The odd thing is that the DNC hasn't at all figur...
November 07, 2024 at 21:40
- Right, but I am uncomfortable with viewing the presuppositionaless-ness of philosophy as "an argumentative trick." There is something substantive ab...
November 07, 2024 at 21:34
Good post. I may have fallen too far behind in this thread, but I don't think we have to choose between logic and physics to explain such an argument....
November 07, 2024 at 21:29