You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Leontiskos

Comments

Why do you think the truth is owed in the first place? Even moralists who prohibit lying seldom say such a thing. It's not at all clear what "eroding ...
December 02, 2024 at 06:05
- The contradiction is very much present in your posts. For example: "We can say it is true now or we can now say it is true that the planet will stil...
December 02, 2024 at 00:58
And you could paraphrase the health statement as, "Your health will improve* if you engage in healthy activities." I don't see any difference. Rather,...
December 02, 2024 at 00:49
- :up: A few days ago Peter Singer did an informal interview where he defends moral realism, which is helpful given his atheism: https://www.youtube.c...
December 02, 2024 at 00:43
You are running in the same circles as Janus. The point has nothing to do with speech. It has to do with truth. You want something to "be the case" wh...
December 02, 2024 at 00:28
But we've already been over this. To predicate existence of something is to predicate a truth. Is your claim about existence supposed to have nothing ...
December 02, 2024 at 00:26
- You and @"Banno" are simply contradicting yourselves. You think truth is and is not dependent on minds. I'm not sure what else there is to say here....
November 29, 2024 at 20:57
- Maybe you should make a new movie where humans are enslaved, and then the protagonist comes along, and instead of trying to free them, merely tries ...
November 29, 2024 at 20:45
No, it's really not. I mean, sure, coercion is evil, but it's not at all the point of the movie. You seem like a liberal or libertarian who has tried ...
November 28, 2024 at 04:41
- If you don't think red > blue then I'm not sure we watched the same movie. The goal of "freeing minds" is not to let them choose between red and blu...
November 24, 2024 at 04:16
But that's why I brought him up. "You are beginning to look a lot like Cypher here." "Cypher is teh best!" :razz: If the whole premise of The Matrix i...
November 24, 2024 at 02:38
- Cypher was nowhere near the protagonist. He is presented as an evil character who betrays his friends and chooses a false simulation over reality. I...
November 23, 2024 at 20:34
In that case, my difficulty with the OP is that we are trying to get degrees out of the substance/mode binary. Maybe that can be done, but at face val...
November 23, 2024 at 20:31
- :up:
November 23, 2024 at 20:21
- What's odd to me about @"Patterner"'s claim is that it is diametrically opposed to the entire thrust of the movie. He is saying that the Architect a...
November 23, 2024 at 20:19
How could it not? You want to say that if all minds ceased to exist, it both would and would not be true that there is gold in Boora. On the one hand ...
November 22, 2024 at 23:38
I find this thread dizzying. I don't understand what anyone is saying or why anyone thinks their implicit inferences are valid. We are moving from 17t...
November 22, 2024 at 23:25
Which is to say that Cypher thinks that The Matrix is more real than the real world, no? If your measurement is experience, and Cypher thinks The Matr...
November 22, 2024 at 23:13
Yep, and this goes to @"Srap Tasmaner"'s notion of "degenerate cases" (of, say, the material conditional). If one does not see logic as teleological, ...
November 22, 2024 at 23:10
You haven't shown your defense to be coherent: "X will be tomorrow"? What does that mean, other than, "X will be true tomorrow?" As I said above, ther...
November 22, 2024 at 22:56
Yep. :up: Also logic, for those who don't think it is mere symbol manipulation.
November 22, 2024 at 22:29
You should have read beyond the first few sentences of that post.
November 22, 2024 at 19:33
Do you see how the motion of the last train car has more dependencies than that of the first (engine) car?
November 22, 2024 at 19:12
Except "that something will exist" is a propositional truth. So he hasn't managed to speak about existence apart from propositions and truth. I have t...
November 21, 2024 at 23:10
But her existence is equally dependent on her mother. Arguably, you are less real because you're farther back the line. The train engine is most real....
November 21, 2024 at 22:56
Do you want to say that, "X will be true tomorrow," is different from, "Tomorrow, X will be true"? I don't see a proper distinction between the two. B...
November 21, 2024 at 22:49
I never said it was. I was answering your question about eugenics. At the very least I would say that is impermissible on account of societal example ...
November 21, 2024 at 21:15
I am saying that any form of eugenics which falls under the principle set out is not immoral/impermissible. To give you an example of this, when a cou...
November 21, 2024 at 21:09
We are talking about when eugenics is permissible. Never immoral = never impermissible.
November 21, 2024 at 20:59
I would apply the principle that it is never immoral to abstain from copulation in view of the extreme hardship that would result on the part of the p...
November 21, 2024 at 20:53
This presupposes beforehand that there is something wrong with it. We don't worry about "conditions for consent" when it comes to neutral acts. The pr...
November 21, 2024 at 20:47
- So we have a duty to bring about uniquely bad lives? (I'm leaving this thread now :grimace:)
November 21, 2024 at 20:28
You said: Who agrees with you? Not Morpheus, Trinity, Neo, etc. Not Cypher. He thinks the Matrix is better than the real world, but not "just as real....
November 21, 2024 at 20:26
:up:
November 21, 2024 at 20:22
Yes, something like that. <A valid argument with a false premise will result in a false conclusion> That seems intuitively correct. This may be close ...
November 21, 2024 at 20:08
From @"Wayfarer"'s source:
November 21, 2024 at 00:56
That is a very thin attempt at an explanation. What are the two putatively different claims, how are they different, and which one am I supposed to be...
November 21, 2024 at 00:48
Yes, but I think that all arguments are, structurally, modus ponens. This goes back to the earlier point about whether all arguments are modus ponens,...
November 21, 2024 at 00:40
See my post <here> and the excerpt contained therein <here>.
November 20, 2024 at 20:37
In Aristotelian terms, we would say that (1) is a proper accident of validity. It is not the essence of validity, and yet every valid argument will po...
November 20, 2024 at 20:34
The fact that they refuse a rewrite and Cypher desires it just shows that the experience of the one who takes a blue pill is different from the experi...
November 20, 2024 at 20:27
There are very few atheists. Therefore, God exists. :naughty:
November 20, 2024 at 07:46
But Cypher is the only one who agrees with you. He wants to be rewritten to forget about the real world (and also his betrayal). You're really opting ...
November 20, 2024 at 07:28
There are lots of niches in sprawling enterprises, and when everyone can set up shop in their own niche and be the resident expert there, pride finds ...
November 20, 2024 at 07:18
I think that's right. I think you've got the horse pulling the cart. I don't see this as relevant. I don't see that propositional logic has a causal o...
November 20, 2024 at 06:23
This all comes from the conversation that emerged after you insisted that NotAristotle needs to follow a rule: That characterization is a good example...
November 20, 2024 at 06:09
I actually said, "When I wrote it I wasn't sure whether you fit the bill or not." So no, not primarily you. Rather, you asked for information that you...
November 20, 2024 at 06:01
Incidentally, this is my mother's favorite kind of mathematics. :smile:
November 20, 2024 at 04:58
Why do you get to keep ignoring my question? Why do you think you are entitled to an answer to your question? Leontiskos: There are folk in these part...
November 20, 2024 at 04:44
When I wrote it I wasn't sure whether you fit the bill or not. Time to answer my question:
November 20, 2024 at 04:39